The Wave Crest Sensor Intercomparison Study (WACSIS) was designed as a thorough investigation of the statistical distribution of crest heights. Measurements were made in the southern North Sea during the winter of 1997–1998 from the Meetpost Noordwijk in 18 m water depth. The platform was outfitted with several popular wave sensors, including Saab and Marex radars, an EMI laser, a Baylor wave staff and a Vlissingen step gauge. Buoys were moored nearby to obtain directional spectra. Two video cameras viewed the ocean under the wave sensors and their signals were recorded digitally. The data analysis focused on comparisons of the crest height measurements from the various sensors and comparisons of the crest height distributions derived from the sensors and from theories. Some of the sensors had greater than expected energy at high frequencies. Once the measurements were filtered at 0.64 Hz, the Baylor, EMI and Vlissingen crest height distributions matched quite closely, while those from the other sensors were a few percent higher. The Baylor and EMI crest distributions agreed very well with the statistics from second order simulations, while previous parameterizations of the crest height distribution were generally too high. We conclude that crest height distributions derived from second order simulations can be used with confidence in engineering calculations. The data were also used in investigations of crest and trough shapes and the joint height/period distribution.

1.
Banner
,
M. L.
,
1990
,
Equilibrium spectra of wind waves
,
J. Phys. Oceanogr.
,
20
,
966
984
.
2.
Barstow, S. F., 2002, Intercomparison of seastate and zerocrossing parameters from the WACSIS field experiment and interpretation with video evidence, Proc. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, OMAE 28448.
3.
Cavanie, A., M. Arhan, and R. Ezraty, 1976. A statistical relationship between individual heights and periods of storm waves. Proceedings BOSS ’76, Trondheim, 354–360.
4.
E&P Forum, 1995, Uncertainties in the Design Process, Report 3.15/229, London.
5.
Forristall
,
G. Z.
,
2000
,
Wave crest distributions: Observations and second order theory
,
J. Phys. Oceanogr.
,
30
,
1931
1943
.
6.
Haring, R. E., A. R. Osborne, and L. P. Spencer, 1976, Extreme wave parameters based on continental shelf storm wave records, Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Coastal Engineering, Honolulu, HI, 151–170.
7.
Hasofer
,
A. M.
, and
Lind
,
N. C.
,
1974
,
J. Eng. Mech. Div., Am. Soc. Civ. Eng.
,
100
,
111
121
.
8.
Kriebel, D. L., and T. H. Dawson, 1993, Nonlinearity in wave crest statistics, Proc. Second Int. Symp. on Ocean Wave Measurement and Analysis, New Orleans, LA, ASCE, 61–75.
9.
Krogstad, H. E., 2002, Analyses and applications of second order models for maximum crest height, Proc. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, OMAE 28479.
10.
Kuik
,
A. J.
,
van Vledder
,
G. Ph.
, and
Holthuijsen
,
L. H.
,
1988
,
A method for the routine analysis of pitch-and-roll buoy wave data
,
J. Phys. Oceanogr.
,
18
,
1020
1034
.
11.
Leadbetter, M. R., Lindgren, G., and Rootzen, H., 1983, Extremes and related properties of random sequences and processes, Springer-Verlag, New York.
12.
Longuet-Higgins
,
M. S.
,
1975
,
On the joint distribution wave periods and amplitude in a random wave field.
Proc. R. Soc. A
,
389
,
24
258
.
13.
Prevosto
,
M. S.
,
Krogstad
,
H. E.
, and
Robin
,
A.
,
2000
,
Probability distributions for maximum wave and crest heights
,
Coastal Eng.
,
40
,
329
360
.
14.
Prevosto, M., G. Z. Forristall, 2002, Statistics of wave crests from models vs. measurements, Proc. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, OMAE 28443.
15.
Rychli
,
I.
,
Johannesson
,
P.
, and
Leadbetter
,
M. R.
,
1997
,
Modeling and statistical analysis of ocean wave data using transformed Gaussian processes
.
Mar. Struct.
,
10
,
13
47
.
16.
Sharma, J. N., and R. G. Dean, 1979, Development and evaluation of a procedure for simulating a random directional second order sea surface and associated wave forces, Ocean Engineering Report No. 20, University of Delaware, Newark.
17.
Taylor, P. H., and B. A. Williams, 2002, Wave statistics for intermediate depth water–NewWaves and symmetry, Proc. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, OMAE 28554.
18.
Tromans, P. S., 2002, A spectral response surface method for calculating crest elevation statistics, Proc. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, OMAE 28535.
19.
Tromans, P. S., Anaturk, A., and Hagemeijer, P., 1991, A new model for the kinematics of large ocean waves-application as a design wave, Proc. First Offshore and Polar Engineering Conf. (ISOPE), Vol. 3, Edinburgh, pp. 64–71.
20.
van Unen, R. F., van Beuzekom, A. A., Forristall, G. C., Mathisen, J.-P., and Starke, J., 1998, WACSIS–Wave crest sensor intercomparison study at the Meetpost Noordwijk measurement platform, Oceans ’98, IEEE.
21.
Zhang, J., 2002, Analysis of WACSIS Data Using Directional HWM, Proc. 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, Oslo, OMAE 28506.
22.
Zhang
,
J.
,
Yang
,
J.
,
Wen
,
J.
,
Prislin
,
I.
, and
Hong
,
K.
,
1999
,
Deterministic wave model for short-crested ocean waves: Part I. Theory and numerical scheme
,
Applied Ocean Research
,
21
,
167
188
.
You do not currently have access to this content.