Abstract

Passive autocatalytic recombiners (PARs) are being used in most modern nuclear power plants (NPPs) for mitigating the hydrogen risk both in normal and accidental scenarios. Development of a systematic model of PARs based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) is the subject of this paper. 2D simulations of AREVA (a nuclear technology company) recombiner have been performed to validate PARs data and then the developed methodology has been applied to a Chashma NPP-II (C-2) recombiners to assess their performance. Two cases have been discussed; one with constant velocity at inlet and other one is devoted to the startup response of the PAR. Within the recombiner, the hydrogen and oxygen recombine on catalytic plates surface by an exothermic reaction to produce steam. Reaction heat is dissipated among the plates, surroundings and air inside the PAR. Flow inside the PAR will continue downwards until the gas absorbs enough heat to become lighter in weight than the gas outside the PAR. In addition, hydrogen accumulation in containment dome of a C-2 has been modeled and the results have been compared with methods for estimation of leakages and consequences of releases (melcor) code results. Without PARs, hydrogen got buildup within the containment dome, but when PARs are activated, hydrogen concentration first started to rise until the recombination reaction activated at about ∼2% hydrogen concentration. The comparison shows that the results obtained by the model agree well with the melcor results.

References

1.
Bentaib
,
A.
,
Meynet
,
N.
, and
Bleyer
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Overview on Hydrogen Risk Research and Development Activities: Methodology and Open Issues
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol.
,
47
(
1
), pp.
26
32
.10.1016/j.net.2014.12.001
2.
Payot
,
F.
,
Reinecke
,
E. A.
,
Morfin
,
F.
,
Sabroux
,
J. C.
,
Meynet
,
N.
,
Bentaib
,
A.
,
March
,
P.
, and
Zeyen
,
R.
,
2012
, “
Understanding of the Operation Behaviour of a Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner (PAR) for Hydrogen Mitigation in Realistic Containment Conditions During a Severe Light Water Nuclear Reactor (LWR) Accident
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
248
, pp.
178
196
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.03.042
3.
Rozeń
,
A.
,
2018
, “
Simulation of Start-Up Behaviour of a Passive Autocatalytic Hydrogen Recombiner
,”
Nukleonika
,
63
(
2
), pp.
27
41
.10.2478/nuka-2018-0004
4.
Snoeck
,
J.
,
Solaro
,
C.
, and
Moeyaert
,
P.
,
1997
, “
First Experience With the Installation of Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners
,” AECL, Villigen, Switzerland, Paper No: NEA/CSNI/R(96)8.
5.
Avakian
,
G.
, and
Braillard
,
O.
,
1999
, “
Theoretical Model of Hydrogen Recombiner for a Nuclear Power Plant
,”
7th International Conference on Nuclear Enginerring
, Tokyo, Japan, Apr.
9
23
.
6.
Rozeń
,
A.
,
2015
, “
A Mechanistic Model of a Passive Autocatalytic Hydrogen Recombiner
,”
Chem. Process Eng.
,
36
(
1
), pp.
3
19
.10.1515/cpe-2015-0001
7.
Visser
,
D. C.
,
Siccama
,
N. B.
,
Komen
,
E. M. J.
,
Keij
,
T. L. J.
, and
te Lintelo
,
J. G. T.
,
2015
, “
Hydrogen Risk assessment-CFD Model Validation and Reactor Scale Application
,”
Proc. 16th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics (NURETH-16)
, Chicago, IL, Aug. 30–Sept. 4, pp.
724
736
.
8.
Gera
,
B.
,
Sharma
,
P. K.
,
Singh
,
R. K.
, and
Vaze
,
K. K.
,
2011
, “
CFD Analysis of Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner
,”
Sci. Technol. Nucl. Instal.
,
2011
, pp.
1
9
.10.1155/2011/862812
9.
Orszulik
,
M.
,
Fic
,
A.
,
Bury
,
T.
, and
Składzień
,
J.
,
2013
, “
A Model of Hydrogen Passive Autocatalytic Recombiner and Its Validation Via CFD Simulations
,”
Arch. Thermodyn.
,
34
(
4
), pp.
257
266
.10.2478/aoter-2013-0042
10.
Dehjourian
,
M.
,
Sayareh
,
R.
,
Rahgoshay
,
M.
,
Jahanfarnia
,
G.
, and
Shirani
,
A. S.
,
2016
, “
Investigation of a Hydrogen Mitigation System During Large Break Loss-Of-Coolant Accident for a Two-Loop Pressurized Water Reactor
,”
Nucl. Eng. Technol.
,
48
(
5
), pp.
1174
1183
.10.1016/j.net.2016.04.002
11.
Hoyes
,
J. R.
, and
Ivings
,
M. J.
,
2016
, “
CFD Modelling of Hydrogen Stratification in Enclosures: Model Validation and Application to PAR Performance
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
310
, pp.
142
153
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2016.08.036
12.
Prabhudharwadkar
,
D. M.
,
Iyer
,
K. N.
,
Mohan
,
N.
,
Bajaj
,
S. S.
, and
Markandeya
,
S. G.
,
2011
, “
Simulation of Hydrogen Distribution in an Indian Nuclear Reactor Containment
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
241
(
3
), pp.
832
842
.10.1016/j.nucengdes.2010.11.012
13.
Nawaz
,
R.
,
Khan
,
S. W.
, and
Qureshi
,
K. R.
,
2019
, “
CFD Analysis of Passive Autocatalytic Recombiners
,”
Fourth International Conference on Power Generation Systems and Renewable Energy Technologies, PGSRET
, Islamabad, Sept.
10
12
.
14.
Schefer
,
R. W.
,
1982
, “
Catalyzed Combustion of H2/Air Mixtures in a Flat Plate Boundary Layer: II. Numerical Model
,”
Combust. Flame
,
45
(
C
), pp.
171
190
.10.1016/0010-2180(82)90043-8
15.
Chashma Nuclear Power Plant
,
2009
,
Final Safety Analysis Report
,
Chashma
,
Punjab, Pakistan
, Report No.
7783
84
.
16.
Şahin
,
S.
, and
Sarwar
,
M. S.
, April
2013
, “
Hydrogen Hazard and Mitigation Analysis in PWR Containment
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
58
, pp.
132
140
.10.1016/j.anucene.2013.03.001
You do not currently have access to this content.