Abstract

A case study was conducted on a mechanistic model development that predicted tensile strength deterioration with thermal aging of 9Cr-1Mo-V steel in supporting the 60-year design life expected for advanced nuclear reactors. For property prediction beyond practical testing times, mechanistic modeling is highly desired, as it taps into the physics of structure–property relationships and therefore can generate reliable results for extrapolation. Meanwhile, as mechanistic models are often complicated, reflecting the intricacy of microstructure and strengthening mechanisms, pitfalls that are difficult to detect often exist. This paper discusses latent pitfalls that are common in mechanistic modeling or specific in this 9Cr-1Mo-V case development through using the American Society of Mechanical Engineers verification and validation in computational solid mechanics (ASME V&V 10) standard for evaluating credibility of modeling in materials engineering. Suggestions are also made for enhancing reliability of microstructure-based modeling.

References

1.
Durst
,
P. J.
,
Bethel
,
C. L.
, and
Anderson
,
D. T.
,
2017
, “
A Historical Review of the Development of Verification and Validation Theories for Simulation Models
,”
Int. J. Model. Simul. Sci. Comput.
,
8
(
2
), p.
1730001
.10.1142/S1793962317300011
2.
Sargent
,
R. G.
, and
Balci
,
O.
,
2017
, “
History of Verification and Validation of Simulation Models
,”
Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference
, Las Vegas, NV, Dec. 3–6, pp.
292
307
.10.1109/WSC.2017.8247794
3.
Oberkampf
,
W. L.
, and
Roy
,
C. J.
,
2010
,
Verification and Validation in Scientific Computing
,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge, UK.
4.
Schwer
,
L. E.
,
2006
, “
An Overview of the PTC 60/V&V 10 Guide for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics: Transmitted by L. E. Schwer
,”
Eng. Comput.
,
23
(
4
), pp.
245
252
.https://www.roadsafellc.com/NCHRP22-24/Literature/Papers/Metrics/An%20overview%20of%20the%20PTC%2060-V%20and%20V%2010%20-%20guide%20for%20verification%20and%20validation%20in%20computational%20solid%20mechanics.pdf
5.
Wright
,
D. W.
,
Richardson
,
R. A.
,
Edeling
,
W.
,
Lakhlili
,
J.
,
Sinclair
,
R. C.
,
Jancauskas
,
V.
,
Suleimenova
,
D.
, et al.,
2020
, “
Building Confidence in Simulation: Applications of EasyVVUQ
,”
Adv. Theory Simul.
,
3
(
8
), p.
1900246
.10.1002/adts.201900246
6.
Courcelles
,
E.
,
Horner
,
M.
,
Afshari
,
P.
,
Kulesza
,
A.
,
Curreli
,
C.
,
Vaghi
,
C.
,
Morales-Orcajo
,
E.
, et al., “
Model Credibility
,”
Toward Good Simulation Practice - Best Practices for the Use of Computational Modelling and Simulation in the Regulatory Process of Biomedical Products
,
M.
Viceconti
, and
L.
Emili
, eds.,
Springer
, New York.
7.
Babuska
,
I.
, and
Oden
,
J. T.
,
2004
, “
Verification and Validation in Computational Engineering and Science: Basic Concepts
,”
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng.
,
193
(
36–38
), pp.
4057
4066
.10.1016/j.cma.2004.03.002
8.
Kemper
,
B.
,
2023
, “
Application of VVUQ Concepts to ASME Codes and Standards for Pressure Vessels
,”
ASME
Paper No. VVUQ2023-108506.10.1115/VVUQ2023-108506
9.
Rider
,
W. J.
,
Kamm
,
J. R.
, and
Weirs
,
G.
,
2016
, “
Verification, Validation, and Uncertainty Quantification for Coarse Grained Simulation
,”
Coarse Grained Simulation and Turbulent Mixing
,
F. F.
Grinstein
, ed.,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge, UK.
10.
Panchal
,
J. H.
,
Kalidindi
,
S. R.
, and
McDowell
,
D. L.
,
2013
, “
Key Computational Modeling Issues in Integrated Computational Materials Engineering
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
