The design of joints between parts is one of the most critical issues in the design of sheet metal assemblies. This paper presents a new part-to-part joint design evaluation index developed for dimensional control of sheet metal assemblies. The proposed index provides a new analytical tool to address the dimensional capabilities of an assembly process in the early product design stage. It covers the three basic types of joints, which encompass the whole domain of joints used in sheet metal assembly. The part-to-part interactions for each type of joint are studied, and an analytical model is provided. Two evaluation indices, (1) product joint design evaluation and (2) critical part determination, are developed. The developed methodology is demonstrated using two industrial design examples of sport-utility automotive bodies.
Issue Section:
Research Papers
1.
Ayres
R. U.
1988
, “Complexity, Reliability, and Design: Manufacturing Implications
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 1
, No. 1
, pp. 26
–35
.2.
Barkan
P.
Hinckley
C. M.
1993
, “The Benefits and Limitations of Structured Design Methodologies
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 6
, No. 3
, pp. 211
–220
.3.
Bjorke, O., 1989, Computer-Aided Tolerancing, ASME Press, New York, 1989.
4.
Boothroyd, G., 1987, “Design for Assembly—The Key to Design for Manufacture,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 2, No. 3.
5.
Ceglarek, D., 1994, “Knowledge-Based Diagnosis for Automotive Body Assembly: Methodology and Implementation,” Ph. D. Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
6.
Ceglarek
D.
Shi
J.
1995
, “Dimensional Variation Reduction for Automotive Body Assembly Manufacturing
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 8
, No. 2
, pp. 139
–154
.7.
Ceglarek
D.
Shi
J.
Wu
S. M.
1994
, “A Knowledge-based Diagnosis Approach for the Launch of the Auto-Body Assembly Process
,” ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol. 116
, No. 4
, pp. 491
–499
.8.
Ceglarek, D., Shi, J., and Zhou, Z., 1993, “Variation Reduction for Body Assembly: Methodologies and Case Studies Analysis,” Final Report for the Jeep Grand Cherokee Dimensional “2 mm” Program for Chrysler Corp., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
9.
El-Gizawy
A. S.
Hwang
J.-Y.
Brewer
D. H.
1990
, “A Strategy for Integrating Product and Process Design of Aerospace Components
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 3
, No. 3
, pp. 178
–186
.10.
Gadh, R., 1993, “A Hybrid Approach to Intelligent Geometric Design Using Features-Based Design and Feature Recognition,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual ASME Design Automation Conference, DE-Vol. 65-2, pp. 273–283.
11.
Himbert, M., and Ceglarek, D., 1996, “Managing Dimensional Variation in Automotive Body Assembly by Design Analysis,” Technical Report, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
12.
Kramer, G. A., 1990, “Solving Geometric Constraint Systems,” Proceedings of the National Conference on AI, pp. 708–714, Boston.
13.
Lee, S., and Yi, C., 1995a, “Statistical Measure of Assemblability under the Propagation of Tolerance and Clearances,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, pp. 94–99, Pittsburgh, PA.
14.
Lee, S., and Yi, C., 1995b, “Evaluation of Assemblability Based on Statistical Analysis of Tolerance Propagation,” Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, v. 3, pp. 256–261.
15.
Liu, Y., and Poppestone, R. J., 1990, “Symmetry Constraint Inference in Assembly Planning,” Proceedings of the National Conference on Al, pp. 1038–1044, Boston.
16.
Medoff
S. M.
Register
M. S.
Swartwout
M. W.
1989
, “A Framework for Design Verification and Evaluation Systems
,” Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing
, Vol. 3
, No. 2
, pp. 71
–84
.17.
Miyakawa
S.
Ohashi
T.
Iwata
M.
1990
, “The Hitachi New Assemblability Evaluation Method (AEM)
,” Transactions of NAMRI
, Vol. 18
, pp. 352
–359
.18.
Parkinson
A.
Sorensen
C.
Pourhassan
N.
1993
, “A General Approach for Robust Optimal Design
,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design
, Vol. 115
, No. 1
, pp. 74
–80
.19.
Requicha
A. A. G.
1983
, “Toward a Theory of Geometric Tolerancing
,” The International Journal of Robotics Research
, Vol. 2
, No. 4
, pp. 45
–60
.20.
Serrano, D., 1987, “Constraint Management in Conceptual Design,” Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Boston.
21.
Shalon, D., Gossard, D., Ulrich, K., and Fitzpatrick, D., 1992, “Representing Geometric Variations in Complex Structural Assemblies on CAD Systems,” Proceedings of the 19th Annual ASME Advances in Design Automation Conference, DE-Vol. 44-2, pp. 121–132.
22.
Shi, J., Hu, S. J., and Ceglarek, D., 1994, “Process Navigator for the Automobile Body Assembly Process,” Proceedings of the First S. M. Wu Symposium on Manufacturing Science, Evanston IL, pp. 325–332.
23.
Siddall, J., 1983, Probabilistic Engineering Design: Principles and Applications, Marcel Dekker, New York.
24.
Taguchi, G., Elsayed, E., and Hsiang, T., 1989, Quality Engineering in Production Systems, McGraw-Hill.
25.
Thurston
D.
1991
, “A Formal Method for Subjective Design Evaluation, with Multiple Attributes
,” Research in Engineering Design
, Vol. 3
, pp. 105
–122
.26.
Turner, J. U., and Wozny, M. J., 1990, “The M-Space Theory of Tolerances,” ASME Proc. of Advances in Design Automation, 1990.
27.
Whitney
D. E.
1993
, “Integrated Design and Manufacturing
,” Manufacturing Review
, Vol. 6
, No. 4
, pp. 329
–342
.28.
Whitney, D. E., and Gilbert, O. L., 1993, “Representation of Geometric Variations Using Matrix Transforms for Statistical Tolerance Analysis in Assemblies,” Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 2, pp. 314–321.
29.
Wood
K. L.
Antonsson
E. K.
1989
, “Computations with Imprecise Parameters in Engineering Design: Background and Theory
,” ASME Journal of Mechanical Design
, Vol. 111
, pp. 616
–625
.30.
Yannoulakis, N. J., Joshi, S. B., and Wysk, R. A., 1991, “A Manufacturability Evaluation and Improvement System,” Proceedings of the 3rd International ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, DE-Vol. 31, pp. 217–226.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.
