The goal of fabricating functional prototypes quickly is hindered by a mismatch of material properties between production materials and those used in rapid prototyping (RP) machines, such as stereolithography. Even when rapid tooling (RT) technologies are utilized for injection molded parts, differences in mold materials cause differences in molded part properties. To compensate for these material and process differences, a design for manufacturing (DFM) method is introduced, called geometric tailoring. The idea is to modify dimensions of prototype parts to match key characteristics of production parts, such as stress and deflection behaviors. For RP parts, the geometric tailoring DFM method integrates two sub-problems, one for achieving functional requirements by matching part behaviors, and one for RP process planning to incorporate manufacturing capabilities and limitations. For parts fabricated by RT, an additional sub-problem is integrated, namely injection molding process planning. Problem decomposition is critical due to the coupled nature of the sub-problems. A problem decomposition and solution procedure is presented. The geometric tailoring method is shown to enable the matching of prototype to production part behaviors, while improving manufacturability.

Issue Section:
Technical Papers
Keywords:
design for manufacture, process planning, injection moulding, rapid prototyping (industrial)
Topics:
Design, Design for Manufacturing, Dimensions, Engineering prototypes, Geometry, Manufacturing, Materials properties, Production planning, Rapid prototyping, Rapid tooling, Stress, Machinery, Injection molding, Young's modulus, Finishes, Weight (Mass), Displacement, Tensile strength
1.
Cedorge
,
T.
,
LeBaut
,
Y.
,
Palmer
,
A.
, and
Colton
,
J. S.
, 2000, “Design Rules for Stereolithography Injection Molding Inserts,” CIRP Ann., 30(2).
2.
http://www.dow.com/engineeringplastics/prod/na/mag.htm Magnum 9010, medium impact, Dow Chemical Company.
3.
http://www.renshape.com/ourProducts/stereolithography/stereolithography.asp
4.
Dawson, K., 2001, “The Effects of Rapid Tooling on Final Product Properties,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta.
5.
Rosen, D. W., Chen, Y., Gerhard, J., Allen, J. K., and Mistree, F., 2000, “Design Decision Templates and Their Implementation for Distributed Design and Fabrication,” ASME Design Automation Conference, paper #DETC00/DAC-14293, Baltimore, Sept. 10–13.
6.
Poli
,
C.
,
Escudero
,
J.
, and
Fernandez
,
F.
,
1988
, “
How Part Design Affects Injection Molding Tool Costs
,”
Mach. Des.
,
24
,
Nov.
Nov.
.
7.
Pye, R. G. W., 1989, Injection Mould Design, Longman Scientific & Technical.
8.
Boothroyd, G., and Dewhurst, P., 1991, “Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly,” Design for Manufacture: Strategies, Principles and Techniques, J. Corbett, M. Dooner, and C. Pym, eds., Addison Wesley.
9.
Bralla, J. G., 1998, Design for Manufacturability Handbook, McGraw-Hill.
10.
Poli
,
C.
,
Dastidar
,
P.
,
Mahajan
,
P.
, and
Graves
,
R.
,
1993
, “
Design for Stamping—Analysis of Part Attributes That Impact Die Construction Costs for Metal Stampings
,”
ASME J. Mech. Des.
,
115
, pp.
735
–
743
, December.
11.
Beiter, K., and Ishii, K., 1996, “Incorporating Dimensional Requirements Into Material Selection and Design of Injection Molded Parts,” 1996 ASME Design Automation Conference, paper #96-DETC/DAC-1494, Sept., Irvine, CA.
12.
Baker, W. E., Westine, P. S., and Dodge, F. T., 1991, Similarity Methods and Engineering Dynamics: Theory and Practice of Scale Modeling, Elsevier, New York.
13.
Cho, U., Wood, K. L., and Crawford, R. H., 1999, “Error Measures for Functional Product Testing,” ASME Design for Manufacturing Conference, Paper #DETC99/DFM-8913, Sept. 12–16, Las Vegas.
14.
Mistree, F., Hughes, O. F., and Bras, B. A., 1993. “The Compromise Decision Support Problem and the Adaptive Linear Programming Algorithm,” Structural Optimization: Status and Promise, Washington, D.C., M. P. K., ed., pp. 247–289.
15.
Chen, W., Allen, J. K., and Mistree, F., 1997, “The Robust Concept Exploration Method for Enhancing Concurrent Systems Design,” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 5(3), pp. 203–217.
16.
Myers, R. H., and Montgomery, D. C., 1995, Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
17.
Hernandez
,
G.
,
Allen
,
J. K.
, and
Mistree
,
F.
,
2001
, “
The Compromise Decision Support Problem: Modeling The Deviation Function As In Physical Programming
,”
Eng. Optimiz.
,
33
(
4
), pp.
445
–
471
, April.
18.
Lynn-Charney
,
C. M.
, and
Rosen
,
D. W.
,
2000
, “
Accuracy Models and Their Use in Stereolithography Process Planning
,”
Rapid Prototyping Journal
,
6
(
2
), pp.
77
–
86
.
19.
Sambu, S. P., 2001, “A Design for Manufacture Method for Rapid Prototyping and Rapid Tooling,” Masters Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology.
20.
West
,
A. P.
,
Sambu
,
S.
, and
Rosen
,
D. W.
,
2001
, “
A Process Planning Method for Improving Build Performance in Stereolithography
,”
Comput.-Aided Des.
,
33
(
1
), pp.
65
–
80
.
21.
Chen, Y., 2001, “Computer-Aided Design for Rapid Tooling: Methods for Mold Design and Design-for-Manufacture,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.
Copyright © 2004
 by ASME
You do not currently have access to this content.