Fig. 17
![Possible conservative scenarios for future of nuclear power in USA, if no additional reactors are built [34]; based on 45 yr (a) and 60 yr (b) in service of current reactors (based on the data from Ref. [23])](https://asmedc.silverchair-cdn.com/asmedc/content_public/journal/nuclearengineering/5/2/10.1115_1.4042194/6/ners_005_02_024001_f017.png?Expires=1716475441&Signature=EWARTpntVjkXmGxoUZJ1t64VQnFWWSEX9bG0LoREbMqaK2VYC9ya54cYMhqsUcEJCzB1b3mJBuPfdE6crTBuX-nOo5km05aHrQN8VtG80-09LqdEEZsLxOKNGZBF7k4xmLXccLaYO~x1~IeSMBv6XXmCfjudg-Wi4AYZJkAxzAJ4wb3WvTgfEM3dheVRUelaniHnNGO22fPGEdvwMy0If74NlaXSXUGM1iJRNoWE8MAWxlXmHqkK3rpbGD9-hZ4QyEcl--vYfobi-tqxmv8bAvhw0lhbhsGgts2NfUWqjVBw-xyVwZ3ofZMXq~TOwKUE~G79NFHLZbIWeY5gnK7Uaw__&Key-Pair-Id=APKAIE5G5CRDK6RD3PGA)
Possible conservative scenarios for future of nuclear power in USA, if no additional reactors are built [34]; based on 45 yr (a) and 60 yr (b) in service of current reactors (based on the data from Ref. [23])
Possible conservative scenarios for future of nuclear power in USA, if no additional reactors are built [34]; based on 45 yr (a) and 60 yr (b) in service of current reactors (based on the data from Ref. [23])
