In 1995, the High-Energy Piping Strategic Management Plan (HEPSMP) was initiated at TransAlta Utilities Corporation (TAU) for the three generating facilities. At that time, it was recognized that several of the piping systems were exhibiting signs of creep relaxation, with some hangers bottomed or topped out online and/or offline. Previous hanger adjustment attempts were not always adequate. The program workscope included: 1) hot and cold piping system walkdowns, 2) selection of high-priority girth weld inspection locations, 3) examination of critical weldments, 4) weld repairs where necessary, 5) adjustments or modifications of malfunctioning steam line hangers, and 6) recommended work for future scheduled outages. Prior to 1996, examination locations were limited to the traditional locations of the terminal points at the boiler and turbine, with reexaminations occurring at arbitrary intervals. Since the terminal points are not necessarily the most highly stressed welds causing service-related creep damage, service damage may not occur first at the pre-1996 examined locations. There was a need to maximize the safety and integrity of these lines by ensuring that the highest risk welds were identified and given the highest priority for examination. An engineering consulting company was selected to prioritize the highest risk weldments for each piping system. This risk-based methodology included the prediction and evaluation of actual sustained loads, thermal expansion loads, operating loads, multiaxial stresses, creep relaxation, and cumulative creep life exhaustion. The technical process included detailed piping system walkdowns and application of advanced analytical techniques to predict and rank creep/fatigue damage for each piping system. TAU has concluded that the program has met its objective of successfully prioritizing inspection locations. The approach has also resulted in reducing the scope and cost of reexaminations. Phases 1 and 2 evaluations and examinations have been completed for all units. Results of some of the important aspects of this program are provided as case history studies.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
pipe flow, creep, cracks, steam power stations, pressure vessels, welding, failure (mechanical), design engineering
Topics:
Creep, Damage, Pipes, Piping systems, Stress, Welded joints, Fracture (Materials), Maintenance, Turbines
1.
Cohn, M. J., and Paterson, S. R., 1994, “Life Management of High Energy Piping Girth Welds,” Plant Systems/Comnonents Aging Management, ASME PVP-Vol. 283, pp. 79–90.
2.
Cohn, M. J., 1995, “Prediction of Creep Life Exhaustion in High Energy Piping System Girth Welds,” Fitness-for-Service and Decisions for Petroleum and Chemical Equipment, ASME PVP-Vol. 315, pp. 221–228.
3.
Cohn, M. J., and Yee, R. K., 1998, “Creep Relaxation Behavior of High Energy Piping,” Fitness-for-Service Evaluations in Petroleum and Fossil Power Plants, ASME PVP-Vol. 380, pp. 135–150.
4.
Paterson, S. R., 1988, “Determination of Reinspection Intervals for Steam Pipe Weldments Based on Replica Evaluations,” Aptech Engineering Services, Inc. APTECH Memorandum, Dec.
5.
Viswanathan, R., 1993, “Life Assessment of High Temperature Components—Current Concerns and Research in the U.S.,” Life Assessment of Industrial Components and Structures, European Conference, sponsored by ERA Technology, Ltd., September 30–October 1.
6.
Viswanathan
,
R.
,
Paterson
,
S. R.
,
Grunloh
,
H.
, and
Gehl
,
S.
,
1994
, “
Life Assessment of Superheater and Reheater Tubes in Fossil Boilers
,”
ASME J. Pressure Vessel Technol.
,
116
, Feb. pp.
1
–
16
.
Copyright © 2001
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.