Abstract

To ensure the structure integrity of the reactor pressure vessel (RPV) in pressure water reactor plants, the main challenge is the embrittlement of beltline materials. However, the stress at inlet or outlet nozzles of the RPV which are reinforced in comparison with the beltline is more complex, especially under the thermal loads. In recent studies, significant research efforts have been conducted to show that the nozzle region may be more challenging under some conditions. In this paper, a fracture assessment for the RPV nozzles subjected to pressure and thermal loading is studied using the software abaqus 6.12 and Zen Crack 7.9-3. It includes: stress intensity factor calculation based on three-dimensional finite element method; structural integrity assessment under a typical loss of coolant accident (LOCA) transient; and the fatigue crack growth evaluation under cyclic loading situations. The results show that the stress intensity factor along the crack front is evidently asymmetric, and only to assess the safety of the deepest point along the crack front in the ASME and RCC-MR codes may be unreasonable. If the KIa criteria is applied, under a typical LOCA transient, it is difficult to obtain an effective fracture safety margin for a 1/4 thickness crack, while based on the KIC criteria, the nozzle is shown to be safe in the case study. The long shallow surface crack (which is often easily produced in the nozzle area) tends to be circle type under the cyclic pressure loading situation which shows that the crack shape assumed in the ASME and RCC-MR codes is reasonable.

References

1.
Moinereau
,
D.
,
Bezdikian
,
G.
, and
Faidy
,
C.
,
2001
, “
Methodology for the Pressurized Thermal Shock Evaluation: Recent Improvements in French RPV PTS Assessment
,”
Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip.
,
78
(
2–3
), pp.
69
83
.10.1016/S0308-0161(01)00023-0
2.
Chen
,
M.
,
Lu
,
F.
,
Wang
,
R.
,
Yu
,
W.
,
Wang
,
D.
,
Zhang
,
G.
, and
Xue
,
F.
,
2015
, “
The Probabilistic Structural Integrity Assessment of Reactor Pressure Vessels Under Pressurized Thermal Shock Loading
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
294
, pp.
93
102
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2015.08.020
3.
Chen
,
M.
,
Qian
,
G.
,
Shi
,
J.
,
Wang
,
R.
,
Yu
,
W.
,
Lu
,
F.
,
Zhang
,
G.
,
Xue
,
F.
, and
Chen
,
Z.
,
2016
, “
Zhilin Chen, Application of the French Codes to the Pressurized Thermal Shocks Assessment
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol..
,
48
(
6
), pp.
1423
1432
.10.1016/j.net.2016.06.009
4.
Choum
,
H.-W.
, and
Sheng
,
Y.-Y.
, “
2018
, “
Comparison of ASME Pressure-Temperature Limits on the Fracture Probability for a Pressurized Water Reactor Pressure Vessel
,”
Int. J. Eng. Res. Sci. Technol.
, 108(8), pp.
366
375
.10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.023
5.
Rui
,
S.
,
Ming
,
C.
,
Yinbiao
,
H.
, and
Hongxin
,
T.
,
2017
, “
Research on the Fracture Mechanics Analysis Method for Reactor Pressure Vessel Nozzle Corner Flaw
,”
ASME
Paper No. ICONE25-66284.10.1115/ICONE25-66284
6.
ASME XI,
2015
,
Section XI- ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, App. G, Fracture Toughness Criteria for Protection Against Failure
,
ASME
, New York.
7.
ASME III,
2015
,
Section III-Rules for the Design and Construction of Mechanical Equipment of Fast Reactor Nuclear Island
,
ASME
, New York.
8.
Blouin
,
A.
,
2017
, “
Recent Developments of Fracture Mechanics Tools for Nozzle Corners
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2017-65962.10.1115/PVP2017-65962
9.
Wilkening
,
W. W.
,
1991
, “
Stress Intensity Factor for an Underclad Nozzle Corner Crack Subjected to Pressure and Thermal Loading
,” ASME Paper.
10.
Shengjun
,
Y.
,
Bass
,
B. R.
,
Stevens
,
G. L.
, and
Kirk
,
M. T.
,
2011
, “
Stress and Fracture Mechanics Analyses of Boiling Water Reactor and Pressurized Water Reactor Pressure Vessel Nozzles
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2011-57014.10.1115/PVP2011-57014
11.
Newman
,
J. C.
, and
Raju
,
I. S.
,
1983
, “
Stress-Intensity Factor Equations for Cracks in Three-Dimensional Finite Bodies
,”
ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.
,
791
, pp.
238
265
.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/24318223_Stress_Intensity_Factor_Equations_for_Cracks_in_Three-Dimensional_Finite_Bodies_Subjected_to_Tension_and_Bending_Loads
12.
Bezdikian
,
G.
,
2005
, “
French Nuclear Plant Life Management Strategy Application on Reactor Pressure Vessles and Steam Generators Life Management
,”
18th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology
, Beijing, China, Aug. 7–12.https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:43021377
13.
Parks
,
D. M.
,
1974
, “
A Stiffness Derivative Finite Element Technique for Determination of Crack Tip Stress Intensity Factors
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
10
(
4
), pp.
487
502
.10.1007/BF00155252
14.
Hellen
,
T. K.
,
1975
, “
On the Method of Virtual Crack Extensions
,”
Int. J. Num. Met. Engn
,
9
(
1
), pp.
187
207
.10.1002/nme.1620090114
15.
Lorenzi
,
H. G.
,
1982
, “
On the Energy Release Rate and the J-Integral for 3-D Crack Configurations
,”
Int. J. Fract.
,
19
, pp.
183
193
.10.1007/BF00017129
16.
Timbrell
,
C.
,
Chandwani
,
R.
,
Maligno
,
A.
, and
Ma
,
C.
,
2011
, “
A Numerical Fracture Mechanics Tool to Help Assess the Structural Integrity of Nuclear Power Plant Components
,” Structural Integrity in Nuclear Engineering, Oct. 27.
17.
Chen
,
M.
,
Yu
,
W.
,
Qian
,
G.
,
Shi
,
J.
,
Cao
,
Y.
, and
Yu
,
Y.
,
2018
, “
Crack Initiation, Arrest and Tearing Assessments of a RPV Subjected to PTS Events
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
116
, pp.
143
151
.10.1016/j.anucene.2018.01.032
18.
International Atomic Energy Agency
,
2010
, “
Pressurized Thermal Shock in Nuclear Power Plants: Good Practices for Assessment
,” IAEA, Austria,
IAEA-TECDOC-1627
.https://www.iaea.org/publications/8237/pressurized-thermal-shock-in-nuclear-power-plants-goodpractices-for-assessment
19.
Zheng
,
L.
,
Xue
,
M.
, and
Shi
,
K.
,
2020
, “
Effect of Several Design Perameters on the Sealing Performance of Reactor Pressure Vessel
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2020-21208.10.1115/PVP2020-21208
You do not currently have access to this content.