Ultrasonic additive manufacturing (UAM) is an emerging solid-state fabrication process that can be used for layered creation of solid metal structures. In UAM, ultrasonic energy is used to induce plastic deformation and nascent surface formation at the interface between layers of metal foil, thus creating bonding between the layers. UAM is an inherently stochastic process with a number of unknown facets that can affect the bond quality. In order to take advantage of the unique benefits of UAM, it is necessary to understand the relationship between manufacturing parameters (machine settings) and bond quality by quantifying the mechanical strength of UAM builds. This research identifies the optimum combination of processing parameters, including normal force, oscillation amplitude, weld speed, and number of bilayers for the manufacture of commercially pure, grade 1 $titanium+1100-O$ aluminum composites. A multifactorial experiment was designed to study the effect of the above factors on the outcome measures ultimate shear strength and ultimate transverse tensile strength. Generalized linear models were used to study the statistical significance of each factor. For a given factor, the operating levels were selected to cover the full range of machine capabilities. Transverse shear and transverse tensile experiments were conducted to quantify the bond strength of the builds. Optimum levels of each parameter were established based on statistical contrast trend analyses. The results from these analyses indicate that high mechanical strength can be achieved with a process window bounded by a 1500 N normal force, $30 μm$ oscillation amplitude, about 42 mm/s weld speed, and two bilayers. The effects of each process parameter on bond strength are discussed and explained.

1.
Graff
,
K.
, 2005,
,
,
Cambridge, England
.
2.
Kong
,
C. Y.
,
Soar
,
R. C.
, and
Dickens
,
P. M.
, 2004, “
Optimum Process Parameters for Ultrasonic Consolidation of 3003 Aluminium
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
146
(
2
), pp.
181
187
.
3.
Kong
,
C. Y.
, and
Soar
,
R. C.
, 2005, “
Fabrication of Metal-Matrix Composites and Adaptive Composites Using Ultrasonic Consolidation Process
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
412
(
1–2
), pp.
12
18
.
4.
Siggard
,
E.
, 2007, “
Investigative Research Into the Structural Embedding of Electrical and Mechanical Systems Using Ultrasonic Consolidation
,” MS thesis, Utah State University, Logan, UT.
5.
White
,
D. R.
, 2003, “
Ultrasonic Consolidation of Aluminum Tooling
,”
0935-9648,
161
(
1
), pp.
64
65
.
6.
Kulakov
,
M.
, and
Rack
,
H. J.
, 2009, “
Control of 3003-H18 Aluminum Ultrasonic Consolidation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
0094-4289,
131
, p.
021006
.
7.
Kong
,
C. Y.
,
Soar
,
R. C.
, and
Dickens
,
P. M.
, 2003, “
Characterisation of Aluminium Alloy 6061 for the Ultrasonic Consolidation Process
,”
Mater. Sci. Eng., A
0921-5093,
363
(
1–2
), pp.
99
106
.
8.
Montgomery
,
D. C.
, 1991,
Design and Analysis of Experiments
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
9.
Dean
,
A.
, and
Voss
,
D.
, 1999,
Design and Analysis of Experiments
,
Springer
,
New York
.
10.
SAS Institute, Inc.
, 2004, SAS 9.1, Cary, NC.
11.
Li
,
D.
, and
Soar
,
R.
, 2009, “
Influence of Sonotrode Texture on the Performance of an Ultrasonic Consolidation Machine and the Interfacial Bond Strength
,”
J. Mater. Process. Technol.
0924-0136,
209
, pp.
1627
1634
.
12.
Yang
,
Y.
,
Janaki Ram
,
G. D.
, and
Stucker
,
B. E.
, 2007, “
An Experimental Determination of Optimum Processing Parameters for Al/SiC Metal Matrix Composites Made Using Ultrasonic Consolidation
,”
ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol.
0094-4289,
129
, pp.
538
549
.
13.
Janaki Ram
,
G. D.
,
Yang
,
Y.
,
George
,
J.
,
Robinson
,
C.
, and
Stucker
,
B.
, 2006, “
Improving Linear Weld Density in Ultrasonically Consolidated Parts
,”
Proceedings of the 17th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium
, Austin, TX.
14.
Joshi
,
K. C.
, 1971, “
The Formation of Ultrasonic Bonds Between Metals
,”
Welding Journal
0043-2296,
50
(
12
), pp.
840
848
.