A hybrid method is presented which permits calculation of residual stresses in a swage autofrettaged tube including Bauschinger effect. The results are generally supported by three types of available experimental evidence by comparing “equivalent” swage and hydraulic autofrettage tubes having the same level of overstrain. Radial slitting of the swaged tube is predicted to show a greater opening angle than its hydraulic equivalent. Fatigue lifetime of the swaged tube is predicted to be significantly higher than the hydraulic case. Re-pressurization of the equivalent tubes is predicted to produce initial re-yielding at the same pressure in both cases. Analysis of results shows that permanent strains in the swaged tube are expected to appear at a pressure level below that for the hydraulic tube.

1.
O’Hara, G. P., 1992, “Analysis of the Swage Autofrettage Process,” US Army ARDEC Technical Report ARCCB-TR-92016, Bene´t Laboratories, Watervliet Arsenal, NY 12189, USA.
2.
Parker
,
A. P.
,
2001
, “
Autofrettage of Open End Tubes—Pressures, Stresses, Strains and Code Comparisons
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
123
, pp.
271
281
.
3.
Jahed
,
H.
, and
Dubey
,
R. N.
,
1997
, “
An Axisymmetric Method of Elastic-Plastic Analysis Capable of Predicting Residual Stress Field
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
119
, pp.
264
273
.
4.
Parker, A. P., Sleeper, K. A., and Andrasic, C. P., 1981, “Safe Life Design of Gun Tubes—Some Numerical Methods and Results,” US Army ARO Report 81-3, Proceedings of 1981 Army Numerical Analysis and Computers Conference, pp. 311–333.
5.
Parker
,
A. P.
,
Underwood
,
J. H.
, and
Kendall
,
D. P.
,
1999
, “
Bauschinger Effect Design Procedures for Autofrettaged Tubes Including Material Removal and Sachs’ Method
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
121
, pp.
430
437
.
6.
Parker, A. P., Troiano, E., Underwood, J. H., and Mossey, C., 2001, “Characterization of Steels Using a Revised Kinematic Hardening Model Incorporating Bauschinger Effect,” ASME J. of Pressure Vessel Technology, accepted for publication.
7.
Hill, R., 1967, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity, Oxford University Press.
8.
Parker
,
A. P.
, and
Farrow
,
J. R.
,
1980
, “
On the Equivalence of Axi-Symmetric Bending, Thermal and Autofrettage Residual Stress Fields
,”
J. Strain Anal. Eng. Des.
,
15
, pp.
51
52
.
9.
Parker, A. P., Underwood, J. H., Throop, J. F., and Andrasic, C. P., 1983, “Stress Intensity and Fatigue Crack Growth in a Pressurized, Autofrettaged Thick Cylinder,” American Society for Testing and Materials 14th Nat Symp on Fracture Mechanics, UCLA, ASTM STP 791, pp. 216–237.
10.
Paris
,
P. C.
, and
Erdogan
,
F.
,
1963
, “
A Critical Analysis of Crack Propagation Laws
,”
J. Basic Eng.
,
85
, pp.
528
534
.
11.
Andrasic, C. P., and Parker, A. P., 1984, “Dimensionless Stress Intensity Factors for Cracked Thick Cylinders Under Polynomial Crack Face Loadings,” Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 19, pp. 187–193.
12.
Andrasic, C. P., and Parker, A. P., 1982, “Spline Fit Weight Function Data for Cracked Thick Cylinders,” Royal Military College of Science Technical Note MAT/36, RMCS Shrivenham, Swindon, UK.
13.
Adachi, J., and Baratta, F., 1967, “Comparative Evaluation of Swage-Autofrettage and Hydraulic-Autofrettage Processes,” Army Materials and Mechanics Research Center, Watertown, MA, Letter Report dated 26 September 1967.
14.
Underwood
,
J. H.
,
Moak
,
D. B.
,
Audino
,
M. A.
, and
Parker
,
A. P.
,
2001
, “
Yielding Tests and Analysis of Gun Tubes Following Autofrettage
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
125
, pp.
7
10
.
You do not currently have access to this content.