The relatively innovative gas turbine based power cycles R-ATR and R-REF (recuperative–auto thermal reforming GT cycle and recuperative–reforming GT cycle) here proposed, are mainly aimed to allow the upstream CO2 removal by the natural gas fuel reforming. The second part of the paper is dedicated to the R-REF cycle: the power unit is a gas turbine (GT), fuelled with reformed and CO2 cleaned gas, obtained by the addition of several sections to the simple GT cycle, mainly: • reformer section (REF), where the reforming reactions of methane fuel with steam are accomplished: the necessary heat is supplied partially by the exhausts cooling and, partially, with a post-combustion, • water gas shift reactor (WGSR), where the reformed fuel is, shifted into CO2 and H2 with the addition of water, and • CO2 removal unit for the CO2 capture from the reformed and shifted fuel. No water condensing section is adopted for the R-REF configuration. Between the main components, several heat recovery units are applied, together with GT cycle recuperator, compressor intercooler, and steam injection into the combustion chamber. The CO2 removal potential is close to 90% with chemical absorption by an accurate choice of amine solution blend: the heat demand for amine regeneration is completely self-sustained by the power cycle. The possibility of applying steam blade cooling (the steam is externally added) has been investigated: in these conditions, the R-REF has shown efficiency levels close to 43–44%. High values of specific work have been observed as well (around 450–500 kJ/kg). The efficiency is slightly lower than that found for the R-ATR solution, and 2–3% lower than CRGTs with CO2 removal and steam bottoming cycle, not internally recuperated. If compared with these, the R-REF offers higher simplicity due to absence of the steam cycle, and can be regarded as an improvement to the simple GT. In this way, at least 5–6 points efficiency can be gained, together with high levels of CO2 removal. The effects of the reformed fuel gas composition, temperature, and pressure on the amine absorption system for the CO2 removal have been investigated, showing the beneficial effects of increasing pressure (i.e., pressure ratio) on the specific heat demand.

1.
Corti, A., Failli, L., Fiaschi, D., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Exergy Analysis of Two Second-Generation SCGT Plant Proposals,” Proceedings of ASME IGTI 43rd Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden.
2.
Corti, A., Lombardi, L., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Absorption of CO2 With Amines in a Semi-Closed GT Cycle: Plant Performance and Operating Costs,” Proceedings of ASME IGTI 43rd Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exhibition, Stockholm, Sweden.
3.
Corti, A., and Manfrida, G., 1998, “Economic Analysis of a Semi-Closed Gas Turbine/Combined Cycle (SCGT/CC) With CO2 Removal by Amines Absorption,” GHGT-4, “4th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Tecnologies,” InterLaken, Switzerland, Aug. 30–Sept. 2.
4.
Corti
,
A.
,
Fiaschi
,
D.
, and
Manfrida
,
G.
,
1999
, “
Thermo-Economic Evaluation of the SCGT Cycle
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
40
, pp.
1917
1929
.
5.
Facchini, B., Fiaschi, D., and Manfrida, G., 1996, “Semi-Closed Gas Turbine/Combined Cycle With Water Recovery,” Proceedings of 1996 ASME IGTI Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibition, Birmingham, Paper No. 96-GT-317.
6.
Facchini
,
B.
,
Fiaschi
,
D.
, and
Manfrida
,
G.
,
1997
, “
SCGT/CC: An Innovative Cycle With Advanced Environmental and Peakload Shaving Features
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
38
(
15–17
), pp.
1647
1653
.
7.
Fiaschi
,
D.
, and
Manfrida
,
G.
,
1999
, “
A New Semi-Closed Gas Turbine Cycle With CO2 Separation
,”
Energy Convers. Manage.
,
40
, pp.
1669
1678
.
8.
Mathieu, Ph., Dechamps, P., and Distelmans, M., 1994, “Concepts and Applications of CO2 Gas Turbines,” Power-Gen Europe ’94, Cologne.
9.
Mathieu, Ph., Chefneux, E., and Dechamps, P., 1995, “Energy and Exergy Analysis of CO2 Based Combined Cycle Plants,” Second Law Analysis of Energy Systems: Towards the 21st Century, Roma.
10.
Lozza, G., and Chiesa, P., 2000, “Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles. Part A: Partial Oxidation,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0163.
11.
Lozza, G., and Chiesa, P., 2000, “Natural Gas Decarbonization to Reduce CO2 Emission From Combined Cycles. Part B: Steam-Methane Reforming,” ASME Paper 2000-GT-0164.
12.
Andersen, T., Kvamsdal, M., and Bolland, O., 2000, “Gas Turbine Combined Cycle With CO2-Capture Using Auto-Thermal Reforming of Natural Gas,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, May 8–11, Munich, Germany.
13.
Cau G., and Cocco D., 2000, “Performance Assessment of Semi-Closed Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine Systems,” Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo, May 8–11, Munich, Germany.
14.
Carcasci, C., and Harvey, S., 1998, “Design Issues for the Methane-Steam Reformer of a Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine Cycle,” ASME IGTI International Gas Turbine Congress, Stockholm.
15.
Tapinassi, L., 2001, “Studio di impianti di potenza innovativi con turbina a gas integrati con sistemi di rimozione della CO2 tramite conversione del metano in combustibile ad alto contenuto di idrogeno,” Graduation thesis (in Italian) in Environmental Engineering–Universita` degli Studi di Firenze, Italy.
16.
Fiaschi, D., Lombardi, L., and Tapinassi, L., 2002, “The R-ATR and the R-REF Gas Turbine Power Cycles With CO2 Removal, Part 1: The R-ATR Cycle,” Proceedings of 2002 ASME IGTI Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, Paper No. GT-2002-30116.
17.
Adelman
,
S. T.
,
Hoffman
,
M. A.
, and
Baughn
,
J. W.
,
1995
, “
A Methane-Steam Reformer for a Basic Chemically Recuperated Gas Turbine
,”
ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power
,
117
, pp.
16
23
.
18.
Carcasci
,
C.
,
Facchini
,
B.
, and
Harvey
,
S.
,
1998
, “
Design Issues and Performance of a Chemically Recuperated Aeroderivative Gas Turbine
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng.
,
212
,
A
A
.
19.
Lombardi, L., 2000, “LCA Comparison of Technical Solutions for CO2 Emissions Reduction in Power Generation,” Ph.D. thesis, Dipartimento di Energetica “Sergio Stecco”–Universita` degli Studi di Firenze, Italy.
20.
Lai, G. Y., 1990, High Temperature Corrosion of Engineering Alloys, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, pp. 47–72.
21.
Holland
,
M. L.
, and
De Bruyn
,
H. J.
,
1996
, “
Metal Dusting Failures in Methane Reforming Plant
,”
Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping
,
66
, pp.
125
133
.
22.
Holland, M. L., 2000, “Practical Experience With Countering Metal Dusting in a Methane Reforming Unit,” Mossgas (PTY) Ltd., Mossel Bay, South Africa, on http://www.mossgas.com/research/nace2000a.pdf.
You do not currently have access to this content.