The object of this paper is to investigate the effect of the geometry of circumferential grooves on the connection strength of hydraulically expanded tube-to-tubesheet joints of heat exchangers. Seven-tube models with different groove widths, depths, spacings, and locations were fabricated under the same expansion pressure by commercial hydraulic expanders. Then the corresponding pullout forces were gained by experimental means. In addition, the process of hydraulic expansion of tube-to-tubesheet joints was simulated using the nonlinear finite element method based on a two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetrical model. The residual stress and deformation of joints were determined, and the effect of geometrical parameters of the grooves on the connection strength of joints was studied in terms of the average residual contact pressure of the joints. The experimental and calculation results indicate that the most important geometrical factor for determining the connection strength is the groove width. Groove depth, spacing, and location have a secondary effect. Optimum geometrical sizes of grooves are proposed based on maximum axial strength. These can provide a reference for the revision of design and manufacturing codes.

1.
Yokell
,
S.
, 1982, “
Heat Exchanger Tube-Tubesheet Connection
,”
Chem. Eng. J.
0300-9467,
75
, pp.
78
94
.
2.
Allam
,
M.
,
Chaaban
,
A.
, and
Bazergui
,
A.
, 1995, “
Residual Contact Pressure of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints: Finite Element and Analytical Analyses
,”
Proc. of 1995 Joint ASME/JSME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf.
,
ASME
, New York, NY, Vol.
305
, pp.
57
64
.
3.
Allam
,
M.
,
Chaaban
,
A.
, and
Bazergui
,
A.
, 1997, “
Optimum Expansion and Residual Contact Pressure Levels of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints
,”
Trans. Can. Soc. Mech. Eng.
0315-8977,
21
, pp.
415
434
.
4.
Allam
,
M.
,
Bazergui
,
A.
, and
Chaaban
,
A.
, 1998, “
Effect of Tube Strain Hardening Level on the Residual Contact Pressure and Residual Stresses of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joint
,”
Proc. of 1998 ASME/JSME Joint Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf.
,
ASME
, NY, Vol.
373
, pp.
447
455
.
5.
Allam
,
M.
, and
Bazergui
,
A.
, 2002, “
Axial Strength of Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints: Finite Element and Experimental Evaluations
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
124
, pp.
22
31
.
6.
Sang
,
Z. F.
,
Zhu
,
Y. Z.
, and
Widera
,
G. E. O
, 1996, “
Reliability Factors and Tightness of Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
118
, pp.
137
141
.
7.
Williams
,
D. K.
, 2003, “
Predictions of Residual Stresses in the Mechanical Roll of HX Tubes Into TEMA Grooves
,”
Proc. of 2003 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference
,
ASME
, NY, Vol.
459
, pp.
121
129
.
8.
Jawad
,
M. H.
,
Clark
E. J.
, and
Schuessler
R. E.
, 1987, “
Evaluation of Tube-to-Tubesheet Junctions
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
109
, pp.
19
26
.
9.
Yoshitomi
,
Y.
, 1979, “
Tube-Hole Structure for Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joint
,” U.S. Patent No. 4,142,581.
10.
Updike
,
D. P.
,
Kalnins
,
A.
, and
Caldwell
,
S. M.
, 1990, “
Analysis of Tube-Tubesheet Joints With Grooves
,”
Proc. of 1990 Pressure Vessels and Piping Conf.
,
W. E.
Short
, eds.,
ASME
, NY, Vol.
194
, pp.
71
76
.
11.
Kohlpaintner
,
W. R.
, 1995, “
Calculation of Hydraulically Expanded Tube-to-Tubesheet Joints
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
117
, pp.
24
30
.
12.
Yan
,
H. G.
,
Zhang
,
B. S.
, and
Ge
,
L. T.
, 1996, “
Research on Hydraulically Expanded Tube-Tubesheet Joints, II: Residual Contact and Friction Coefficient
,”
J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
0094-9930,
13
, pp.
309
313
.
You do not currently have access to this content.