A computational technique for multistage steam turbines, which can allow for thermodynamic properties of steam, is presented. Conventional three-dimensional multistage calculations for unsteady flows have two main problems. One is the long computation time and the other is how to include the thermodynamic properties of steam. Ideal gas is assumed in most computational techniques for compressible flows. To shorten the computational time, a quasi-three-dimensional flow calculation technique is developed. In the analysis, conservation laws for compressible fluid in axisymmetric cylindrical coordinates are solved using a finite volume method based on an approximate Riemann solver. Blade forces are calculated from the camber and lean angles of blades with momentum equations. The axisymmetric assumption and the blade force model enable the effective calculation for multistage flows, even when the flow is strongly unsteady under off-design conditions. To take into account steam properties including effects of the gas-liquid phase change and two-phase flow, a flux-splitting procedure of compressible flow is generalized for real fluid. Density and internal energy per unit volume are selected as independent thermodynamic variables. Pressure and temperature in a superheated region or wetness mass fraction in a wet region are calculated by using a steam table. To improve computational efficiency, a discretized steam table matrix is made in which the density and specific internal energy are independent variables. For accuracy and continuity of steam properties, the second order Taylor expansion and linear interpolation are introduced. The computed results of the last four-stage low-pressure steam turbine at low load conditions show that there is a reverse flow near the hub region of the last stage bucket and the flow concentrates in the tip region due to the centrifugal force. At a very low load condition, the reverse flow region extends to the former stages and the unsteadiness of flow gets larger due to many vortices. Four-stage low-pressure steam turbine tests are also carried out at low load. The radial distributions of flow direction downstream from each stage are measured by traversing pneumatic probes. Additionally, pressure transducers are installed in the side wall to measure unsteady pressure. The regions of reverse flow are compared between computations and experiments at different load conditions, and their agreement is good. Further, the computation can follow the trends of standard deviation of unsteady pressure on the wall to volumetric flow rate of experiments.

1.
Bergmann
,
D.
,
Gloger
,
M.
,
May
,
G.
, and
Gartner
,
G.
, 1985, “
High Temperature Control in High Backpressure LP Turbines
,”
Proceedings of the American Power Conference
, pp.
219
229
.
2.
Gloger
,
M.
,
Neumann
,
K.
, and
Termuehlen
,
H.
, 1986, “
Design Criteria for Reliable Low-Pressure Blading
,”
ASME
Paper No. 86-JPGC-Pwr-42.
3.
Ham
,
A. J.
, and
Gloger
,
M.
, 1990, “
High Back-Pressure Turbine Experience in 4000 MW Kendal Power Station
,” ASME PWR, Vol.
10
, pp.
219
227
.
4.
Bennet
,
A.
, 1990, “
Investigation of Buffeting Stresses on Last Stage Blades
,”
Conference Steam Plant for the 1990’s
, IMechE Paper No. C386/005, pp.
179
191
.
5.
Schmidt
,
D.
, and
Riess
,
W.
, 1999, “
Steady and Unsteady Flow Measurements in the Last Stages of LP Steam Turbines
,”
IMechE 1999
, Paper No. C557/023/99, pp.
723
734
.
6.
Truckenmueller
,
F.
,
Gerschuetz
,
W.
,
Stetter
,
H.
, and
Hosenfeld
,
H. -G.
, 1999, “
Examination of the Dynamic Stress in the Moving Blades of the Last Stage in a Low-Pressure Model Turbine During Windage
,”
IMechE 1999
, Paper No. C557/024/99, pp.
757
768
.
7.
Liu
,
B.
,
Chen
,
S.
, and
Martin
,
H. F.
, 2000, “
A Primary Variable Throughflow Code and Its Application to Last Stage Reverse Flow in LP Steam Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. IJPGC2000-15010.
8.
Herzog
,
N.
,
Binner
,
M.
,
Seume
,
J. R.
, and
Rothe
,
K.
, 2007, “
Verification of Low-Flow Conditions in a Multi-Stage Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-27328.
9.
Senoo
,
S.
, and
Shikano
,
Y.
, 2002, “
Non-Equilibrium Homogeneously Condensing Flow Analyses as Design Tools for Steam Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. FEDSM2002-31191.
10.
Senoo
,
S.
, and
White
,
A. J.
, 2006, “
Numerical Simulations of Unsteady Wet Steam Flows With Non-Equilibrium Condensation in the Nozzles and the Steam Turbine
,”
ASME
Paper No. FEDSM-2006-98202.
11.
Chakravarthy
,
S. R.
, and
Osher
,
S.
, 1985, “
A New Class of High Accuracy TVD Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws
,” AIAA Paper No. 85-0363.
12.
Roe
,
P. L.
, 1986, “
Characteristic-Based Schemes for the Euler Equations
,”
Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.
0066-4189,
18
, pp.
337
365
.
13.
Pulliam
,
T. H.
, and
Chaussee
,
D. S.
, 1981, “
A Diagonal Form of an Implicit Approximate-Factorization Algorithm
,”
J. Comput. Phys.
0021-9991,
39
, pp.
347
363
.
14.
Kulite product brochure for the pressure transducer List of table captions.
You do not currently have access to this content.