The U.S. renewable fuel standard has made it a requirement to increase the production of ethanol and advanced biofuels to 36 billion by 2022. Ethanol will be capped at 15 billion, which leaves 21 billion to come from other sources such as butanol. Butanol has a higher energy density and lower affinity for water than ethanol. Moreover, alcohol fueled engines in general have been shown to positively affect engine-out emissions of oxides of nitrogen and carbon monoxide compared with their gasoline fueled counterparts. In light of these developments, the variety and blend levels of oxygenated constituents is likely to increase in the foreseeable future. The effect on engine-out emissions for total hydrocarbons is less clear due to the relative insensitivity of the flame ionization detector (FID) toward alcohols and aldehydes. It is well documented that hydrocarbon (HC) measurement using a conventional FID in the presence of oxygenates in the engine exhaust stream can lead to a misinterpretation of HC emissions trends for alcohol fuel blends. Characterization of the exhaust stream for all expected hydrocarbon constituents is required to accurately determine the actual concentration of unburned fuel components in the exhaust. In addition to a conventional exhaust emissions bench, this characterization requires supplementary instrumentation capable of hydrocarbon speciation and response factor independent quantification. Although required for certification testing, this sort of instrumentation is not yet widely available in engine development facilities. Therefore, an attempt is made to empirically determine FID correction factors for oxygenate fuels. Exhaust emissions of an engine fueled with several blends of gasoline and ethanol, n-butanol and iso-Butanol were characterized using both a conventional FID and a Fourier transform infrared. Based on these results, a response factor predicting the actual hydrocarbon emissions based solely on FID results as a function of alcohol type and content is presented. Finally, the correlation derived from data presented in this study is compared with equations and results found in the literature.

1.
Carns
,
M.
, and
Shlesinger
,
J.
, 2008, “
More Flight—Less Fuel
,” Report of the Defense Science Board Task Force on DOD Energy Strategy.
2.
Green Car Congress
, 2007, “
Leaders of Senate Energy Committee Introduce Biofuels Bill: 36 Billion Gallons by 2022
,” http://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/03/leaders_of_sena.htmlhttp://www.greencarcongress.com/2007/03/leaders_of_sena.html
3.
Ramey
,
D.
, and
Yang
,
S. T.
, 1984, “
Production of Butyric Acid and Butanol From Biomass
,” U.S. Department of Energy Paper No. 843183.
4.
Environmental Protection Agency
, Code of Federal Regulations Part 1065—Engine Testing Procedures.
5.
Kar
,
K.
, and
Chengm
,
W.
, 2009, “
Speciated Engine-Out Organic Emissions From PFI-SI Engine Operating on Ethanol/Gasoline Mixtures
,” SAE Paper No. 2009-01-2673.
6.
Hara
,
T.
, and
Tonoue
,
K.
, 2006, “
Laminar Flame Speed of Ethanol, N-Heptane, Iso-Octane Air Mixtures
,” JSAE Paper No. 20068518.
7.
Sinor
,
J. E.
, 1993, “
Current and Potential Future Performance of Ethanol Fuels
,” SAE Paper No. 930376.
8.
Marriott
,
C. D.
,
Wiles
,
M. A.
,
Gwidt
,
J. M.
, and
Parrish
,
S. E.
, 2008, “
Development of a Naturally Aspirated Spark Ignition Direct-Injection Flex-Fuel Engine
,” SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0319.
9.
Eichlseder
,
H.
,
Pischinger
,
R.
,
Wallner
,
T.
,
Wimmer
,
A.
,
Pirker
,
G.
, and
Ringler
,
J.
, 2002, “
Thermodynamic Examination of SI-Engine Combustion Concepts and Fuels as well as Their Potential
,”
Future Development Trends for Spark Ignition Engines Symposium
.
10.
Schubert
,
A.
, 2010, “
Expanding the Role of Biofuels Through Development of Advanced BioButanol
,”
Sustainable Biofuels Workshop at the SAE International Fuels and Lubricants Meeting
, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
11.
Wallner
,
T.
, and
Miers
,
S.
, 2008, “
Combustion Behavior of Gasoline and Gasoline/Ethanol Blends in a Modern Direct-Injection 4-Cylinder Engine
,” SAE Paper No. 2008-01-0077.
12.
Wallner
,
T.
, and
Frazee
,
R.
, 2010, “
Study of Regulated and Non-Regulated Emissions From Combustion of Gasoline, Alcohol Fuels and Their Blends in a DI-SI Engine
,” SAE Paper No. 2010-01-1571.
13.
Voss
,
E.
,
Schnitterger
,
W.
,
Königstein
,
A.
,
Scholten
,
I.
,
Pöpperl
,
M.
,
Pritze
,
S.
,
Rothenberger
,
P.
, and
Samstag
,
M.
, 2003, “
2.2 l Ecotec Direct—The New All-Aluminum Engine With Gasoline Direct Injection for the Opel Signum
,”
24th International Vienna Engine Symposium
.
14.
Horiba, Ltd.
, 2004, THC Analyzer FIA-725A, Code: I10000815000B Ver. 2.
15.
Jorgensen
,
A. D.
,
Picel
,
K. C.
, and
Stamoudis
,
V. C.
, 1990, “
Prediction of Gas Chromatography Flame Ionization Detector Response Factors From Molecular Structures
,”
Anal. Chem.
0003-2700,
62
(
7
), pp.
683
689
.
16.
California Environmental Protection Agency
, 2002, “
California Non-Methane Organic Gas Test Procedure
,” Air Resource Board.
17.
Suitability of HFR500 for Ethanol Measurements
,” Cambustion Application Note No. HFR06.
18.
Thermo Environmental Instruments Inc.
, 2000, “
Toxic Vapor Analyzer TVA-1000 Response Factors
,” Part No. 50039.
19.
Black
,
F. M.
,
High
,
L. E.
, and
Sigsby
,
J. E.
, 1975, “
The Application of Total Hydrocarbon Flame Detectors to the Analysis of Hydrocarbon Mixtures From Motor Vehicles, With and Without Catalytic Emissions Control
,”
Water, Air, Soil Pollut.
0049-6979,
5
, pp.
53
62
.
20.
Yanju
,
W.
,
Shenghua
,
L.
,
Hongsong
,
L.
,
Rui
,
Y.
,
Jie
,
L.
, and
Ying
,
W.
, 2008, “
Effects of Methanol/Gasoline Blends on a Spark Ignition Engine Performance and Emissions
,”
Energy Fuels
0887-0624,
22
, pp.
1254
1259
.
You do not currently have access to this content.