The mixing of fuel and air in combustion systems plays a key role in overall operability and emissions performance. Such systems are also being looked to for operation on a wide array of potential fuel types, including those derived from renewable sources such as biomass or agricultural waste. The optimization of premixers for such systems is greatly enhanced if efficient design tools can be utilized. The increased capability of computational systems has allowed tools such as computational fluid dynamics to be regularly used for such purpose. However, to be applied with confidence, validation is required. In the present work, a systematic evaluation of fuel mixing in a specific geometry, which entails cross flow fuel injection into axial nonswirling air streams has been carried out for methane and hydrogen. Fuel concentration is measured at different planes downstream of the point of injection. In parallel, different computational fluid dynamics approaches are used to predict the concentration fields resulting from the mixing of fuel and air. Different steady turbulence models including variants of Reynolds averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) have been applied. In addition, unsteady RANS and large eddy simulation are used. To accomplish mass transport with any of the RANS approaches, the concept of the turbulent Schmidt number is generally used. As a result, the sensitivity of the RANS simulations to different turbulent Schmidt number values is also examined. In general, the results show that the Reynolds stress model, with use of an appropriate turbulent Schmidt number for the fuel used, provides the best agreement with the measured values of the variation in fuel distribution over a given plane in a relatively time efficient manner. It is also found that, for a fixed momentum flux ratio, both hydrogen and methane penetrate and disperse in a similar manner for the flow field studied despite their significant differences in density and diffusivity.

1.
Wegner
,
B.
,
Huai
,
Y.
, and
Sadiki
,
A.
, 2004, “
Comparative Study of Turbulent Mixing in Jet in Cross-Flow Configurations Using LES
,”
Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow
0142-727X,
25
, pp.
767
775
.
2.
King
,
P. T.
,
Andrews
,
G. E.
,
Kim
,
M. N.
,
Pourkashanian
,
M.
, and
McIntosh
,
A. C.
, 2009, “
CFD Prediction and Design of Low NOx Radial Swirler Systems
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-60107.
3.
Burattini
,
P.
,
Talamelli
,
A.
, and
Tanzini
,
G.
, 2004, “
Experimental Analysis of the Flowfield at the Exit of a Premixer for Combustion Applications
,”
Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci.
0894-1777,
28
, pp.
781
789
.
4.
Andreopoulos
,
J.
, and
Rodi
,
W.
, 1984, “
Experimental Investigation of Jets in a Crossflow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
138
, pp.
93
127
.
5.
He
,
G.
,
Guo
,
Y.
, and
Hsu
,
A. T.
, 1999, “
The Effect of Schmidt Number on Turbulent Scalar Mixing in a Jet-in-Crossflow
,”
Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer
0017-9310,
42
, pp.
3727
3738
.
6.
Keffer
,
J. F.
, and
Baines
,
W. D.
, 1963, “
The Round Turbulent Jet in a Cross-Wind
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
15
, pp.
481
496
.
7.
Broadwell
,
J. E.
, and
Breidenthal
,
R. E.
, 1984, “
Structure and Mixing of a Transverse Jet in Incompressible Flow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
148
, pp.
405
412
.
8.
Smith
,
S. H.
, and
Mungal
,
M. G.
, 1998, “
Mixing, Structure and Scaling of the Jet in Crossflow
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
357
, pp.
83
122
.
9.
Fric
,
T.
, and
Roshko
,
A.
, 1994, “
Vortical Structure in the Wake of a Transverse Jet
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
279
, pp.
1
47
.
10.
Ivanova
,
E.
,
Di Domenico
,
M.
,
Noll
,
B.
, and
Aigner
,
M.
, 2009, “
Unsteady Simulations of Flow Field and Scalar Mixing in Transverse Jets
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2009-59147.
11.
Yeung
,
P. K.
,
Xu
,
S.
, and
Sreenivasan
,
K. R.
, 2002, “
Schmidt Number Effects on Turbulent Transport With Uniform Mean Scalar Gradient
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
14
, pp.
4178
4191
.
12.
Tominaga
,
Y.
, and
Stathopoulos
,
T.
, 2007, “
Turbulent Schmidt Numbers for CFD Analysis With Various Types of Flowfield
,”
Atmos. Environ.
1352-2310,
41
, pp.
8091
8099
.
13.
Dillon
,
A. C.
, and
Heben
,
M. J.
, 2001, “
Hydrogen Storage Using Carbon Adsorbents: Past, Present and Future
,”
Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process.
0947-8396,
72
, pp.
133
142
.
14.
Sierens
,
R.
, and
Rosseel
,
E.
, 2000, “
Variable Composition Hydrogen/Natural Gas Mixtures for Increased Engine Efficiency and Decreased Emissions
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
122
, pp.
135
140
.
15.
Dennis
,
R. A.
, and
Harp
,
R.
, 2007, “
Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Fossil Energy Advanced Turbine Program for Coal Based Power Systems With Carbon Capture
,”
ASME
Paper No. GT2007-28338.
16.
Therkelsen
,
P. L.
,
Werts
,
T. J.
,
McDonell
,
V. G.
, and
Samuelsen
,
G. S.
, 2008, “
Analysis of NOx Formation in a Hydrogen Fuel Gas Turbine Engine
,” ASME Paper No. GT2008-50841.
17.
Lieuwen
,
T.
,
McDonell
,
V.
,
Petersen
,
E.
, and
Santavicca
,
D.
, 2008, “
Fuel Flexibility Influences on Premixed Combustor Blowout, Flashback, Autoignition, and Stability
,”
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
0742-4795,
130
, p.
011506
.
18.
Bardina
,
J. E.
,
Huang
,
P. G.
, and
Coakley
,
T. J.
, 1997, “
Turbulence Modeling Validation, Testing, and Development
,”
NASA
Report No. TM 110446.
19.
Xiao
,
Y.
, and
Tang
,
H. W.
, 2006, “
Numerical Simulation of a Horizontal Momentum Jet in Cross-Flow
,”
J. Hydrodynam.
1001-6058,
18
, pp.
118
125
.
20.
FLUENT 6.3, documentation.
21.
McWilliam
,
I. G.
, and
Dewar
,
R. A.
, 1958, “
Flame Ionization Detector for Gas Chromatography
,”
J. Nature (London)
,
181
, pp.
760
762
.
22.
McWilliam
,
I. G.
, 1983, “
The Origin of the Flame Ionization Detector
,”
J. Chromatographia
,
17
, pp.
241
243
.
23.
Holdeman
,
J. D.
,
Smith
,
T. D.
,
Clisset
,
J. R.
, and
Lear
,
W. E.
, 2005, “
A Spreadsheet for the Mixing of a Row of Jets With a Confined Crossflow
,”
NASA
Report No. TM-2005-213137.
You do not currently have access to this content.