## Abstract

The flow force acting on a valve disk plays an important role in the overall performance of pressure safety valves (PSVs). To quantify the disk force, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods have been widely implemented. In this paper, the capability of CFD models, and the identification of the most suitable turbulence models' geometry modeling and mesh requirements have been assessed to establish the accuracy of CFD models for disk force prediction. For validation purposes, a PSV disk force measuring rig was designed and constructed to obtain the steady-state flow forces exerted on the valve disk at different valve openings. The CFD model assessment is achieved by comparing the simulation results to experimental measurements; this is achieved in two stages. Stage 1 investigates the use of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS)-based turbulence models where two-dimensional (2D) simulations are performed with five turbulence models. The results indicate that a variety of force results are produced by different turbulence models, among which the shear stress transport (SST) k–ω was found to have the best performance. Stage 2 investigates meshing and the use of symmetry and geometry simplifications; 2D, 1/8 three-dimensional (3D) and 1/2 3D mesh models are examined. The results indicate that the 1/8 3D mesh model is the optimal choice, owing to its higher accuracy and reasonable grid scale. The studies performed in this paper extend the knowledge of compressible flow force prediction, and should facilitate the design or optimization of PSVs.

## References

1.
Darby
,
R.
,
2013
, “
The Dynamic Response of Pressure Relief Valves in Vapor or Gas Service—Part I: Mathematical Model
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
26
(
6
), pp.
1262
1268
.10.1016/j.jlp.2013.07.004
2.
Song
,
X. G.
,
Cui
,
L.
,
Cao
,
M. S.
,
Cao
,
W. P.
,
Park
,
Y. C.
, and
Dempster
,
W. M.
,
2014
, “
A CFD Analysis of the Dynamics of a Direct-Operated Safety Relief Valve Mounted on a Pressure Vessel
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
81
, pp.
407
419
.10.1016/j.enconman.2014.02.021
3.
Fromann
,
O.
, and
Friedel
,
L.
,
1998
, “
Analysis of Safety Relief Valve Chatter Induced by Pressure Wave in Gas Flow
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
11
, pp.
279
290
.10.1016/S0950-4230(97)00040-5
4.
Aldeeb
,
A. A.
,
Darby
,
R.
, and
Arndt
,
S.
,
2014
, “
The Dynamic Response of Pressure Relief Valves in Vapor or Gas Service. Part II: Experimental Investigation
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
31
, pp.
127
132
.10.1016/j.jlp.2014.06.002
5.
Song
,
X. G.
,
Wang
,
L. T.
,
Park
,
Y. C.
, and
Sun
,
W.
,
2015
, “
A Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of the Spring-Loaded Pressure Safety Valve During Popping Off
,”
Procedia Eng.
,
130
, pp.
87
94
.10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.178
6.
Song
,
X. G.
,
Wang
,
L.
, and
Park
,
Y. C.
,
2010
, “
Transient Analysis of a Spring-Loaded Pressure Safety Valve Using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
132
(
5
), p.
054501
.10.1115/1.4001428
7.
Hos
,
C. J.
,
Champneys
,
A. R.
,
Paul
,
K.
, and
McNeely
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Dynamic Behavior of Direct Spring Loaded Pressure Relief Valves in Gas Service: Model Development, Measurements and Instability Mechanisms
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
31
, pp.
70
81
.10.1016/j.jlp.2014.06.005
8.
Darby
,
R.
, and
Aldeeb
,
A. A.
,
2014
, “
The Dynamic Response of Pressure Relief Valves in Vapor or Gas Service—Part III: Model Validation
,”
J. Loss Prev. Process Ind.
,
31
, pp.
133
141
.10.1016/j.jlp.2014.06.001
9.
Duan
,
Y.
,
Eaton
,
M. D.
,
Bluck
,
M. J.
, and
Jackson
,
C.
,
2018
, “
A Validation of CFD Methods on Predicting Valve Performance Parameters
,”
ASME
Paper No. POWER2018-7434. 10.1115/POWER2018-7434
10.
Duan
,
Y.
,
Jackson
,
C.
,
Eaton
,
M. D.
, and
Bluck
,
M. J.
,
2019
, “
An Assessment of Eddy Viscosity Models on Predicting Performance Parameters of Valves
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
342
, pp.
60
77
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.11.036
11.
Lisowski
,
E.
, $Czy z ˙ycki,$
W.
, and
Rajda
,
J.
,
2013
, “
Three Dimensional CFD Analysis and Experimental Test of Flow Force Acting on the Spool of Solenoid Operated Directional Control Valve
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
70
, pp.
220
229
.10.1016/j.enconman.2013.02.016
12.
Simic
,
M.
, and
Herakovic
,
N.
,
2015
, “
Reduction of the Flow Forces in a Small Hydraulic Seat Valve as Alternative Approach to Improve the Valve Characteristics
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
89
, pp.
708
718
.10.1016/j.enconman.2014.10.037
13.
Amirante
,
R.
,
Moscatelli
,
P. G.
, and
Catalano
,
L. A.
,
2007
, “
Evaluation of the Flow Forces on a Direct (Single State) Proportional Valve by Means of a Computational Fluid Dynamic Analysis
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
48
(
3
), pp.
942
953
.10.1016/j.enconman.2006.08.024
14.
Scuro
,
N. L.
,
Angelo
,
E.
,
Angelo
,
G.
, and
,
D. A.
,
2018
, “
A CFD Analysis of the Flow Dynamics of a Directly-Operated Safety Relief Valve
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
328
, pp.
321
332
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.01.024
15.
Asim
,
T.
,
Charlton
,
M.
, and
Mishra
,
R.
,
2017
, “
CFD Based Investigations for the Design of Severe Service Control Valves Used in Energy Systems
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
153
, pp.
288
303
.10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.012
16.
Dempster
,
W. M.
,
Lee
,
C. K.
, and
Deans
,
J.
,
2006
, “
Prediction of the Flow and Force Characteristics of Safety Relief Valves
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2006-ICPVY-11-93142. 10.1115/PVP2006-ICPVY-11-93142
17.
Dempster
,
W. M.
, and
Alshaikh
,
M.
,
2018
, “
CFD Prediction of Safety Valve Disc Forces Under Two Phase Flow Conditions
,”
ASME
Paper No. PVP2018-84745. 10.1115/PVP2018-84745
18.
API
,
2014
, “
Sizing, Selection, and Installation of Pressure-Relieving Devices—Part I: Sizing and Selection
,” American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC, Standard No. STD 520 P1.
19.
ANSYS Inc.
, 2019, “ANSYS Documentation, Fluent, Turbulence, 4.0,” ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.
20.
ANSYS Inc.
, 2019, “ANSYS Documentation, Fluent, Defining Total Pressure and Temperature, 6.3.3.1.1.2,” ANSYS, Canonsburg, PA.