Fig. 1 Fabrication scheme used for nanowires-integrated microfluidic channel. ( a ) PDMS channel is created by using standard soft lithography. Metallic glass nanowires on Si are fabricated by thermoplastic drawing from predefined cavities. The PDMS channel and the Si substrate with nanowires are ... More about this image found in Fabrication scheme used for nanowires-integrated microfluidic channel. ( a ...

Fig. 2 Microfluidic channels with different nanowire shapes and their flow behavior. ( a ) Comparison of microfluidic channel with no wires and theoretical flowrate calculated using HP equation, ( b ) microfluidic channel with conical nanowires. The SEM image shows the tapered shape of the nanowir... More about this image found in Microfluidic channels with different nanowire shapes and their flow behavio...

Fig. 3 Cross-sectional velocity contour plots of various microfluidic channel configurations. Only half of the rectangular channel was simulated due to symmetry. ( a ) Velocity distribution in a channel with no wires exhibits parabolic profile, ( b ) velocity distribution around cylindrical pillar... More about this image found in Cross-sectional velocity contour plots of various microfluidic channel conf...

Fig. 4 Surface decoration of metallic glass nanowires using coated Si molds for thermoplastic drawing. ( a ) Schematic illustration of material transfer from Si mold to metallic glass nanowires during drawing and ( b ) SEM images of drawn Pt-based metallic glass wire decorated with multiwall CNTs ... More about this image found in Surface decoration of metallic glass nanowires using coated Si molds for th...

Fig. 1 Electroplating setup demonstrating electrodes, electrolyte flow, and schematical representation of magnetic field generated around the electrode More about this image found in Electroplating setup demonstrating electrodes, electrolyte flow, and schema...

Fig. 2 The effect of MF on the thickness of the deposited Ni layer for different CD with combination of different FR and IG: ( a ) 4 ml/min–0.35 mm, ( b ) 4 ml/min–0.45 mm, ( c ) 4.5 ml/min–0.35 mm, and ( d ) 4.5 ml/min–0.45 mm More about this image found in The effect of MF on the thickness of the deposited Ni layer for different C...

Fig. 3 Pareto chart of standardized effects of different factors and combination of factors on deposition thickness More about this image found in Pareto chart of standardized effects of different factors and combination o...

Fig. 4 The effect of MF on the mean peak height S a of the deposited Ni layer for different CD with combination of different FR and IG: ( a ) 4 ml/min–0.35 mm, ( b ) 4 ml/min–0.45 mm, ( c )4.5 ml/min–0.35 mm, and ( d ) 4.5 ml/min–0.45 mm More about this image found in The effect of MF on the mean peak height S a of the deposited Ni layer f...

Fig. 5 The effect of MF on the mean CA of the deposited Ni layer for different CD with combination of different FR and IG: ( a ) 4 ml/min–0.35 mm, ( b ) 4 ml/min–0.45 mm, ( c ) 4.5 ml/min–0.35 mm, and ( d ) 4.5 ml/min–0.45 mm More about this image found in The effect of MF on the mean CA of the deposited Ni layer for different CD ...

Fig. 6 Pareto chart of standardized effects of different factors and combination of factors for contact angle More about this image found in Pareto chart of standardized effects of different factors and combination o...

Fig. 7 A representative sessile drop test showing a hydrophilic surface created under the influence of the magnetic field More about this image found in A representative sessile drop test showing a hydrophilic surface created un...