A systematic blade design study was conducted to explore the trade-offs in using low-lift airfoils for a 750-kilowatt stall-regulated wind turbine. Tip-region airfoils having a maximum-lift coefficient ranging from 0.7-1.2 were considered in this study, with the main objective of identifying the practical lower limit for the maximum-lift coefficient. Blades were optimized for both maximum annual energy production and minimum cost of energy using a method that takes into account aerodynamic and structural considerations. The results indicate that the effect of the maximum-lift coefficient on the cost of energy is small with a slight advantage to the highest maximum lift coefficient case considered in this study. As a consequence, higher maximum lift coefficient airfoils for the tip-region of the blade become more desirable as machine size increases, provided the airfoils yield acceptable stall characteristics. The conclusions are applicable to large wind turbines that use passive or active stall to regulate peak power.

1.
Eppler, R., and Somers, D. M., 1980, “A Computer Program for the Design and Analysis of Low-Speed Airfoils, Including Transition,” NASA TM 80210.
2.
Fuglsang, P. L., and Madsen, H. A., 1995, “A Design Study of a 1 MW Stall-regulated Rotor,” Riso̸-R-799(EN), Riso̸ National Laboratory, Rosklide, Denmark.
3.
Gigue`re, P., and Selig, M. S., 1997, “Aerodynamic Blade Design Methods for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines,” 13th Annual Canadian Wind Energy Association Conference and Exhibition, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
4.
Hibbs, B., and Radkey, R. L., 1983, “Calculating Rotor Performance with the Revised ’PROP’ Computer Code,” Horizontal-Axis Wind System Rotor Performance Model Comparison—A Compendium, Wind Energy Research Center, Rockwell International, Rocky Flats Plant, Golden, CO, RFP-3508, UC-60.
5.
Huyer
S. A.
,
Simms
D.
, and
Robinson
M. C.
,
1996
, “
Unsteady Aerodynamics Associated with a Horizontal-Axis Wind Turbine
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
34
, No.
7
, pp.
1410
1419
.
6.
International Electrotechnical Commission, 1998, “IEC 61400-1, Ed, 2: Wind Turbine Generator Systems—Part 1: Safety Requirements,” FDIS 1998-12-15.
7.
Mandell, J. F., and Samborsky, D. D., 1997, “DOE/MSU Composite Material Fatigue Database; Test Methods, Materials, and Analysis,” Contractor Report SAND97-3002, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM.
8.
Musial, W., 1999, Private communication.
9.
Petersen, J. T., Madsen, H. A., Bjo¨rck, A., Enevoldsen, P., O`ye, S., Ganander, H., and Winkelaar, D., 1998, “Prediction of Dynamic Loads and Induced Vibrations in Stall,” Riso`-R-1045(EN), Riso` National Laboratory, Roskilde, Denmark.
10.
Selig
M. S.
, and
Tangler
J. L.
,
1995
, “
Development and Application of a Multipoint Inverse Design Method for Horizontal Axis Wind Turbines
,”
Wind Engineering
, Vol.
19
, No.
2
, pp.
91
105
.
11.
Selig
M. S.
, and
Coverstone-Carroll
V. L.
,
1996
Application of a Genetic Algorithm to Wind Turbine Design
,”
ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
, vol.
118
, pp.
22
28
.
12.
Somers, D. M., 1997a, “Design and Experimental Results for the S809 Airfoil,” NREL-SR-440-6918, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
13.
Somers, D. M., 1997b, “Design and Experimental Results for the S814 Airfoil,” NREL-SR-440-6919, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
14.
Sutherland, H., Beattie, A., Hansche, B., Musial, Walt, Allread, J., Johnson, J., and Summers, M., 1994, “The Application of Non-Destructive Techniques to the Testing of a Wind Turbine Blade,” SAND93-1380, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
15.
Tangler, J. L., and Somers, D. M., 1985, “Advanced Airfoils for HAWTs,” American Wind Energy Association WindPower ’85 Conference, San Francisco, CA.
16.
Tangler, J. L., and Somers, D. M., 1987, “Status of the Special-Purpose Airfoil Families,” American Wind Energy Association WindPower ’87 Conference, San Francisco, CA.
17.
Tangler, J. L., Smith, B., and Jager, D., 1992, “SERI Advanced Wind Turbine Blades,” NREL/TP-257-4492, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (formerly the Solar Energy Research Institute), Golden, CO.
18.
Tangler, J. L., Kelley, N., Jager, D., and Smith, B., 1994, “Measured Structural Loads for the Micon 65/13,” NREL/TP-442-6062, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO.
19.
Tangler, J.L., and Somers, D. M., 1995,“NREL Airfoil Families for HAWTs,” American Wind Energy Association WindPower ’95 Conference, Washington, DC.
20.
Tangler, J. l., and Selig, M. S., 1997, “An Evaluation of an Empirical Model for Stall Delay Due to Rotation for HAWT,” American Wind Energy Association WidPower ’97 Conference, Austin, TX.
21.
Tangler, J. L., and Somers, D. M., 1999, “Effect of Airfoil Thickness and Maximum Lift Coefficient on Roughness Sensitivity,” 3rd ASME JSME Joint Fluids Engineering Conference, San Francisco, CA.
22.
Wilson, R. E., and Walker, S. N., 1974, “A FORTRAN Program for the Determination of Performance, Load and Stability Derivatives of Windmills,” Department Mechanical Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.