This paper is concerned with the development of a floating offshore wind turbine (FOWT) utilizing spar-type floating foundation. In order to design such a structure, it is essential to evaluate the dynamic response under extreme environmental conditions. In this study; therefore, a dynamic analysis tool has been developed. The dynamic analysis tool consists of a multibody dynamics solver (MSC.Adams), aerodynamic force evaluation library (NREL/AeroDyn), hydrodynamic force evaluation library (in-house program named SparDyn), and mooring force evaluation library (in-house program named Moorsys). In this paper, some details of the developed dynamic analysis tool are given. In order to validate the program, comparison with the experimental results, where the wind, current, and wave are applied simultaneously, has been made. In this paper, only parked conditions are considered. The comparison shows that the principal behavior of the floating offshore wind turbine with spar platform has been captured by the developed program. However, when vortex-induced motion (VIM) occurs, the current loads and cross-flow responses (sway and roll) are underestimated by the simulation since the simulation code does not account for the effect of VIM.

References

1.
Nielsen
,
F. G.
,
Hanson
,
T. D.
, and
Skaare
,
B.
,
2006
, “
Integrated Dynamic Analysis of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proceedings of 25th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering
,
Hamburg, Germany
, OMAE2006-92291.
2.
Jonkman
,
J.
, and
Musial
,
W.
,
2010
, “
Offshore Code Comparison Collaboration (OC3) for IEA Task 23 Offshore Wind Technology and Deployment
,”
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
, Technical Report NREL/TP-5000-48191.
3.
Karimirad
,
M.
, and
Moan
,
T.
,
2011
, “
Extreme Dynamic Structural Response Analysis of Catenary Moored Spar Wind Turbine in Harsh Environmental Conditions
,”
ASME J. Offshore Mech. Arctic Eng.
,
133
, p.
041103
.10.1115/1.4003393
4.
Cordle
,
A.
, and
Jonkman
,
J.
,
2011
, “
State of the Art in Floating Wind Turbine Design Tools
,”
Proceedings of the 21st International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
,
Maui, HI
, Vol.
1
, pp.
367
374
.
5.
Matha
,
D.
,
Schlipf
,
M.
,
Cordle
,
A.
,
Pereira
,
R.
, and
Jonkman
,
J.
,
2011
, “
Challenges in Simulation of Aerodynamics, Hydrodynamics, and Mooring-Line Dynamics of Floating Offshore Wind Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the 21st International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
,
Maui, HI
, Vol.
1
, pp.
421
428
.
6.
Cummins
,
W. E.
,
1962
, “
The Impulse Response Function and Ship Motions
,” Department of the Navy David Taylor Model Basin, Washington, DC, Report 1661.
7.
Utsunomiya
,
T.
,
Nishida
,
E.
, and
Sato
,
I.
,
2009
, “
Wave Response Experiment on SPAR-Type Floating Bodies for Offshore Wind Turbine
,”
Proceedings of the 19th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
,
Osaka, Japan
, Vol.
1
, pp.
378
383
.
8.
Utsunomiya
,
T.
,
Sato
,
T.
,
Matsukuma
,
H.
, and
Yago
,
K.
,
2009
, “
Experimental Validation for Motion of a Spar-Type Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Using 1/22.5 Scale Model
,”
Proceedings of 28th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Honolulu, HI
, OMAE2009-79695.
9.
Utsunomiya
,
T.
,
Matsukuma
,
H.
,
Minoura
,
S.
,
Ko
,
K.
,
Hamamura
,
H.
,
Kobayashi
,
K.
,
Sato
,
I.
,
Nomoto
,
Y.
, and
Yasui
,
K.
,
2010
, “
On Sea Experiment of a Hybrid Spar for Floating Offshore Wind Turbine Using 1/10 Scale Model
,”
Proceedings of 29th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Shanghai, China
, OMAE2010-20730.
10.
Kokubun
,
K.
,
Ishida
,
S.
,
Nimura
,
T.
,
Chujo
,
T.
,
Yoshida
,
S.
, and
Utsunomiya
,
T.
,
2012
, “
Model Experiment of a SPAR Type Offshore Wind Turbine in Storm Condition
,”
Proceedings of 31st International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering
,
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
, OMAE2012-83993.
11.
Jonkman
,
J.
, and
Buhl
, Jr.,
M. L.
,
2005
, FAST User’s Guide, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report NREL/EL-500-38230.
12.
Laino
,
D. J.
, and
Hansen
,
A. C.
,
2002
,
AeroDyn User’s Guide, Version 12.50
,
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
,
Golden, CO
.
13.
Moriarty
,
P. J.
, and
Hansen
,
A. C.
,
2005
,
AeroDyn Theory Manual, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO
, Technical Report NREL/EL-500-36881.
14.
American Petroleum Institute
,
2000
, “
Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms—Working Stress Design
,” API RP 2A-WSD, 21st Edition, Washington, DC.
15.
Sarpkaya
,
T.
,
2010
,
Wave Forces on Offshore Structures
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
16.
Det Norske Veritas
,
2007
, “
Environmental Conditions and Environmental Loads
,” Norway, DNV-RP-C205.
You do not currently have access to this content.