Micro-electro-mechanical (MEM) translational tabs are introduced for active load control on aerodynamic surfaces such as wind turbine rotor blades. Microtabs are mounted near the trailing edge of rotor blades, deploy approximately normal to the surface, and have a maximum deployment height on the order of the boundary-layer thickness. Deployment of the tab effectively changes the sectional chamber of the rotor blade, thereby changing its aerodynamic characteristics. A tab with tab height to blade section chord ratio, h/c, of 0.01 causes an increase in the section lift coefficient, C1, of approximately 0.3, with minimal drag penalty. This paper presents a proof of concept microtab design and the multi-disciplinary techniques used to fabricate and test the tabs. Computational and experimental wind tunnel results for a representative airfoil using fixed as well as remotely actuated tabs are compared. Although the specifics of load control limitations, including actuation and response times will require further research, the results presented demonstrate the significant potential for using microtabs for active load control.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
wind turbines, rotors, aerodynamics, wind tunnels
Topics:
Airfoils, Design, Stress, Wind tunnels, Wind turbines, Drag (Fluid dynamics), Rotors, Blades, Chords (Trusses), Testing, Manufacturing
1.
Wind Power Monthly, 2000, 16, No. 1, p. 42.
2.
Swisher
,
R.
,
1998
, “
Windpower: A U.S. Perspective
,”
Wind Eng.
,
22
, No.
4
, pp.
185
–
188
.
3.
Twidell
,
J.
,
1998
, “
Fundamentals of Wind Power Technology and Environmental Impact: An Educational Aid
,”
Wind Eng.
,
22
, No.
5
, pp.
235
–
241
.
4.
Committee of Assessment of Research Needs, 1991, Assessment of Research Needs for Wind Turbine Rotor Materials Technology, National Academy Press, Washington DC.
5.
Stoddard, F. S., and Porter, B. K., 1986, “Wind Turbine Aerodynamics Research Needs Assessment,” DOE/ER/30075-H1.
6.
Danish Wind Turbine Manufacturers Association website, www.windpower.dk
7.
Liebeck
,
R. H.
,
1978
, “
Design of Subsonic Airfoils for High Lift
,”
J. Aircr.
,
15
, No.
9
, pp.
547
–
561
.
8.
Bloy
,
A. W.
,
Tsioumanis
,
N.
, and
Mellor
,
N. T.
,
1997
, “
Enhanced Aerofoil Performance using Small Trailing-Edge Flaps
,”
J. Aircr.
,
34
, No.
4
, pp.
569
–
571
.
9.
Storms
,
B. L.
, and
Jang
,
C. S.
,
1994
, “
Lift Enhancement of an Airfoil using a Gurney Flap and Vortex Generators
,”
J. Aircr.
,
31
, No.
3
, pp.
542
–
547
.
10.
Ashby, D. L., 1996, “Effects of Lift-Enhancing Tabs on a Two-Element Airfoil,” Aerospace Eng., pp. 31–37.
11.
Neuhart, D. H., 1988, “A Water Tunnel Study of Gurney Flaps,” NASA TM 4071.
12.
Gigue`re
,
P.
,
Dumas
,
G.
, and
Lemay
,
J.
,
1997
, “
Gurney Flap Scaling for Optimum Lift-to-Drag Ratio
,”
AIAA J.
,
35
, No.
12
, pp.
1888
–
1890
.
13.
Kentfield, J. A. C., 1994, “The Flow Over Gurney-Flaps, Devices for Improving Wind Turbine Performance,” Wind Power ’94, Minneapolis, May 1994, pp. 293–303.
14.
Kentfield
,
J. A. C.
,
1994
, “
Theoretically and Experimentally Obtained Performances of Gurney-Flap Equipped Wind Turbines
,”
ASME Wind Energy
, Vol.
15
, pp.
31
–
40
.
15.
Yen, D. T., van Dam, C. P., Bra¨uchle, F., Smith, R. L., and Collins, S. D., 2000, “Active Load Control and Lift Enhancement using MEM Translational Tabs,” AIAA Paper 2000–2422, June 2000.
16.
Gonzalez
,
C.
,
Smith
,
R. L.
,
Howitt
,
D. G.
, and
Collins
,
S. D.
,
1998
, “
MicroJoinery: Concept, Definition and Application to Microsystem Development
,”
Sens. Actuators A
,
66
, pp.
315
–
332
.
17.
Rogers
,
S. E.
, and
Kwak
,
D.
,
1990
, “
An Upwind Differencing Scheme for the Time-Accurate Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations
,”
AIAA J.
,
28
, No.
2
, pp.
253
–
262
.
18.
Rogers
,
S. E.
, and
Kwak
,
D.
,
1991
, “
An Upwind Differencing Scheme for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations
,”
Appl. Numer. Math.
,
8
, No.
1
, pp.
43
–
64
.
19.
Spalart, P. R., and Allmaras, S. R., 1994, “A One-Equation Turbulence Model for Aerodynamic Flows,” La Recherche Ae´rospatiale, No. 1, pp. 5–21
20.
Kelling, F. H., 1968, “Experimental Investigation of a High-Lift Low-Drag Aerofoil,” Aeronautical Research Council CP 1187.
21.
Galbraith
,
R. A. McD.
,
1985
, “
The Aerodynamic Characteristics of a GU25-5(11)-8 Aerofoil for Low Reynolds Numbers
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
3
, pp.
253
–
256
.
22.
UC Davis Wind Tunnel Facility, http://windtunnel.engr.ucdavis.edu/
23.
International Organization for Standardization, 1993, “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement,” Geneva, Switzerland.
24.
Yen, D. T., 2001, “Active Load Control using Microtabs,” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Davis.
25.
Glasfaser Flugzeugbau Streifeneder GmBH website, http://www.streifly.de/
26.
Shape Memory Alloy website, http://www.dynalloy.com/
27.
Hackett
,
J. E.
,
1996
, “
Tunnel-Induced Gradients and Their Effect on Drag
,”
AIAA J.
,
34
, No.
12
, pp.
2575
–
2581
.
28.
Van Dam
,
C. P.
,
1999
, “
Recent Experience with Different Methods of Drag Prediction
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
35
, pp.
751
–
798
.
29.
Vijgen, P. M. H. W., van Dam, C. P., Holmes, B. J., and Howard, F. G., 1989, “Wind Tunnel Investigations of Wings with Serrated Sharp Trailing Edges,” Low Reynolds Number Aerodynamics, Lecture Notes in Engineering, No. 54, T. J. Mueller (Ed.), Springer-Verlag, pp. 295–313.
30.
Van Dam
,
C. P.
,
Yen
,
D. T.
, and
Vijgen
,
P. M. H. W.
,
1999
, “
Gurney Flap Experiments on Airfoil and Wings
,”
J. Aircr.
,
36
, No.
2
, pp.
484
–
486
.
31.
Bechert, D. W., Meyer, R., and Hage, W., 2000, “Drag Reduction of Airfoils with Miniflaps. Can We Learn From Dragonflies?,” AIAA Paper 2000-2315, June.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.