An aerodynamic single disciplinary optimization and an aerodynamic/structural multidisciplinary optimization of an axial compressor blade are performed using evolutionary algorithms in this paper. The blade is optimized for maximizing its isentropic efficiency in the aerodynamic single disciplinary optimization. The isentropic efficiency of the optimum blade obtained from the aerodynamic single disciplinary optimization is 1.65% higher than that of the reference blade, however, the mechanical performance analysis indicates that it has a higher stress distribution and does not satisfy the vibration frequency constraint. In the multidisciplinary optimization, the maximum of the isentropic efficiency and the minimization of the maximum stress are selected as the design objectives. The analysis results indicate that the method of dealing with minimization of the maximum stress as a design objective is proper and that the presented multiobjective and multidisciplinary optimization method is more suitable for the optimization design of a real turbomachinery blade than the traditional heuristic aerodynamic-structural iteration.

References

1.
Ashihara
,
K.
,
Guo
,
S. J.
,
Goto
,
A.
, and
Okamoto
,
H.
, 2004, “
Optimization of Microturbine Aerodynamics Using CFD, Inverse Design and FEM Structural Analysis (1st Report: Compressor Design)
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53431.
2.
Watanabe
,
H.
,
Okamoto
,
H.
,
Guo
,
S. J.
,
Goto
,
A.
, and
Zangeneh
,
M.
, 2004, “
Optimization of Microturbine Aerodynamics Using CFD, Inverse Design and FEM Structural Analysis (2nd Report: Turbine Design)
,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53583.
3.
Pierret
,
S.
,
Filomeno Coelho
,
R.
, and
Kato
,
H.
, 2007, “
Multidisciplinary and Multiple Operating Points Shape Optimization of Tree-dimensional Compressor Blades
,”
Struct. Multidiscip. Optim.
,
33
, pp.
61
70
.
4.
Verstraete
,
T.
,
Alsalihi
,
R. A.
, and
Van den Braembussche
,
R. A.
, 2007, “
Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Radial Compressor for Micro Gas Turbine Application
,” ASME Paper No. GT2007-27484.
5.
Siller
,
U.
,
Vob
,
C.
, and
Nicke
,
E.
, 2009, “
Automated Multidisciplinary Optimization of a Transonic Axial Compressor
,”
47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, AIAA2009-863
.
6.
Luo
,
C.
,
Song
,
L. M.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Feng
,
Z. P.
, 2009, “
Multiobjective Optimization Approach to Multidisciplinary Design of a Three-dimensional Transonic Compressor Blade
,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59982.
7.
Song
,
L. M.
,
Feng
,
Z. P.
, and
Li
,
J.
, 2005, “
Shape Optimization of Turbine Stage Using Adaptive Range Differential Evolution and Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Solver
,” ASME Paper No. GT2005-68280.
8.
Moore
,
R. D.
, and
Reid
,
L.
, 1980, “
Performance of Single-Stage Axial Flow Transonic Compressor With Rotor and Stator Aspect Ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, Respectively, and With Design Pressure Ratio of 2.05
,” NASA TP No.1659.
9.
Ernesto
,
B.
, 2004, “
Three-Dimensional Multi-Objective Design Optimization of a Transonic Compressor Rotor
,”
J. Propul. Power
,
20
, pp.
559
565
.
10.
NUMECA International, 2007, “NUMECA FINE/Turbo Version 8.2-1.”
11.
Li
,
L. Z.
,
Lu
,
Z. Z.
,
Wang
,
J. C.
, and
Yue
,
Z. F.
, 2007, “
Turbine Blade Temperature Transfer Using the Load Surface Method
,”
CAD
,
39
, pp.
494
505
.
12.
Schoenenborn
,
H.
,
Grossmann
,
D.
,
Satzger
,
W.
, and
Zisik
,
H.
, 2009, “
Determination of Blade-Alone Frequencies of a Blisk for Mistuning Analysis Based on Optical Measurements
,” ASME Paper No. GT2009-59148.
13.
Gen
,
M.
, 1996, “
Interval Programming Using Genetic Algorithms
,”
Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Soft Computing for Industry
.
You do not currently have access to this content.