45
(
1
), pp.
4
25
.10.1016/j.cad.2012.06.006
11.
Romero
,
V.
,
Dempsey
,
J. F.
, and
Antoun
,
B.
,
2014
, “
Case Study Example: Application of UQ and V&V to Experiments and Simulations of Heated Pipes Pressurized to Failure
,” Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM; Sandia National Lab.(SNL-CA), Livermore, CA, Report No.
SAND2014-4870P
.https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1714508
12.
ASME
,
2020
, “
Standard for Verification and Validation in Computational Solid Mechanics
,” ASME V&V 10-2019, An American National Standard, ASME, New York.
13.
Ren
,
W.
,
2012
, “
Design and Construction of Relational Database for Structural Modeling Verification and Validation
,” ASME Verification and Validation Symposium 2012, Las Vegas, NV, May 2–4.
14.
Li
,
M.
,
Chen
,
W.-Y.
, and
Natesan
,
K.
,
2018
, “
Development of a Mechanistic Thermal Aging Model for Grade 91
,” Department of Energy, Chicago, IL, Report No.
ANL-ART-150
.https://publications.anl.gov/anlpubs/2018/12/148865.pdf
15.
Li
,
M.
, and
Chen
,
W.-Y.
,
2020
, “
Microstructure-Based Prediction of Thermal Aging Strength Reduction Factors for Grade 91 Ferritic-Martensitic Steel
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
,
798
(
2020
), p.
140116
.10.1016/j.msea.2020.140116
16.
Messner
,
M.
,
2022
, “
Consolidated Background Document for R19-411, Extend Thermal Aging Factors for Grade 91 From 300,000 to 500,000 h
,” C&S Connect, ASME Codes and Standards, ASME, New York, Record No. 19-411.
17.
Ren
,
W.
, and
Foulds
,
J.
,
2021
, “
9Cr-1Mo-V Tensile Property Data Survey and Analysis Screening for Thermal Aging Factor Development
,” Presentation in the Subgroup on High Temperature Reactors Working Group on Allowable Stress Criteria, Virtual meeting, American Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code Week.
18.
Ren
,
W.
, and
Foulds
,
J.
,
2021
, “
Issues and Concerns About R19-411 Modeling Approach to Developing Thermal Aging Factors for Nuclear Applications
,”
WG Allowable Stress Criteria (SG-HTR, BPV III) Meeting, ASME 2021 Fourth Quarter Code Week, Virtual Conference
.
19.
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
2021
, “
Standard Test Methods for Elevated Temperature Tension Tests of Metallic Materials
,” ASTM E21-20, West Conshohocken, PA.
20.
Karthik
,
V.
,
Laha
,
K.
,
Parameswaran
,
P.
,
Chandravathi
,
K. S.
,
Kasiviswanathan
,
K. V.
,
Jayakumar
,
T.
, and
Raj
,
B.
, July
2011
, “
Tensile Properties of Modified 9Cr-1Mo Steel by Shear Punch Testing and Correlation With Microstructures
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
88
(
10
), pp.
375
383
.10.1016/j.ijpvp.2011.07.001
21.
Foulds
,
J.
, and
Ren
,
W.
,
2022
, “
Thermal Aging Effects on the Yield and Tensile Strength of 9Cr-1Mo-V (Grade 91)
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
144
(
6
), p.
061505
.10.1115/1.4054341
22.
Ren
,
W.
,
2021
, “
A Discussion of Strength Reduction Factor Development for Thermal Aging Effect on Nuclear Structural Alloys
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2021-61055.10.1115/PVP2021-61055
23.
Ren
,
W.
, and
Swimdeman
,
R.
,
2009
, “
A Review Paper on Aging Effects in Alloy 617 for Gen IV Nuclear Reactor Applications
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
131
(
2
), p.
024002
.10.1115/1.2967885
24.
Lolla
,
T.
,
Siefert
,
J.
,
Gagliano
,
M.
, and
2018
, “
Mapping of Sigma Phase in Creep Tested Super304H Advanced Austenitic Steels
,”
IMS Symposium on Metallography and Microstructural Characterization of Materials and the Correlation of Microstructure to Mechanical Properties
, Charlotte, NC.
You do not currently have access to this content.