Abstract

As centrifugal compressors are pushed to operate at higher pressures and higher power levels, destabilizing gas forces often increase the challenge of designing a stable rotordynamic system. While technical innovations like damper seals, swirl brakes, and damper bearings that help stabilize compressors are numerous, predicting the impact that these improvements will have on a specific system is somewhat of an art form. To this end, researchers are constantly improving the depth of knowledge on these features so that the impact of these improvements is well defined. In the current work, the authors experimentally measured the impact of different swirl brake/vane concepts on the flow characteristics of a centrifugal compressor shroud cavity. The eye seal configuration studied here is a tooth on rotor labyrinth eye seal. The different shroud swirl vane geometries considered consist of various castellated features, each having the intent to reduce swirl velocity in the shroud cavity prior to entering the seal. The purpose of the testing was to determine whether a significant reduction in swirl velocity entering or exiting the seal could be measured with the different antiswirl vane profiles over a conventional shroud cavity that was tested with the same setup. The metrics that determine the effectiveness of the swirl brake were based on upstream and downstream measurements of swirl velocity using pitot-probes at different depths in the shroud cavity, and measurements of seal exit angle and velocity using a traversing cobra-probe. The test data presented herein show definitively that the different swirl brake designs, including a slotted seal, a long vane, and a short vane, have a major impact on swirl velocities relative to the conventional shroud design. The most effective at reducing swirl entering/leaving the seal is the slotted seal, while the concepts employing shroud vanes were more effective at reducing swirl in the shroud cavity.

References

1.
Benckert
,
H.
, and
Wachter
,
J.
,
1980
, “
Flow Induced Spring Coefficients of Labyrinth Seals for Application in Rotor Dynamics
,”
Proceedings NASA Lewis Research Center Rotordynamics Instability Problems in High-Performance Turbomachinery
, College Station, TX, pp.
189
212
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19800021216
2.
Sivo
,
J. M.
,
Acosta
,
A. J.
,
Brennen
,
C. E.
, and
Caughey
,
T. K.
,
1995
, “
Influence of Swirl Brakes on the Rotordynamic Forces Generated by Discharge-To-Suction Leakage Flows in Centrifugal Pumps
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
117
(
1
), pp.
104
108
.10.1115/1.2816797
3.
Baumann
,
U.
,
1999
, “
Rotordynamic Stability Tests on High-Pressure Radial Compressors
,”
Proceedings of the 28th Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
, pp.
115
122
.10.21423/R1TD30
4.
Fozi
,
A. A.
,
1986
, “
An Examination of Gas Compressor Stability and Rotating Stall
,”
Proceedings of a Workshop on Rotordynamic Instability Problems in High Performance Turbomachinery, NASA CP2443
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
, pp.
445
459
.https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19870012768
5.
Moore
,
J.
,
Walker
,
S.
, and
Kuzdzal
,
M.
,
2002
, “
Rotordynamic Stability Measurement During Full-Load, Full-Pressure Testing of a 6000-Psi Reinjection Centrifugal Compressor
,”
Proceedings of the 31st Turbomachinery Symposium
, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.10.21423/R10D3J
6.
Childs
,
D. W.
,
1993
,
Turbomachinery Rotordynamics
,
Wiley
,
New York
.
7.
Moore
,
J. J.
, and
Palazzolo
,
A. B.
,
1999
, “
Rotordynamic Force Prediction of Whirling Centrifugal Impeller Shroud Passages Using Computational Fluid Dynamic Techniques
,”
ASME
Paper No. 99-GT-334.10.1115/99-GT-334
8.
Moore
,
J.
, and
Ransom
,
D.
,
2008
, “
Refinement of Physics Based Approach Used in the Prediction of Impeller Rotordynamic Forces for Centrifugal Compressors
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2008-51484.10.1115/GT2008-51484
9.
Nielsen
,
K. K.
,
Myllerup
,
C. M.
, and
Van den Braembussche
,
R. A.
,
1998
, “
Optimization of swirl brakes by Means of a 3D Navier-Stokes Solver
,”
ASME
Paper No. 98-GT-328.10.1115/98-GT-328
10.
Moore
,
J.
, and
Hill
,
D.
,
2000
, “
Design of Swirl Brake for High Pressure Centrifugal Compressors Using CFD Techniques
,”
International Symposium on Transport Phenomena and Dynamics of Rotating Machinery
,
Honolulu, Hawaii
, Mar. 26–30.
11.
Baldassarre
,
L.
,
Bernocchi
,
A.
,
Fontana
,
M.
,
Guglielmo
,
A.
, and
Masi
,
G.
,
2014
, “
Optimization of Swirl Brake Design and Assessment of Its Stabilizing Effect on Compressor Rotordynamic Performance
,”
Proceedings of the 43rd Turbomachinery Symposium, Turbomachinery Laboratory
,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.10.21423/R15P94
12.
Untaroiu
,
A.
,
Hayrapetian
,
V.
,
Untaroiu
,
C. D.
,
Wood
,
H. G.
,
Schiavello
,
B.
, and
McGuire
,
J.
,
2013
, “
On the Dynamic Properties of Pump Liquid Seals
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
135
(
5
), p. 051104–1.10.1115/1.4023653
13.
Pugachev
,
A. O.
, and
Deckner
,
M.
,
2012
, “
Experimental and Theoretical Rotordynamic Stiffness Coefficients for a Three-Stage Brush Seal
,”
MSSP
,
31
, pp.
143
154
.10.1016/j.ymssp.2012.03.015
14.
Venkataraman
,
B.
,
Moulton
,
D.
,
Cave
,
M.
,
Clarke
,
C.
,
Wilkes
,
J.
,
Moore
,
J.
, and
Eldridge
,
T.
,
2018
, “
Design and Implementation of Swirl Brakes for Enhanced Rotordynamic Stability in an Off-Shore Centrifugal Compressor
,”
Proceedings of Asia Turbomachinery Symposium
,
Suntec, Singapore
, March 12–15.https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/187125918.pdf
15.
ASME
,
1997
, “
Performance Test Code on Compressors and Exhausters
,” PTC 10.
16.
ASME
,
2004
, “
Flow Measurement: Performance Test Codes
,” PTC 19.5.
17.
Moreland
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Influence of Pre-Swirl and Eccentricity in Smooth Stator/Grooved Rotor Liquid Annular Seals, Static and Rotordynamic Characteristics
,” M.S. thesis,
Texas A&M University
,
College Station, TX
.
18.
Scharrer
,
J.
, and
Pelletti
,
J.
,
1995
, “
Leakage and Rotordynamic Effects of Compressible Annular Seals
,”
Proceedings of 24th Turbomachinery Symposium
,
Houston, TX
, Sept. 25–28, pp.
175
190
.https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/1969.1/163477/T24175-190.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
19.
Lemmon
,
E. W.
,
Huber
,
M. L.
, and
McLinden
,
M. O.
,
2010
, “
NIST Reference Fluid Thermodynamic and Transport Properties—REFPROP v9.0
,” User's Guide, NIST Standard Reference Database 23.
20.
ASME
,
2011
, “
Measurement of Gas Flow by Bellmouth Inlet Flowmeters
,” ASME, New York, MFC-26.https://www.asme.org/codes-standards/find-codesstandards/mfc-26-measurement-gas-flow-bellmouth-inlet-flowmeters/2011/drm-enabled-pdf
You do not currently have access to this content.