Natural convection heat loss inevitably occurs in cavity-type receivers in high concentrating solar dishes, downward focusing systems and solar towers. In most applications, it can contribute a significant fraction of total energy loss, and hence it is an important determining factor in system performance. To investigate natural convection losses from cavity type receivers, an electrically heated model receiver, was tested at inclinations varying from −90 deg (cavity facing up) to 90 deg (cavity facing straight down), with test temperatures ranging from 450 to 650 deg C. Ratios of the aperture diameter to cavity diameter of 0.5, 0.6, 0.75, 0.85 and 1.0, were used. In addition to measurements of overall heat loss, the Synthetic Schlieren technique was used to visualize the flow pattern out of the cavity. Numerical modeling of the convection losses from the cavity was carried out for positive angles with the commercial computational fluid dynamics software package, Fluent 6.0. Good agreement was found between the numerical flow patterns at the aperture region with the schlieren images and between measured and predicted values for heat loss. Of the previously published work that has been reviewed, a model proposed by Clausing, A. M., 1981, “An Analysis of Convective Losses from Cavity Solar Central Receivers,” Sol. Energy 27 (4) pp. 295–300 shows the closest prediction to both numerical and experimental results for downward facing cavities despite its original use for bigger-scale central receivers.

1.
Clausing
,
A. M.
,
1981
, “
An Analysis of Convective Losses From Cavity Solar Central Receivers
,”
Sol. Energy
,
27
(
4
), pp.
295
300
.
2.
Luzzi, A., Lovegrove, K., Paitoonsurikarn, S., Siangsukone, P., Johnston, G., Burgess, G., Joe, W., and Major, G., 2002, “Paraboloidal Dish Solar Concentrator Investigations at the ANU-an update,” Proc. of the International Symposium on Concentrated Solar Power and Chemical Energy Technologies, Zurich.
3.
Clausing
,
A. M.
,
1983
, “
Convection Losses From Cavity Solar Receivers-Comparisons Between Analytical Predictions and Experimental Results
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
105
, pp.
29
33
.
4.
Clausing
,
A. M.
,
Waldvogel
,
J. M.
, and
Lister
,
L. D.
,
1987
, “
Natural Convection From Isothermal Cubical Cavities With a Variety of Side Facing Apertures
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer Trans.
,
109
, pp.
407
412
.
5.
Harris
,
J. A.
, and
Lenz
,
T. G.
,
1985
, “
Thermal Performance of Concentrator/Cavity Receiver Systems
,”
Sol. Energy
,
34
(
2
), pp.
135
142
.
6.
Koenig, A. A., and Marvin, M., 1981, “Convection Heat Loss Sensitivity in Open Cavity Solar Receivers,” Final report, DOE contract No. EG77-C-04-3985, Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.
7.
Stine, W. B., and McDonald, C. G., 1989, “Cavity Receiver Heat Loss Measurements,” Proc. of ISES World Congress, Kobe, Japan.
8.
Leibfried
,
U.
, and
Ortjohann
,
J.
,
1995
, “
Convective Heat Loss From Upward and Downward-Facing Cavity Solar Receivers: Measurements and Calculations
,”
J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
117
, pp.
75
84
.
9.
Dalziel
,
S. B.
,
Hughes
,
G. O.
, and
Sutherland
,
B. R.
,
2000
, “
Whole-Field Density Measurements by ‘Synthetic Schlieren,’ 
Exp. Fluids
,
28
, pp.
322
335
.
10.
Dalziel
,
S. B.
,
1992
, “
Decay of Rotating Turbulence: Some Particle Tracking Experiments
,”
Appl. Sci. Res.
,
49
, pp.
217
244
.
11.
Holman, J. P., 1997, Heat Transfer, 8th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.
12.
McDonald, C. G., 1995, “Heat Loss from an Open Cavity,” Sandia National Laboratories, California.
13.
Fluent Inc., 2002, Fluent 6 User Guide.
14.
Spalart
,
P. R.
,
2000
, “
Strategies for Turbulent Modeling and Simulations
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
,
21
, pp.
252
263
.
You do not currently have access to this content.