Abstract

It is well known from the literature that surface roughness significantly affects friction and heat transfer. This is even more evident for additive manufactured (AM) components, which are taking an increasingly important role in the gas turbine field. However, the exploitation of numerical approaches to improve their design is hindered by the lack of dedicated correlations and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models developed for such high roughness conditions. Usually, the AM components are simulated considering the surfaces as smooth or applying an equivalent sand-grain roughness (ks) that results in a velocity shift in the boundary layer. However, determining a priori the most appropriate value of ks is challenging, as dozens of correlations are available, returning scattered and uncertain results. A previous work proved how the CFD prediction of friction and heat transfer returns significant deviations, even exploiting the ks values obtained from experimental tests on the very same test case. That work also allowed identification of a promising CFD methodology based on friction and thermal corrections proposed by Aupoix from ONERA. The aim of this work is to further the assessment and calibration activity of the model, by analyzing additional experimental data of friction factor and Nusselt number from new test cases considering different geometries and flow conditions. The new coupons consisted of straight circular channels and wavy channels. This work represents a further step in the generation of a more validated and general methodology for the high-fidelity CFD analysis of AM components.

References

1.
Rehme
,
O.
, and
Emmelmann
,
C.
,
2005
, “
Reproducibility for Properties of Selective Laser Melting Products
,”
Proceedings of the Third International WLT-Conference Lasers in Manufacturing, LIM 2005
,
Munich, Germany
,
June 13–16
, pp.
227
232
. https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/TIBKAT:505594803/Lasers-in-manufacturing-2005-proceedings-of-the?cHash=02ed38f998380720f5a95d8f30c410df
2.
Ferrar
,
B.
,
Mullen
,
L.
,
Jones
,
E.
,
Stamp
,
R.
, and
Sutcliffe
,
C. J.
,
2012
, “
Gas Flow Effects on Selective Laser Melting (SLM) Manufacturing Performance
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
,
212
(
2
), pp.
355
364
.
3.
Snyder
,
J. C.
,
Stimpson
,
C. K.
,
Thole
,
K. A.
, and
Mongillo
,
D. J.
,
2015
, “
Build Direction Effects on Microchannel Tolerance and Surface Roughness
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
137
(
11
), pp.
111411
.
4.
Stimpson
,
C. K.
,
Snyder
,
J. C.
,
Thole
,
K. A.
, and
Mongillo
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Roughness Effects on Flow and Heat Transfer for Additively Manufactured Channels
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
138
(
5
), pp.
051008
.
5.
Kirsch
,
K. L.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2016
, “
Heat Transfer and Pressure Loss Measurements in Additively Manufactured Wavy Microchannels
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
1
), pp.
011007
.
6.
Kirsch
,
K. L.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2018
, “
Isolating the Effects of Surface Roughness Versus Wall Shape in Numerically Optimized, Additively Manufactured Micro Cooling Channels
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid. Sci.
,
98
, pp.
227
238
.
7.
Cormier
,
Y.
,
Dupuis
,
P.
,
Farjam
,
A.
,
Corbeil
,
A.
, and
Jodoin
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Additive Manufacturing of Pyramidal Pin Fins: Height and Fin Density Effects Under Forced Convection
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
75
, pp.
235
244
.
8.
Kirsch
,
K. L.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2017
, “
Pressure Loss and Heat Transfer Performance for Additively and Conventionally Manufactured Pin Fin Arrays
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
108
, pp.
2502
2513
.
9.
Ferster
,
K. K.
,
Kirsch
,
K. L.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2018
, “
Effects of Geometry, Spacing, and Number of Pin Fins in Additively Manufactured MicrochannelPin Fin Arrays
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
1
), p. 011007.
10.
Stimpson
,
C. K.
,
Snyder
,
J. C.
,
Thole
,
K. A.
, and
Mongillo
,
D.
,
2018
, “
Effectiveness Measurements of Additively Manufactured Film Cooling Holes
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
1
), p. 011009.
11.
Kirsch
,
K. L.
, and
Thole
,
K. A.
,
2017
, “
Experimental Investigation of Numerically Optimized Wavy Microchannels Created Through Additive Manufacturing
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
140
(
2
), p.
021002
.
12.
Hathaway
,
B. J.
,
Garde
,
K.
,
Mantell
,
S. C.
, and
Davidson
,
J. H.
,
2018
, “
Design and Characterization of an Additive Manufactured Hydraulic Oil Cooler
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
,
117
, pp.
188
200
.
13.
Moody
,
L.
,
1944
, “
Friction Factors for Pipe Flow
,”
Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng.
,
66
, pp.
671
681
.
14.
Colebrook
,
C. F.
,
1939
, “
Turbulent Flow in Pipes, With Particular Reference to the Transition Region Between the Smooth and Rough Pipe Laws
,”
J. Inst. Civil Eng.
,
11
(
4
), pp.
133
156
.
15.
Cebeci
,
T.
, and
Bradshaw
,
P.
,
1977
,
Momentum Transfer in Boundary Layers
,
Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
,
Washington, DC
.
16.
Bons
,
J. P.
,
2010
, “
A Review of Surface Roughness Effects in Gas Turbines
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
132
(
2
), p.
021004
.
17.
Stimpson
,
C. K.
,
Snyder
,
J. C.
,
Thole
,
K. A.
, and
Mongillo
,
D.
,
2016
, “
Scaling Roughness Effects on Pressure Loss and Heat Transfer of Additively Manufactured Channels
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
139
(
2
), p.
021003
.
18.
Molitor
,
V. D.
,
2018
,
Experimental Study on Pressure Losses in Additive Manufactured Channels
,
RWTH
,
Aachen
.
19.
Aupoix
,
B.
,
2015
, “
Improved Heat Transfer Predictions on Rough Surfaces
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
56
, pp.
160
171
.
20.
Mazzei
,
L.
,
Da Soghe
,
R.
, and
Bianchini
,
C.
,
2020
, “
CFD Modelling Strategies for the Simulation of Roughness Effects on Friction and Heat Transfer in Additive Manufactured Components
,” ASME, Virtual Event.
21.
Aupoix
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Roughness Corrections for the kω Shear Stress Transport Model: Status and Proposals
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
137
(
2
), p.
021202
.
22.
Aupoix
,
B.
,
2019
,
Fluent Theory Guide
,
ANSYS, Inc.
,
Canonsburg, PA
.
You do not currently have access to this content.