Abstract

An overview of challenges within hydrodynamic verification of deep-water offshore structures is given first. The role of model testing in the verification, as well as a range of relevant measured responses, are discussed. Various solutions for experimental verification of deep-water structures are considered. In particular, the combination of model tests with truncated set-up and computer simulations—the hybrid approach—is discussed. Two basic groups of hybrid methods are identified: Active (on-line) and passive (off-line). Most published works are on passive systems, of which a particular method is described. Case study examples with this procedure are reviewed and discussed, and future challenges are commented.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
ocean waves, structural engineering, oil technology
Topics:
Computer simulation, Design, Mooring, Testing, Water, Pipeline risers, Risers (Casting), Damping
1.
Dyer, R. C., and Ahilan, R. V., 2000, “The Place of Physical and Hydrodynamic Models in Concept Design, Analysis and System Validation of Moored Floating Structures,” Paper No. OMAE2000/OSU OFT-4192, OMAE 2000 Conf., New Orleans, LA.
2.
Stansberg, C. T., Oritsland, O., and Kleiven, G., 2000, “VERIDEEP: Reliable Methods for Laboratory Verification of Mooring and Stationkeeping in Deep Water,” OTC Paper 12087, OTC 2000 Conf., Houston, TX.
3.
Stansberg, C. T., Yttervik, R., Oritsland, O., and Kleiven, G., 2000, “Hydrodynamic Model Test Verification of a Floating Platform System in 3000m Water Depth,” Proc. of 19th OMAE Conf., New Orleans, LA, Paper No. OMAE00-4145.
4.
Ward, E. G., Haring, R. E., and Devlin, P. V., 1999, “Deepwater Mooring and Riser Analysis for Depths to 10,000 Feet,” OTC 1999 Conf., Houston, TX, OTC Paper # 10808.
5.
ITTC, 1999, Report from the 22nd Int. Towing Tank Conf. (ITTC), Specialist Committee on Deep Water Mooring, Seoul, Korea and Shanghai, China, September 1999.
6.
Moxnes, S., and Larsen, K., 1998, “Ultra Small Scale Model Testing of a FPSO Ship,” Proc. of 17th OMAE Conf., Lisbon, Portugal, Paper No. OMAE98-0381.
7.
Buchner, B., Wichers, J. E. W., and de Wilde, J. J., 1999, “Features of the State-of-the-art Deepwater Offshore Basin,” Proc. of OTC 1999, Houston, TX, Paper No. 10841.
8.
Huse, E., Kleiven, G., and Nielsen, F. G., 1998, “Large Scale Model Testing of Deep Sea Risers,” Proc. of OTC 1998 Conf., Houston, TX, OTC Paper No. 8701.
9.
Grant, R. G., Litton, R. W., and Mamidipudi, P., 1999, “Highly Compliant (HCR) Riser Model Tests and Analysis,” Proc. of OTC 1999 Conf., Houston, TX, OTC Paper No. 10973.
10.
Clauss, G. F., and Vannahme, M., 1999, “An Experimental Study of the Nonlinear Dynamics of Floating Cranes,” Proc. of the 9th ISOPE Conf., Brest, France.
11.
Dercksen, A., and Wichers, J. E. W., 1992, “A Discrete Element Method on a Chain Turret Tanker Exposed to Survival Conditions,” Proc., Vol. 1, BOSS’92 Conf., London, UK, pp. 238–250.
12.
Oritsland, O., 1996, “VERIDEEP. Act. 2.4, Simplified Testing Techniques - Type I,” MARINTEK Report No. 513090.45.01, Trondheim, Norway.
13.
Chen, X, Zhang, J., and Ma, W., 1999, “Coupled Time-Domain Analysis of the Response of a Spar and Its Mooring System,” Proc. of the 9th ISOPE Conf., Vol. I, Brest, France, pp. 293–300.
14.
Kim, M. H., Ran, Z., Zheng, W., Bhat, S., and Beynet, P., 1999, “Hull/Mooring Coupled Dynamic Analysis of a Truss Spar in Time-Domain,” Proc. of the 9th ISOPE Conf., Vol. I, Brest, France, pp. 301–308.
15.
Chen, X., Zhang, J, Johnson, P., and Irani, M., 2000, “Studies on the Dynamics of Truncated Mooring Line,” Proc., Vol. II, the 10th ISOPE Conf., Seattle, WA, USA, pp. 94–101.
16.
Watts, S., 1999, “Hybrid Hydrodynamic Modelling,” J. Offshore Tech., pp. 13–17.
17.
Watts, S., 2000, “Simulation of Metocean Dynamics: Extension of the Hybrid Modelling Technique to Include Additional Environmenal Factors,” Presented at the SUT Workshop: Deepwater and Open Oceans, The Design Basis for Floaters, Houston, TX.
18.
Ormberg, H., Fylling, I. J., Larsen, K., and Sødahl, N., 1997, “Coupled Analysis of Vessel Motions and Mooring and Riser System Dynamics,” Proc. of the 16th OMAE Conf., Yokohama, Japan.
19.
Huse, E., 1991, “New Developments in Prediction of Mooring Line Damping,” OTC, Houston, Texas, OTC Paper No. 6593.
20.
Ormberg, H., Stansberg, C. T., Yttervik, R., and Kleiven, G., 1999, “Integrated Vessel Motion and Mooring Analysis Applied in Hybrid Model Testing,” Proc. of 9th ISOPE Conf., 1, Brest, France, pp. 339–346.
21.
Nestegard, A., and Krokstad, J. R., 1999, “JIP-DEEPER: Deepwater Analysis Tools,” Proc. of OTC 1999, Paper No. 10811, Houston, TX.
22.
Stansberg, C. T., 2001, “Data Interpretation and System Identification in Hydrodynamic Model Testing,” Proc. of 11th ISOPE Conf., Stavanger, Norway.
23.
Stansberg, C. T., Nielsen, F. G., and Yttervik, R., 1998, “Wave Drift Forces and Responses in Storm Waves,” Proc. of PRADS’98 Conf., The Hague, The Netherlands, pp. 1005–1012.
24.
WAMIT Version 5.0, 1993, “A Radiation-Diffraction Panel Program for Wave-Body Interaction,” Report, Dept. of Ocean Eng., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
25.
Dev, A. and Pinkster, J., 1997, “Viscous Mean and Low Frequency Drift Forces on Semisubmersibles,” Proc. of 8th BOSS Conf., Vol. 2, Delft, The Netherlands, pp. 351–365.
26.
Ormberg, H., and Stansberg, C. T., 2000, “Mooring and Design Verification of FPSO in 3000m Water Depth,” Proc. of DOT 2000 Conf., New Orleans, LA.
Copyright © 2002
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.