Abstract

Labyrinth seals (LSs), honeycomb seals (HCSs) and hole-pattern seals, pocket damper seals (PDSs), and fully-partitioned damper seals (FPDSs) serve as balance pistons on the discharge side of barrel-type centrifugal compressors. These seals, facing large pressure differentials along with significant changes in gas density, produce sizeable lateral forces that impact compressor stability and rotordynamic performance. There is extensive archival data on the dynamic forced performance of LS and textured surface seals. However, the experimental database for a FPDS is insufficient, thus a comprehensive comparison of their dynamic force performance against that of textured surface seals is missing. The paper presents experimentally derived rotordynamic force coefficients for a FPDS along with a direct comparison to published data for a HCS and a LS, both similar in size and in operating conditions. The dynamic load tests with the FPDS include operation at a shaft speed (Ω) of 10 krpm (rotor surface speed of 60 m/s) while supplied with air at Pin = 70 bar and Tin =10 °C, and a discharge at Pout = 0.25, 0.5, and 0.65 of Pin. The preswirl circumferential velocity at the seal inlet is low, approximately 6% of rotor surface speed. The FPDS having eight pockets × eight axial blades produces a direct stiffness (K) increasing with excitation frequency (ω), though K < 0 for the lowest pressure ratio PR = (Pout/Pin) = 0.25. The cross-coupled stiffness (k) is invariant to frequency whereas the direct damping (C) steadily decreases as ω/Ω → 1, and then increases for larger frequencies. Hence, the effective damping coefficient (Ceff = C − k/ω) is approximately constant for ω < Ω, while increasing for higher frequencies. For the three PRs, the FPDS leakage is roughly up to 26% larger than the HCS leakage, while the 20-blade LS leaks in between both. The comparison of results shows the LS has insignificant forces compared to those from the HCS and FPDS, both producing a comparable Ceff and similar crossover frequencies (Ceff > 0). The HCS produces a large direct stiffness (K), three to four times that of the FPDS. Comparison of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) predictions for the FPDS against the experimental force coefficients shows significant differences, in particular an overestimation of direct stiffness as the frequency grows along with a lower direct damping for frequencies equal and above the shaft speed. Besides manufacturing considerations, a FPDS is a better alternative to a HCS whose large centering stiffness (K) may affect the compressor's critical speed, hence shortening the separation margin with respect to the operating speed.

