Abstract

While processing the signals from radiation detectors, for finding the true mean-count-rate, algorithms with hybrid pulse collection methodology have been proposed and used over the years. An algorithm based on this technique with a new methodology of adoption and implementation including spurious rejection is proposed here. It enables a specified and controllable error when the mean-count-rate remains within certain predefined limits from its true value. Effort is made to optimize the response time of prediction at low count rates preserving the optimum possible relative-standard-deviation (RSD). Chi-squared test is utilized for verifying the counting system to check if the observed fluctuations are consistent with the expected statistical fluctuations. A C-program code has been developed to test the algorithm. An observed set of detector outputs are given as input to the program and the corresponding Output is analyzed. A comparative study between the proposed method and floating-mean method is presented for the same set of observations. A typical short-lived high voltage (HV) induced spurious noise pattern is fed as input to the program verifying limited-spurious rejection capability of the algorithm. An embedded C program was written for microcontroller implementation of the algorithm. Case-study of a neutron roentgen equivalent man (REM) counter is presented for evaluating response time for various ranges of operation with calculation of RSD at these ranges. This general-purpose algorithm can enhance the read-out accuracy of radiation monitors used for radiation safety applications.

References

1.
IAEA,
1986
,
Selected Topics in Nuclear Electronics
,
IAEA
,
Vienna, Austria
, Standard No. TEC DOC-363
.
2.
Huffman
,
R. K.
,
1999
, “
Microprocessor Implementation of a Time Variant Floating Mean Counting Algorithm
,”
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A
,
431
(
3
), pp.
556
562
.10.1016/S0168-9002(99)00347-2
3.
Arandjelović
,
V.
,
Koturović
,
A.
, and
Vukanovic
,
R.
,
2002
, “
A Software Method for Suppressing Statistical Fluctuations in Preset Count Digital Rate Meter Algorithms
,”
IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.
,
49
(
5
), pp.
2561
2566
.10.1109/TNS.2002.803928
4.
BIPM
,
2008
, “
Uncertainty of Measurement—Part 3: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, (GUM:1995)
,” 1st ed., ISO, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO/IEC GUIDE 98-3:2008(E).
5.
Knoll
,
G. F.
,
1989
, “
Counting Statistics & Error Prediction
,”
Radiation Detection and Measurement
, 2nd ed.,
Wiley
,
New York
, p.
84
.
6.
Ahmed
,
S. N.
,
2007
, “
Essential Statistics for Data Analysis
,”
Physics and Engineering of Radiation Detection
,
Queen's University
,
Kingston, ON
, Canada, Elsevier/Atomic Press/Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA, pp.
525
570
.
7.
Wuensch
,
K. L.
,
2011
, “
Chi-Square Tests
,”
International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science
,
M.
Lovric
, ed.,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
8.
Brunzendorf
,
J.
, and
Behrens
,
R.
,
2006
, “
How to Type Test the Coefficient of Variation of an Indication
,”
Radiat. Prot. Dosim.
,
123
(
1
), pp.
21
31
.10.1093/rpd/ncl078
You do not currently have access to this content.