Statistical analyses of pressure vessel failure rates indicate that, to date, the record is very good. However, the public hazard and environmental consequences of failure in certain industrial processes now give cause for much greater concern. With the exception of an Appendix in ASME III, the current design codes and requirements for new vessels are all based on the assumption that they are free from cracklike defects, but engineers recognize that such perfect vessels cannot be manufactured. Taking into account failure mechanisms, material properties, pre and in-service inspection, proof testing, failure statistics and probabilistic methods, views are put forward on how a damage-tolerant design and inspection philosophy may be developed to reduce further the possibility of “rogue” vessel failure.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
November 1980
Research Papers
A Damage-Tolerant Design and Inspection Philosophy for Nuclear and Other Pressure Vessels
N. J. I. Adams
N. J. I. Adams
London, U.K.
Search for other works by this author on:
N. J. I. Adams
London, U.K.
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. Nov 1980, 102(4): 334-341 (8 pages)
Published Online: November 1, 1980
Article history
Received:
January 10, 1979
Revised:
February 28, 1980
Online:
November 5, 2009
Citation
Adams, N. J. I. (November 1, 1980). "A Damage-Tolerant Design and Inspection Philosophy for Nuclear and Other Pressure Vessels." ASME. J. Pressure Vessel Technol. November 1980; 102(4): 334–341. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3263341
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Cited By
Crack Growth Prediction Based on Uncertain Parameters Using Ensemble Kalman Filter
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Experimental Research on Thermal-Oxidative Aging Performance of Polyethylene Pipe Under Hydrostatic Pressure
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
The upper bound of the buckling stress of axially compressed carbon steel circular cylindrical shells
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Dynamics Modeling and Analysis of Small-Diameter Pipeline Inspection Gauge during Passing Through Elbow
J. Pressure Vessel Technol
Related Articles
The Use of Risk-Based Approaches in Post-Construction Standards
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (August,2000)
Nondestructive Evaluation of FRP Design Criteria With Primary Consideration to Fatigue Loading
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (May,2004)
A Means of Assessing the Effects of Periodic Proof Testing and NDE on the Reliability of Cyclically Loaded Structures
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (May,1978)
Technical Basis for Code Cases on Design of Ellipsoidal and Torispherical Heads for ASME Section VIII Vessels
J. Pressure Vessel Technol (February,2000)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Section VIII: Division 2–Alternative Rules
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Codes, Volume 2, Sixth Edition
Basic Concepts
Design & Analysis of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Components in the Creep Range
Iwe and Iwl
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 2, Third Edition