In this article, the correct form of Eq. (18) for the weak-scatterer contribution iswhere the term R was missing from the originally published version and is defined byThis term is negligible for the slender hulls like the Wigley I and the DTC. It also has negligible influence on the results of other geometries presented in this article. The only case with a visible influence is the RIOS hull at β = 100 and Fr = 0.18 (Fig. 6, bottom left). This figure is updated with the correct results for Salvesen (new).
(18)
