In any cutting processes, the temperature distribution in the cutting tool is intrinsically three-dimensional and very steep temperature gradient can be generated in the vicinity of the tool-chip interface. In this region, where the maximum temperature occurs, the effect of temperature dependent thermal properties may become important. The full three-dimensional nonlinear transient heat conduction equation is solved numerically using a control volume approach to study these nonlinear effects on cutting tool temperatures. The extremely small size of the heat input zone (tool-chip interface), relative to the tool insert rake surface area, requires the mesh to be dense enough in order to obtain accurate solutions. This usually requires very intensive computational efforts. Due to the size of the discretized domain, an optimized algorithm is used in the solution of the problem to significantly reduce the required computing time. This numerical model can be used for process development in an industrial setting. The effect of two different heat flux input profiles, a spatially uniform plane heat flux and a spatially nonuniform parabolic heat flux at the tool-chip interface, on the tool temperatures are also investigated in the present study. Some recommendations are given regarding the condition when these nonlinear effects cannot be ignored.

1.
Barrow
,
G.
,
1973
, “
A Review of Experimental and Theoretical Techniques for Assessing Cutting Temperatures
,”
CIRP Ann.
,
22
, pp.
203
211
.
2.
Boothroyd, G., and Knight, W. A. , 1989, Fundamentals of Machining and Machine Tools, Marcel and Dekker, New York, Chap. 3.
3.
Chandra
,
A.
, and
Chan
,
C. L.
,
1994
, “
Thermal Aspects of Machining: A BEM Approach
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
33, ppp.
1657
1693
.
4.
Shaw, M. C., 1984, Metal Cutting Principles, Oxford University Press, Oxford, Chap. 12.
5.
Stephenson
,
D. A.
,
1991
, “
Assessment of Steady-State Metal Cutting Temperature Models Based on Simultaneous Infrared and Thermocouple Data
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
113
, pp.
121
128
.
6.
Strenkowski
,
J. S.
, and
Moon
,
K. J.
,
1990
, “
Finite Element Prediction of Chip Geometry and Tool/Workpiece Temperature Distribution in Orthogonal Machining
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
112
, pp.
313
318
.
7.
Trigger
,
K. J.
, and
Chao
,
B. T.
,
1951
, “
An Analytical Evaluation of Metal Cutting Temperatures
,”
Trans. ASME
,
73
, pp.
57
68
.
8.
Jen
,
T. C.
, and
Anagonye
,
A. U.
,
2001
, “
An Improved Transient Model of Tool Temperature in Metal Cutting
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
123
, pp.
30
37
.
9.
Radulescu
,
R.
, and
Kapor
,
S. G.
,
1994
, “
An Analytical Model for Prediction of Tool Temperature Fields during Continuous and Interrupted Cutting
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
116
, pp.
135
143
.
10.
Stephenson
,
D. A.
, and
Ali
,
A.
,
1992
, “
Tool Temperature in Interrupted Metal Cutting
,”
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
115
, pp.
432
437
.
11.
Stephenson
,
D. A.
,
Jen
,
T. C.
, and
Lavine
,
A. S.
,
1997
, “
Cutting Tool Temperatures in Contour Turning: Transient Analysis and Experimental Verification
,”
ASME J. Manuf. Sci. Eng.
,
119
, pp.
494
501
.
12.
Jen, T. C., and Gutierrez, G., 1999, “Finite Element Analysis in Transient Tool Temperatures,” National Heat Transfer Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
13.
Tay
,
A. O.
,
Stevenson
,
M. G.
, and
Vahl Davis
,
G.
,
1973
, “
Using the Finite Element Method to Determine Temperature Distributions in Orthogonal Machining
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
118
, pp.
627
638
.
14.
Maekawa
,
K.
,
Nakano
,
Y.
, and
Kitawa
,
T.
,
1996
, “
Finite Element Analysis of Thermal Behavior in Metal Machining
,”
Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng.
, ,
62
, No.
596
, pp.
1587
1593
.
15.
Jen, T. C., and Lavine, A. S., 1994, “Prediction of Tool Temperatures in Interrupted Metal Cutting,” Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Transport Phenomena in Manufacturing Processes, pp. 211–216.
16.
Chao
,
B. T.
, and
Trigger
,
K. J.
,
1955
, “
Temperature Distribution at the Tool-Chip Interface in Metal Cutting
,”
Trans. ASME
,
77
, pp.
1107
1121
.
17.
Levy
,
E. K.
,
Tsai
,
C. L.
, and
Groover
,
M. P.
, 1976, “Analytical Investigation of the Effect of Tool Wear on the Temperature Variations in a Metal Cutting Tool,” ASME J. Eng. Ind., February, pp. 251–257.
18.
Tsai, C. L., 1973, “Finite Difference Solutions for the Time Dependent Temperature Distributions in Metal Cutting Tool,” MS thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University.
19.
Incropera, F. P., and DeWitt, D. P., 1996, Introduction to Heat Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
20.
Jen, T. C., and Gutierrez, G., 2000, “Numerical Heat Transfer Analysis in Transient Tool Temperatures,” National Heat Transfer Conference, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
21.
Van der Vorst, H. A., and Sonneveld, P, 1990, CGSTAB, A More Smoothly Converging Variant of CGS, Tech. report 90-50, Delf University of Technology.
22.
Glub, G. H., and van Loan, C., 1990, Matrix Computations, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
23.
Ferzeiger, J. H., and Peric, M., 1997, Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
24.
Eapen, S., 2000, “Numerical Heat Transfer Analysis in Three Dimensional Transient Cutting Tool Temperatures,” MS thesis, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
25.
Trent, E. M., 1977, Metal Cutting, Butterworths, Chapter 5.
You do not currently have access to this content.