A numerical study was conducted to examine the impact of rotor solidity and blade number on the aerodynamic performance of small wind turbines. Blade element momentum theory and lifting line based wake theory were utilized to parametrically assess the effects of blade number and solidity on rotor performance. Increasing the solidity beyond what is traditionally used for electric generating wind turbines led to increased power coefficients at lower tip speed ratios, with an optimum between 3 and 4. An increase in the blade number at a given solidity also increased the maximum Cp for all cases examined. The possibility of a higher aerodynamic power extraction from solidity or blade number increases could lead to a higher overall system power production. Additional advantages over current 5% to 7% solidity, high speed designs would include lower noise, lower cut-in wind speed, and less blade erosion.

1.
Johnson, G. L., 1985, Wind Energy Systems, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
2.
Kentfield, J., 1996, The Fundamentals of Wind-Driven Water Pumpers, Gordon and Breach, Amsterdam.
3.
Sagrillo
,
M.
,
1998
, “
Apples and Oranges
,”
Home Power
,
65
, pp.
18
32
.
4.
Glauert, H., 1935, “Airplane Propellers,” W. F. Durand, ed., Aerodynamic Theory Volume IV, Division L, pp. 169–360, Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1963.
5.
Tangler, J. L., 2000, “The Evolution of Rotor and Blade Design,” NREL/CP-500-28410, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
6.
Rijs
,
R.
, and
Smulders
,
P.
,
1990
, “
Blade Element Theory for Performance Analysis of Slow Running Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Eng.
,
14
(
2
), pp.
62
79
.
7.
Viterna, L. A., and Corrigan, R. D., 1981, “Fixed Pitch Rotor Performance of Large Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” NASA Lewis Research Center, NASA Conf. Pub. 2230/DOE pub. CONF 810732.
8.
Jones
,
C.
,
1983
, “
Blade Element Performance in Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine Rotors
,”
Wind Eng.
,
7
(
3
), pp.
129
137
.
9.
Hansen, Martin O. L., 2000, Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines, James & James, London, pp. 22–59.
10.
Hernandez
,
J.
, and
Crespo
,
A.
,
1987
, “
Aerodynamics Calculation of the Performance of Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines and Comparison with Experimental Results
,”
Wind Eng.
,
11
(
4
), pp.
177
187
.
11.
Mueller, T. J., 1985, “Low Reynolds Number Vehicles,” AGARDograph No. 288.
12.
Duquette, M., 2002, “The Effect of Solidity and Blade Number on the Aerodynamic Performance of Small Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” Masters Thesis, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY.
13.
Kotb
,
M. A.
, and
Abdel Haq
,
M. M.
,
1992
, “
A Rigid Wake Model for a Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine
,”
Wind Eng.
,
15
(
2
), pp.
95
108
.
14.
Gould
,
J.
, and
Fiddes
,
S. P.
,
1992
, “
Computational Methods for the Performance Prediction of HAWTs
,”
J. Wind Eng Ind. Aerodyn
,
39
, pp.
61
72
.
15.
Tangler, J. L., 2002, “The Nebulous Art of Using Wind-Tunnel Airfoil Data for Predicting Rotor Performance,” 40th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, NV, AIAA 2002-0040.
16.
Selig, M. S., 1999, “PROPID and WTPREP, Aerodynamic Design Software for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” Department of Aeronautical and Astronautical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois.
17.
Giguere, P. and Selig, M. S., 1997, “New Airfoils for Small Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” Windpower ’97, Austin TX, pp. 241–250, CONF-970608-PROC.
You do not currently have access to this content.