Inconel 718 alloy is used extensively in aerogas turbines and this alloy is most difficult to machine and highly prone to dimensional instability after machining. Such detrimental phenomenon poses an enormous problem in engine assembly and affects structural integrity. This paper highlights the systematic research work undertaken to study the plastic deformation characteristics of Inconel 718, and the effect of process variables on machined surface, subsurface, and dimensional instability. Also illustrated is the technique developed for simultaneous optimization of several process variables such as cutting speed, feed, depth of cut, rake angle, and tool nose radius to control the residual stresses and dimensional instability within the acceptable tolerance band of the component. Prediction equations were developed for residual stress, dimensional instability, tool life, surface finish, and material removal rate. Predicted data were validated experimentally. This paper also presents the qualitative and quantitative data on dimensional instability with specific case studies of jet engine components, and it clearly illustrates the approach followed to develop a technique to control such detrimental effect. [S0742-4795(00)00901-7]

1.
Marshall, C. W., and Maringer, R. E., 1977, “Dimensional Instability—An Introduction,” International series of Material Sci. & Tech., Vol. 22, Pergamon Press, New York.
2.
Israeli
,
A.
, and
Bendeck
,
1983
,
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
105
, pp.
133
135
.
3.
Komanduri
,
R.
, and
Schroeder
,
T. A.
,
1986
,
ASME J. Eng. Ind.
,
108
, No.
2
, pp.
93
100
.
4.
Marschall
,
C. W.
, and
Maringer
,
R. E.
,
1971
,
J. Inst. Mater.
,
6
, No.
2
, pp.
373
387
.
5.
Meyerson
,
M. R.
,
Frieman
,
L.
, and
Cilles
,
P. M.
,
1969
,
Trans. ASM
, Vol.
62
, pp.
809
809
.
6.
Israeli
,
A.
, and
Papier
,
R.
,
1981
,
ASTM J. Testing Evaluation
,
9
, No.
6
, pp.
348
348
.
7.
Kcanda
,
A. Z.
, and
Wanhein
,
T.
,
1991
,
Proc. IME
, Vol.
205
, No.
83
, pp.
207
214
.
8.
Subhas, B. K., and Katti, R. A., 1984, ASME Paper 84-GT-276.
9.
Subhas, B. K., 1983, MS Research thesis, JNTU.
10.
Jose, K. J., Philip, P. K., and Thomas, P., 1988, 13th AIMTDR Conf. Proceedings, Jadhavapur University, pp. B-45–50.
11.
Wu, S. M., 1964, ASME J. Eng. Ind., pp. 105–110.
12.
Albuelenga
,
A. M.
, and
Danidiery
,
M. A.
,
1983
,
Int. J. MTDR
,
24
, No.
1-B
, pp.
11
18
.
13.
Shin
,
Y. C.
, and
Joo
,
Y. S.
,
1992
,
Int. J. Prod. Res.
,
30
, No.
12
, pp.
2907
2919
.
14.
Prasad, A. V. S. R. K., Rao, P. N., and Rao, U. R. K., 1994, Proceedings of 9th AIMTDR Conference, pp. 455–461.
15.
Harrington
, Jr.,
E. C.
,
1965
,
Ind. Quality Control.
,
21
, No.
10
, pp.
494
498
.
16.
Derringer
,
G.
, and
Suich
,
R.
,
1980
,
J. Quality Technol.
,
12
, No.
4
, pp.
214
219
.
17.
Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Holedrilling Strain-Gage Method, 1987, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03-01, E837-85, pp. 991–997.
18.
Tsuchida
,
K.
,
Kawada
,
Y.
, and
Kodama
,
S.
,
1975
,
Bull. JSME
,
18
, No.
116
, pp.
123
130
.
You do not currently have access to this content.