Due to powerful geometry treatment capability, method of characteristics (MOC) currently becomes one of the best method to solve neutron transport equation. In MOC method, boundary condition treatment, complex geometry representation, and advanced acceleration method are the key techniques to develop a powerful MOC code to solve complex problem. In this paper, we developed a powerful MOC module, which can treat different boundary conditions with two methods. For problems with special border shapes and boundary condition, such as rectangle, 1/8 of square, hexagon, 1/3 of hexagon, 1/6 of hexagon problems with reflection, rotation, and translation boundary condition, the MOC module adopts periodic tracking method, with which rays can return to start point after a certain distance. For problems with general border shapes, the MOC module uses ray prolongation method, which can treat arbitrary border shapes and boundary conditions. Meanwhile, graphic user interface based on computer aided design (CAD) software is developed to generate the geometry description file, in which geometry is represented by “lines and arcs” method. With the graphic user interface, the geometry and mesh can be described and modified correctly and fast. In order to accelerate the MOC transport calculation, the generalized coarse mesh finite difference (GCMFD) is used, which can use irregular coarse mesh diffusion method to accelerate the transport equation. The MOC module was incorporated into advanced neutronics lattice code KYLIN-2, which was developed by Nuclear Power Institute of China (NPIC) and used to simulate the assembly of current pressurized water reactor (PWR) and advanced reactors, to solve the transport equation with multigroup energy structure in cross sections database. The numerical results show that the KYLIN-2 code can be used to calculate 2D neutron transport problems in reactor accurately and fast. In future, the KYLIN-2 code will be released and gradually become the main neutron transport lattice code in NPIC.

References

1.
Huang
,
S. E.
,
2006
, “
Research on the Subgroup Method for Treating Multiple-Complexity Neutron Resonance Problem
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
2.
She
,
D.
,
Wang
,
K.
, and
Yu
,
G.
,
2013
, “
Development of the Point-Depletion Code DEPTH
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
258
(
17
), pp.
235
240
.
3.
Sanchez
,
R.
,
Mao
,
L.
, and
Santandrea
,
S.
,
2002
, “
Treatment of Boundary Conditions in Trajectory-Based Deterministic Transport Methods
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
140
(
1
), pp.
23
50
.
4.
Chai
,
X. M.
,
Yao
,
D.
, and
Wang
,
K.
,
2010
, “
Three Dimension Neutron Transport Characteristics Method Code. Pt. 1: Interpolation Treatment of Boundary Condition
,”
Nucl. Power Eng.
,
31
(
2
), pp.
11
15
(in Chinese).
5.
Jevremovic
,
T.
,
Vujic
,
J.
, and
Tsuda
,
K.
,
2001
, “
ANEMONA—A Neutron Transport Code for General Geometry Reactor Assemblies Based on the Method of Characteristics and R-Function Solid Modeler
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
28
(
2
), pp.
125
152
.
6.
Hong
,
S. G.
, and
Cho
,
N. Z.
,
1998
, “
CRX: A Code For Rectangular and Hexagonal Lattices Based on Method of Characteristics
,”
Ann. Nucl. Energy
,
25
(
8
), pp.
547
565
.
7.
Suslov
,
I.
,
2001
, “
Improvements in the Long Characteristics Method and Their Efficiency for Deep Penetration Calculations
,”
Prog. Nucl. Energy
,
39
(
2
), pp.
233
243
.
8.
Smith
,
K. S.
, and
Rhodes
,
J. D.
,
2002
, “
Full-Core, 2-D, LWR Core Calculations With CASMO-4E
,” International Conference on the New Frontiers of Nuclear Technology: Reactor Physics, Safety and High-Performance Computing (PHYSOR 2002), Seoul, Korea, Oct. 7–10, Session 13A-02.
9.
Zhong
,
Z. P.
,
Downar
,
T. J.
,
Xu
,
Y.
, and
Dehart
,
D.
,
2008
, “
Implementation of Two-Level Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference Acceleration in an Arbitrary Geometry, Two-Dimensional Discrete Ordinates Transport Method
,”
Nucl. Sci. Eng.
,
158
(
3
), pp.
289
298
.
10.
Chai
,
X. M.
,
Yao
,
D.
, and
Wang
,
K.
,
2010
, “
Generalized Coarse-Mesh Finite Difference Acceleration for the Method of Characteristics
,”
Advances in Reactor Physics to Power the Nuclear Renaissance
(PHYSOR 2010), Pittsburgh, PA, May 9–14, American Nuclear Society, LaGrange Park, IL.
11.
Halsall
,
M. J.
,
1980
, “
CACTUS, A Characteristic Solution to the Neutron Transport Equation in Complicated Geometries
,” United Kingdom Atomic Energy Establishment, Winfrith, UK, Report No. AEEW-R 1291.
12.
Postma
,
T.
, and
Vujic
,
J.
,
1999
, “
The Method of Characteristics in General Geometry With Anisotropic Scattering
,”
International Conference on Mathematics and Computation, Reactor Physics and Environmental Analysis in Nuclear Application
, Madrid, Spain, Sept. 27–30.
13.
Stepanek
,
J.
,
Auerbach
,
T.
, and
Haelg
,
W.
,
1983
, “
Calculation of Four Thermal Reactor Benchmark, Problems in X-Y Geometry
,” Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, EPRI Report No. NP-2855.
14.
Wood
,
J.
, and
Williams
,
M. M. R.
,
1984
, “
Recent Progress in the Application of the Finite Element Method to the Neutron Transport Equation
,”
Prog. Nucl. Energy
,
14
(
1
), pp.
21
40
.
15.
OECD
,
2003
, “
Benchmark on Deterministic Transport Calculations Without Spatial Homogenisation: A 2-D/3-D MOX Fuel Assembly Benchmark
,” Nuclear Science, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, OECD Report No.
NEA/NSC/DOC(2003)16
.
16.
She
,
D.
,
2013
, “
Research on the Burnup and Source Convergence With the Reactor Monte Carlo Code RMC
,” Ph.D. dissertation, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
You do not currently have access to this content.