References

1.
Fowlie
,
D. W.
, and
Miles
,
D. D.
,
1975
, “
Vibration Problems With High Pressure Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME
Paper No. 75-PET-28. 10.1115/75-PET-28
2.
Geary
,
C. H.
,
Damratowski
,
L. P.
, and
Chet
,
H. S.
,
1976
, “
Highest Pressure Gas Injection Centrifugal Compressors
,”
Proceedings of the 8th Annual Offshore Technology Conf
,
Houston, TX
, May 2–4, pp.
3
6
.
3.
Kocur
,
J.
,
Cloud
,
C. H.
, and
Pettinato
,
B.
,
2018
, “
Predicting, Understanding and Avoiding the Ekofisk Rotor Instability Forty Years Later
,”
Proceedings of the 47th Turbomachinery and 34th Pump Symposia, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
,
Houston, TX
, Sept. 18–20, pp.
1
31
.https://dyrobes.com/wpcontent/uploads/2022/02/predicting_ekofisk_rotor_instability_40_years_later_linked.pdf
4.
Childs
,
D. W.
,
1993
,
Turbomachinery Rotordynamics: Phenomena, Modeling, and Analysis
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
5.
Von Pragenau
,
G. L.
,
1982
, “
Damping Seals for Turbomachinery
,”
NASA
,
Washington, DC
, Report No.
NASA-TP-1987
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19820012309
6.
Vance
,
J. M.
, and
Shultz
,
R. R.
,
1993
, “
A New Damper Seal for Turbomachinery
,”
Proceedings of the 14th Vibration and Noise Conference
,
Albuquerque, NM
, Sept. 19–22, pp.
139
148
.https://www.tib.eu/en/search/id/BLCP%3ACN000551491/A-New-Damper-Seal-for-Turbomachinery/
7.
Vannini
,
G.
,
Mazzali
,
C.
, and
Underbakke
,
H.
,
2016
, “
Rotordynamic Computational and Experimental Characterization of a Convergent Honeycomb Seal Tested With Negative Pre-Swirl, High Pressure With Static Eccentricity and Angular Misalignment
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2016-56615. 10.1115/GT2016-56615
8.
Vance
,
J. M.
,
Murphy
,
B.
, and
Zeidan
,
F.
,
2010
,
Machinery Vibration and Rotordynamics
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
9.
Vannarsdall
,
M. L.
,
2011
, “
Measured Results for a New Hole-Pattern Annular Gas Seal Incorporating Larger Diameter Holes, Comparisons to Results for a Traditional Hole-Pattern Seal and Predictions
,”
Master thesis
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.http://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2011-08-9759/VANNARSDALL-THESIS.pdf?sequence=2
10.
Li
,
J.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Vance
,
J.
,
1999
, “
A Bulk-Flow Analysis of Multiple-Pocket Gas Damper Seals
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
121
(
2
), pp.
355
363
.10.1115/1.2817128
11.
Li
,
J.
,
1995
, “
The Effect of a New Damper Seal on Rotordynamics
,” Master thesis,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.
12.
Li
,
J.
,
Kushner
,
F.
, and
DeChoudhury
,
P.
,
2000
, “
Gas Damper Seal Test Results, Theoretical Correlation, and Applications in Design of High-Pressure Compressors
,”
Proceedings of the 29th Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
,
Houston, TX
, Sept. 18–21, pp.
55
64
.10.21423/R1BH29
13.
Sprowl
,
T. B.
,
2003
, “
A Study of the Effects of Inlet Pre-swirl on the Dynamic Coefficients of a Straight-bore Honeycomb Gas Damper Seal
,”
Master thesis
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/1617
14.
Ertas
,
B. H.
,
2005
, “
Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Pocket Damper Seals
,”
Ph.D. dissertation
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/2592
15.
Ertas
,
B. H.
,
Gamal
,
A.
, and
Vance
,
J. M.
,
2006
, “
Rotordynamic Force Coefficients of Pocket Damper Seals
,”
ASME J. Turbomach.
,
128
(
4
), pp.
725
737
.10.1115/1.2221327
16.
Brown
,
P. D.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
,
2012
, “
Measurement Versus Predictions of Rotordynamic Coefficients of a Hole-Pattern Gas Seal With Negative Pre-Swirl
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
12
), p.
122503
.10.1115/1.4007331
17.
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Wade
,
J.
,
2004
, “
Rotordynamic-Coefficient and Leakage Characteristics for Hole-Pattern-Stator Annular Gas Seals–measurements Versus Predictions
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
126
(
2
), pp.
326
333
.10.1115/1.1611502
18.
Ertas
,
B. H.
,
Delgado
,
A.
, and
Vannini
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Rotordynamic Force Coefficients for Three Types of Annular Gas Seals With Inlet Pre-Swirl and High Differential Pressure Ratio
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
4
), p.
042503
.10.1115/1.4004537
19.
Li
,
J.
,
Li
,
Z.
, and
Feng
,
Z.
,
2012
, “
Investigations on the Rotordynamic Coefficients of Pocket Damper Seals Using the Multifrequency, One-Dimensional, Whirling Orbit Model and RANS Solutions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
10
), p.
102510
.10.1115/1.4007063
20.
Vannini
,
G.
,
Cioncolini
,
S.
,
Del Vescovo
,
G.
, and
Rovini
,
M.
,
2014
, “
Labyrinth Seal and Pocket Damper Seal High Pressure Rotordynamic Test Data
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
136
(
2
), p.
022501
.10.1115/1.4025360
21.
Li
,
Z.
,
Li
,
J.
, and
Feng
,
Z.
,
2015
, “
Numerical Investigations on the Leakage and Rotordynamic Characteristics of Pocket Damper Seals—Part I: Effects of Pressure Ratio, Rotational Speed, and Inlet Pre-Swirl
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
137
(
3
), p.
032503
.10.1115/1.4028373
22.
Vannini
,
G.
,
Bertoneri
,
M.
,
Nielsen
,
K. K.
,
Iudiciani
,
P.
, and
Stronach
,
R.
,
2015
, “
Experimental Results and Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of Labyrinth and Pocket Damper Seals for Wet Gas Compression
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
138
(
5
), p.
052501
.10.1115/1.4031530
23.
Delgado
,
A.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
,
Thiele
,
J.
,
Yang
,
J.
, and
Cangioli
,
F.
,
2020
, “
Rotordynamic Performance of a Fully-Partitioned Damper Seal: Experimental and Numerical Results
,”
Proceedings of the 49th Turbomachinery and 36th Pump Symposia Turbomachinery Laboratory, Texas A&M Engineering Experiment Station
,
Virtual
, Dec. 8–10, pp.
1
29
.
24.
Rouvas
,
C.
, and
Childs
,
D. W.
,
1993
, “
A Parameter Identification Method for the Rotordynamic Coefficients of a High Reynolds Number Hydrostatic Bearing
,”
ASME J. Vib. Acoust.
,
115
(
3
), pp.
264
270
.10.1115/1.2930343
25.
Zhang
,
M.
,
Childs
,
D. W.
,
Tran
,
D. L.
, and
Shrestha
,
H.
,
2020
, “
A Study on the Leakage and Rotordynamic Coefficients of a Long-Smooth Seal With Laminar-Two-Phase, Mainly-Oil Mixtures
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
142
(
1
), p.
011020
.10.1115/1.4044946
26.
ANSYS
,
2016
,
ANSYS Fluent User's Guide 17.2
,
ANSYS Inc
,
Canonsburg, PA
.
27.
Yang
,
J.
,
San Andrés
,
L.
, and
Lu
,
X.
,
2019
, “
Leakage and Dynamic Force Coefficients of a Pocket Damper Seal Operating Under a Wet Gas Condition: Tests Versus Predictions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
141
(
11
), p.
111001
.10.1115/1.4044307
28.
Picardo
,
A. M.
,
2003
, “
High Pressure Testing of See Through Labyrinth Seals
,”
Master thesis
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.https://hdl.handle.net/1969.1/ETD-TAMU-2003-THESIS-P53
29.
Childs
,
D. W.
, and
Kim
,
C.
,
1986
, “
Test Results for Round-Hole-Pattern Damper Seals: Optimum Configurations and Dimensions for Maximum Net Damping
,”
ASME J. Tribol.
,
108
(
4
), pp.
605
609
.10.1115/1.3261277
30.
Nielsen
,
K. K.
,
Jønck
,
K.
, and
Underbakke
,
H.
,
2012
, “
Hole-Pattern and Honeycomb Seal Rotordynamic Forces: Validation of CFD-Based Prediction Techniques
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
134
(
12
), p.
122505
.10.1115/1.4007344
31.
Childs
,
D. W.
,
2020
, personal communication, April.
You do not currently have access to this content.