A model for predicting the chip breakability potential of groove and obstruction-type tools is described. The potential for a tool to break chips is evaluated in terms of the chip geometry and the damage sustained by the chip as it is formed in the shear zone. The chip geometry is characterized by its thickness-to-radius ratio, and the material damage is evaluated in terms of a normalized accumulated damage factor that is based on a hole growth and coalescence model. The chip thickness-to-radius ratio and the normalized accumulated damage factor are evaluated using a finite element cutting model. A total of 210 cutting tests were conducted to verify the model. Different tools including flat, obstruction, and groove, were tested for cutting of AISI 1020 steel and SS 304 steel. Each of these tool geometries exhibited significantly different chip thickness-to-radius ratios and normalized accumulated damage. Threshold criteria for breaking chips were determined for AISI 1020 and SS 304. For difficult-to-break materials such as stainless, a lower normalized accumulated damage was needed and a higher chip thickness-to-radius ratio was required to break chips. Although the model presented in the paper was developed for orthogonal cutting, it can be readily extended to three dimensional machining processes. Using this approach, a new tool design can be evaluated for its chip breakability potential with much less reliance on prototype building and testing.

1.
Athavale, S. M., 1994, “A Damage-Based Model for Predicting Chip-Breakability for Obstruction and Groove Tools,” Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University.
2.
Dewhurst
P.
,
1979
, “
The Effect of Chip Breaker Constraints on Mechanics of Machining
,”
Annals of CIRP
,
28
, p.
1
5
.
3.
Jawahir
I. S.
,
1988
a, “
A Survey and Future Predictions for the Use of Chip Breaking in Unmanned Systems
,”
International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
, Vol.
3
, pp.
87
104
.
4.
Jawahir
I. S.
,
1988
b, “
The Chip Control Factor in Machinability Assessments: Recent Trends
,”
Journal of Mechanical Working Technology
, Vol.
17
, pp.
213
224
.
5.
Jawahir, I. S., and Oxley, P. L. B., 1988c, “Efficient Chip Control at Reduced Power Consumption: An Experimental Analysis,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering, Brisbane, Australia.
6.
Jawahir
I. S.
,
1988
d “
The Tool Restricted Contact Effect as a Major Influencing Factor in Chip Breaking: An Experimental Analysis
,”
Annals of CIRP
, Vol.
37
, p.
121
121
.
7.
Jawahir
I. S.
, and
van Luttervelt
C. A.
,
1993
Recent Developments in Chip Control Research and Development
,”
Annals of CIRP
, Vol.
42
, No.
2
, p.
659
659
.
8.
McClintock
F. A.
,
Kaplan
S. M.
, and
Berg
C. A.
,
1966
, “
Ductile Fracture by Hole Growth in Shear Bands
,”
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
, Vol.
2
, p.
614
614
.
9.
McClintock
F. A.
,
1968
, “
A Criterion for Ductile Fracture by the Growth of Holes
,”
ASME Journal of Applied Mechanics
, Vol.
35
, p.
363
363
.
10.
Nakayama
K.
,
1962
, “
A Study on Chipbreaker
,”
Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Mechanical Engineering
, Vol.
5
, No.
17
, pp.
142
150
.
11.
Nakayama
K.
,
1979
, “
Basic Rules on the Form of Chip in Metal Cutting
,”
Annals of CIRP
, Vol.
28
, p.
17
17
.
12.
Nakayama
K.
,
1981
, “
Cutting Tool with Curved Rake Face—A Means for Breaking Thin Chips
,”
Annals of CIRP
, Vol.
30
, pp.
5
8
.
13.
Nakayama
K.
,
1984
, “
Chip Control in Metal Cutting
,”
Bulletin of the Japan Society of Precision Engineering
, Vol.
18
, No.
2
, pp.
97
103
.
14.
Nakayama
K.
, and
Arai
M.
,
1992
, “
Comprehensive Chip Form Classification Based on the Cutting Mechanism
,”
Annals of the CIRP
, Vol.
41
, No.
1
, pp.
71
74
.
15.
Niebauer, K., 1993, Kennametal, Inc., Private Communication.
16.
Shih
T.
, and
Ramalingam
S.
,
1991
, “
Slip-Line Solution for Orthogonal Cutting with a Chip Breaker and Flank Wear
,”
International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
, Vol.
33
, No.
9
, p.
689
689
.
17.
Sowerby
R.
, and
Chandrasekaran
N.
,
1989
, “
A Proposal for the Onset of Chip Segmentation in Machining
,”
Materials Science and Engineering
,
A119
, p.
219
219
.
18.
Strenkowski, J. S., Athavale, S. M., and Yang, J. A., 1991, “Study of Chip Breaking Mechanisms in Orthogonal Cutting,” Technical Report Submitted to Los Alamos National Laboratory, Subcontract 9-XMO-F7372-1.
19.
Worthington
B.
, and
Redford
A. H.
,
1973
, “
Chip Curl and the Action of the Groove Type Chip Form
,”
International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research
, Vol.
13
, p.
257
257
.
20.
Worthington
B.
,
1974
, “
Surface Integrity, Cutting Forces And Chip Formation When Machining with Double Rake Angle Tools
,”
International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research
, Vol.
14
, p.
279
279
.
21.
Worthington
B.
,
1976
, “
The Effect of Rake Face Configuration on the Curvature of the Chip in Metal Cutting
,”
International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research
, Vol.
15
, p.
223
223
.
22.
Worthington
B.
, and
Rahman
M. H.
,
1979
, “
Predicting Breaking with Groove Type Breakers
,”
International Journal of Machine Tool Design and Research
, Vol.
19
, p.
121
121
.
23.
Yang, J. A., 1992, “A Predictive Model of Chip Breaking for Groove-Type Tools in Orthogonal Machining of AISI 1020 Steel,” Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University.
24.
Yang, J. A., Athavale, S. M., and Strenkowski, J. S., 1996, “A Finite Element Chip Breaking Model for Groove Tools,” Mathematical Modeling and Scientific Computing in Science and Technology, Vol. 6.
25.
Zhang, B., and Bagchi, A., 1994, “A Study of Chip Separation and its Approximation in Finite Element Simulation of Continuous Chip Formation,” Proc. of Winter Annual Meeting of the ASME, Material Issues in Machining II and Physics of Machining Processes II, D. A. Stephenson and R. Stevenson, eds., p. 157.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.