In the current work it is proposed a simple, and fast softwired tool wear monitoring approach, based upon the features of the time series analysis and the Green’s Function (GF) features. The proposed technique involves the decomposition of the force signals into deterministic component and stochastic variation-carrying component. Then, only the stochastic component is processed to detect the adequate autoregressive moving average (ARMA) models representing the tool state at every wear condition. Models are further reduced to form a more representative parameter, the “Green’s Function (GF).” This reflects the dynamic behavior of the tool prior to failure and, may provide a comprehensive and accurate measure of the damping variation of the cutting process subsystem at different forms of tool’s edge wear. As wear enters the high rate region, the cutting process is forced toward the instability domain where it tends to have less damping resistance. It is also explained how a system response surface can be generated based on its Green’s function. It is proposed that this concept can be the basis for a diagnostic technique for use with many systems.

1.
Dimla
,
J. R.
,
Lister
,
D. E.
, and
Leighton
,
N. J.
, 1991, “
Neural Network Solution to the Tool Condition Monitoring Problem in Metal Cutting: A Critical Review of Methods
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
37
, pp.
1219
1241
.
2.
Dan
,
L.
, and
Mathew
,
J.
, 1990, “
Tool Wear and Failure Monitoring Techniques for Turning: A Review
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
30
, pp.
579
598
.
3.
Oraby
,
S. E.
, and
Hayhurst
,
D. R.
, 2004, “
Tool Life Determination Based on the Measurement of Wear and Tool Force Ratio Variation
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
44
, pp.
1261
1269
.
4.
Oraby
,
S. E.
, 1995, “
Monitoring of Machining Processes via Force Signals. Part I: Recognition of Different Tool Failure Forms by Spectral Analysis
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
33
, pp.
133
143
.
5.
Oraby
,
S. E.
,
Alaskari
,
A. M.
, and
Almeshaiei
,
E. A.
, 2004, “
Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Surface Roughness—Tool Wear Correlation in Turning Operations, Kuwait Journal of Science & Engineering (KJSE), An Int. J. of Kuwait University
,” Vol.
31
, No. 1, pp.
219
244
.
6.
Oraby
,
S. E.
, and
Hayhurst
,
D. R.
, 1997, “
Development of Models for Tool Wear Force Relationships in Metal Cutting
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
0020-7403,
33
, pp.
125
138
.
7.
Choudhury
,
S. K.
, and
Kishore
,
K. K.
, 2000, “
Tool Wear in Turning using Force Ratio
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
40
, pp.
899
909
.
8.
Jae-Woong
,
Youn
,
Min-Yang
,
Yang
, 2001, “
A Study on the Relationships Between Static/Dynamic Cutting Force Components and Tool Wear
,”
J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
1087-1357,
123
, pp.
196
205
.
9.
Kumar
,
S. A.
,
Ravindra
,
H. V.
, and
Srinivasa
,
Y. G.
, 1997, “
In-Process Tool Wear Monitoring through Time Series Modeling and Pattern Recognition
,”
Int. J. Prod. Res.
0020-7543,
35
, pp.
739
751
.
10.
Pandit
,
S. M.
, and
Wu
,
S. M.
, 1983,
Time Series and System Analysis, With Applications
,
Wiley
, New York.
11.
Wu
,
S. M.
, 1990, “
Dynamic Data System: A New Modeling Approach
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
112
, pp.
708
714
.
12.
Pandit
,
S. M.
, and
Kashou
,
S.
, 1982, “
A Data Dependent Systems Strategy of On-Line Tool Wear Sensing
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
104
, pp.
217
223
.
13.
Pandit
,
S. M.
, and
Kashou
,
S.
, 1983, “
Variation in Friction Coefficient with Tool Wear
,”
Wear
0043-1648,
84
, pp.
65
79
.
14.
Oraby
,
S. E.
, and
Hayhurst
,
D. R.
, 1991, “
Tool Wear Detection Using the System Dynamic Characteristics
,” in
Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Behaviour of Materials in Machining—Advanced Machining for Quality and Productivity
, The Institute of Metals, York, England, pp.
39
55
.
15.
Bandyopadhyay
,
P.
,
Gonzalez
,
E. M.
,
Huang
,
R.
, and
Wu
,
S. M.
, 1986, “
A Feasibility Study of On-Line Drill Wear Monitoring by DDS Methodology
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tool Des. Res.
0020-7357,
26
, pp.
245
257
.
16.
Olgac
,
N.
, and
Guttermuth
,
J. R.
, 1988, “
A Simplified Identification Method for Autoregressive Models of Cutting Force Dynamics
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
110
, pp.
288
296
.
17.
Altintas
,
Y.
, 1988, “
In-Process Detection of Tool Breakage using Time Series Monitoring of Cutting Forces
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
28
, pp.
157
172
.
18.
Lan
,
M. S.
, and
Naerheim
,
Y.
, 1986, “
In-Process Detection of Tool Breakage in Milling
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
108
, pp.
191
196
.
19.
Richter
,
F.
, and
Spiewak
,
S. A.
, 1989, “
A System for On-line Detection and Prediction of Catastrophic Tool Failure in Milling
,” in
Proceedings of the 17th NAMRC
, pp.
137
143
.
20.
Pandit
,
S. M.
, and
Weber
,
C. R.
, 1990, “
Image Decomposition by Data Dependent Systems
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
0022-0817,
112
, pp.
286
292
.
21.
Oraby
,
S. E.
, and
Hayhurst
,
D. R.
, 1991, “
High-Capacity Compact Three-Component Cutting Force Dynamometer
,”
Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf.
0890-6955,
30
, pp.
125
138
.
You do not currently have access to this content.