In many instances machined parts experience sliding motion while in contact with a counter surface. The performance of the contacting parts depends on their friction and wear characteristics. In this work the effects of the machining condition on the tribological performance of steel, brass, and duralumin are investigated. For steel, it is shown that the friction coefficient value remains about the same whereas the rate of wear varies as the cutting condition is altered. The friction coefficients for brass and duralumin were lower than that of steel and their tribological properties seem to be less sensitive to the machining condition. In conclusion, it is emphasized that the machining condition directly influences the surface integrity which in turn affects the tribological performance of the machined parts, and therefore, the machining condition for parts that experience contact sliding motion should be optimized for best tribological performance in addition to dimensional accuracy and surface roughness.

1.
Archard
I. F.
,
1953
, “
Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Physics
, Vol.
24
, pp.
981
988
.
2.
Bowden, F. P., and Tabor, D., 1954, The Friction and Lubrication of Solids, Clarendon Press.
3.
Fleming
J. R.
, and
Suh
N. P.
,
1977
, “
Mechanics of Crack Propagation in Delamination Wear
,”
Wear
, Vol.
44
, pp.
39
56
.
4.
Jang
D.
,
Liou
J.
, and
Cho
U.
,
1994
, “
Study of Residual Stress Distribution in the Machined Stainless Steel Components
,”
Tribology Transactions
, Vol.
37
, No.
3
, pp.
594
600
.
5.
Jeelani
S.
, and
Musial
M.
,
1986
, “
Dependence of Fatigue Life on the Surface Integrity in the Machining of 2024-T351 Aluminum Alloy-Unlubricated Conditions
,”
Journal of Materials Science
, Vol.
21
, pp.
155
160
.
6.
Kim, D., and Hwang, D., 1995, “Surface Integrity and Tribological Properties of Machined Surfaces,” KSTLE 1th Korea-U.S. Tribology Symposium, Seoul, pp. 37–45.
7.
Kim
D. E.
, and
Suh
N. P.
,
1993
, “
Frictional Behavior of Extremely Smooth and Hard Solids
,”
Wear
, Vol.
164
, pp.
873
879
.
8.
Leskovar
P.
, and
Peklenik
J.
,
1982
, “
Influence Affecting Surface Integrity in the Cutting Process
,”
Annals of CIRP
, Vol.
31
, No.
1
, pp.
447
450
.
9.
Liu
C. R.
, and
Barash
M. M.
,
1976
a, “
The Mechanical State of the Sublayer of a Surface Generated by Chip-Removal Process, Part 1: Cutting with a Sharp Tool
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
98
, pp.
1192
1201
.
10.
Liu
C. R.
, and
Barash
M. M.
,
1976
b, “
The Mechanical State of the Sublayer of a Surface Generated by Chip-Removal Process, Part 2: Cutting with a Tool with Flank Wear
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
98
, pp.
1202
1208
.
11.
Liu
C. R.
, and
Barash
M. M.
,
1982
, “
Variables Governing Patterns of Mechanical Residual Stress in a Machined Surface
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR INDUSTRY
, Vol.
104
, pp.
257
264
.
12.
Rabinowicz, E., 1980, “Wear Coefficients-Metals,” Wear Control Handbook, ASME.
13.
Saka
N.
, and
Suh
N. P.
,
1987
, “
Surface Engineering
,”
Annals of the CIRP
, Vol.
36
, No.
1
, pp.
403
408
.
14.
Suh
N. P.
,
Sin
H.
,
Tohkai
M.
, and
Saka
N.
,
1980
, “
Surface Topography and Functional Requirements for Dry Sliding Surfaces
,”
Annals of CIRP
, Vol.
29
, No.
1
, pp.
413
418
.
15.
Suh, N. P., 1986, Tribophysics, Prentice-Hall.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.