The subject of this paper is a statistical method for the evaluation of the uncertainties for pneumatic multihole probe measurements. The method can be applied to different types of evaluation algorithms and is suitable for steady flow-field measurements in compressible flows. The evaluation of uncertainties is performed by a Monte Carlo method (MCM). Each calibration and measurement input quantity are randomly varied on the basis of its corresponding probability density function (PDF) and propagated through the deterministic parameter evaluation algorithm. Other than linear Taylor series based uncertainty evaluation methods, the MCM features several advantages: it does not suffer from lower-order expansion errors and can therefore reproduce nonlinearity effects. Furthermore, different types of PDFs can be assumed for the input quantities, and the corresponding coverage intervals can be calculated for any coverage probability. To demonstrate the uncertainty evaluation, a calibration and subsequent measurements in the wake of an airfoil with a five-hole probe are performed. The MCM is applied to different parameter evaluation algorithms. It is found that the MCM cannot be applied to polynomial curve fits, if the differences between the calibration data and the polynomial curve fits are of the same order of magnitude compared to the calibration uncertainty. Since this method has not yet been used for the evaluation of measurement uncertainties for pneumatic multihole probes, the aim of this paper is to present a highly accurate and easy-to-implement uncertainty evaluation method.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
July 2017
Research-Article
Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainties for Pneumatic Multihole Probes Using a Monte Carlo Method
Magnus Hölle,
Magnus Hölle
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: hoelle@ist.rwth-aachen.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: hoelle@ist.rwth-aachen.de
Search for other works by this author on:
Christian Bartsch,
Christian Bartsch
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: christian.bartsch@lhind.dlh.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: christian.bartsch@lhind.dlh.de
Search for other works by this author on:
Peter Jeschke
Peter Jeschke
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jeschke@ist.rwth-aachen.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jeschke@ist.rwth-aachen.de
Search for other works by this author on:
Magnus Hölle
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: hoelle@ist.rwth-aachen.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: hoelle@ist.rwth-aachen.de
Christian Bartsch
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: christian.bartsch@lhind.dlh.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: christian.bartsch@lhind.dlh.de
Peter Jeschke
Institute of Jet Propulsion and Turbomachinery,
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jeschke@ist.rwth-aachen.de
RWTH Aachen University,
Templergraben 55,
Aachen 52062, Germany
e-mail: jeschke@ist.rwth-aachen.de
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Turbomachinery Committee of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER. Manuscript received August 8, 2016; final manuscript received December 13, 2016; published online March 7, 2017. Editor: David Wisler.
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. Jul 2017, 139(7): 072605 (8 pages)
Published Online: March 7, 2017
Article history
Received:
August 8, 2016
Revised:
December 13, 2016
Citation
Hölle, M., Bartsch, C., and Jeschke, P. (March 7, 2017). "Evaluation of Measurement Uncertainties for Pneumatic Multihole Probes Using a Monte Carlo Method." ASME. J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. July 2017; 139(7): 072605. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035626
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Temperature Dependence of Aerated Turbine Lubricating Oil Degradation from a Lab-Scale Test Rig
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Multi-Disciplinary Surrogate-Based Optimization of a Compressor Rotor Blade Considering Ice Impact
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Experimental Investigations on Carbon Segmented Seals With Smooth and Pocketed Pads
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
Related Articles
A Comparison of Data-Reduction Methods for a Seven-Hole Probe
J. Fluids Eng (June,2002)
Assessment of Unsteady Pressure Measurement Uncertainty—Part I: Single Sensor Probe
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power (April,2016)
Uncertainty Evaluation on Multi-Hole Aerodynamic Pressure Probes
J. Turbomach (September,2021)
The Compressible Calibration of Miniature Multi-Hole Probes
J. Fluids Eng (March,2001)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
Comparing Probabilistic Graphical Model Based and Gaussian Process Based Selections for Predicting the Temporal Observations
Intelligent Engineering Systems through Artificial Neural Networks, Volume 20
IEL: A New Localization Algorithm for Wireless Sensor Network
International Conference on Instrumentation, Measurement, Circuits and Systems (ICIMCS 2011)
Development of Nuclear Boiler and Pressure Vessels in Taiwan
Companion Guide to the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Volume 3, Third Edition