The work presented in this paper compares the performance and emissions of the UBC “Squish-Jet” fast-burn combustion chamber with a baseline bowl-in-piston (BIP) chamber. It was found that the increased turbulence generated in the fastburn combustion chambers resulted in 5 to 10 percent faster burning of the air–fuel mixture compared to a conventional BIP chamber. The faster burning was particularly noticeable when operating with lean air–fuel mixtures. The study was conducted at a 1.7 mm clearance height and 10.2:1 compression ratio. Measurements were made over a range of air–fuel ratios from stoichiometric to the lean limit. At each operating point all engine performance parameters, and emissions of nitrogen oxides, unburned hydrocarbons, and carbon monoxide were recorded. At selected operating points a record of cylinder pressure was obtained and analyzed off-line to determine mass-burn rate in the combustion chamber. Two piston designs were tested at wide-open throttle conditions and 2000 rpm to determine the influence of piston geometry on the performance and emissions parameters. The UBC squish-jet combustion chamber design demonstrates significantly better performance parameters and lower emission levels than the conventional BIP design. Mass-burn fraction calculations showed a significant reduction in the time to burn the first 10 percent of the charge, which takes approximately half of the time to burn from 10 to 90 percent of the charge.

1.
Andrews
J. G. E.
,
Bradley
D.
, and
Lwakabamba
S. B.
,
1976
, “
Turbulence and Turbulent Flame Propagation—a Critical Appraisal
,”
Combustion and Flame
, Vol.
24
, pp.
285
304
.
2.
Bopp, S., Vafidis, C., and Whitelaw, J. H., 1986, “The Effect of Engine Speed on the TDC Flow Field in a Motored Reciprocating Engine,” SAE Paper No. 860023.
3.
Cameron, C., 1985, “An Investigation of Squish Generated Turbulence in IC Engines,” M.Sc. Thesis, (AFL-85-02), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
4.
Daneshyar, H., and Fuller, D. E., 1986, “Definition and Measurement of Turbulence Parameters in Reciprocating IC Engines,” SAE Paper No. 861529.
5.
Dohring, K., 1986, “The Relative Effects of Intake and Compression Stroke Generated Turbulence on I.C. Engine Combustion Duration,” UBC Alternative Fuels Laboratory Report, AFL-86-01, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (not published).
6.
Dymala-Dolesky, R., 1986, “The Effects of Turbulence Enhancements on the Performance of a Spark-Ignition Engine,” M.Sc. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
7.
Evans
R. L.
,
1986
, “
Internal Combustion Engine Squish Jet Combustion Chamber
,”
US Patent
,
572
, No.
4
,
123
123
.
8.
Evans, R. L., and Cameron, C., 1986, “A New Combustion Chamber for Fast Burn Applications,” SAE Paper No. 860319.
9.
Evans, R. L., and Dohring, K. W., 1987, “A Rapid Intake and Compression Machine for Fundamental Combustion Research,” presented at the Energy-Sources Technology Conference and Exhibition, Dallas, TX.
10.
Evans, R. L., and Tippett, E. C., 1990a, “The Effects of Squish Motion on the Burn-Rate and Performance of a Spark-Ignition Engine,” presented at SAE Technical Paper Series, Future Transportation Technology Conference and Exposition, San Diego, CA.
11.
Evans, R. L., Tippett, E. C., and Mawle C. D., 1990b, “Fast-Burn Combustion Chamber Design for Natural Gas Fuelled Spark-Ignition Engines,” Proc. Combustion Institute Spring Technical Meeting, Banff, Canada, pp. 20–22.
12.
Evans, R. L., and Blaszczyk, J., 1991a, “Fast-Burn Combustion Chamber Development,” CGA R&D Project Technical Report #200-1.5, Sept. (not published).
13.
Evans, R. L., 1991b, “Improved Squish-Jet Combustion Chamber,” U.S. Patent No. 5,065,715.
14.
Evans, R. L., and Blaszczyk, J., 1992a, “Combustion Chamber Design for a Lean-Burn SI Engine,” Proc. Spring Technical Meeting of Combustion Institute, Canadian Section, University of Alberta, pp. 73–76.
15.
Evans, R. L., and Blaszczyk, J., 1992b, “Low-Emission Combustion Chamber Design,” 25th ISATA International Symposium on Automotive Technology and Automation, Florence, Italy, Paper #920420.
16.
Evans, R. L., and Blaszczyk, J., 1992c, “Combustion Chamber Design for a Lean-Burn SI Engine,” SAE Paper No. 921545.
17.
French, C. C. J., 1983, “A Universal Test Engine for Combustion Research,” SAE Paper No. 830453.
18.
Gruden, D. O., 1981, “Combustion Chamber Layout for Modern Otto Engines,” SAE Paper No. 811231.
19.
Heywood, J. B., 1988, Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 326–370.
20.
Heywood
J. B.
,
1984
, “
Combustion Chamber Design for Optimum Spark Ignition Engine Performance
,”
International Journal of Vehicle Design
, Vol.
5
, No.
3
, pp.
133
147
.
21.
Jane, P. A. H., 1988, “The Development of a Direct Injection Diesel Combustion System for Low Noise Emissions and Mechanical Loading,” C66/68 IMechE.
22.
Jones
A. L.
, and
Evans
R. L.
,
1985
, “
Comparison of Burning Rates in a Natural Gas Fuelled Spark-Ignition Engine
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR GAS TURBINES AND POWER
, Vol.
4
, pp.
908
913
.
23.
Lancaster, D. R., 1986, “Effects of Engine Variables on Turbulence in a Spark Ignition Engine,” SAE Paper No. 760159.
24.
Lancaster, D. R., Kreiger, R. B., et al., 1976, “Effects of Turbulence on Spark Ignition Engine Combustion,” SAE Paper No. 760160.
25.
Matekunas, F. A., 1983, “Modes and Measures of Cyclic Variability,” SAE Paper No. 830337.
26.
Mawle, C. D., 1989, “The Effects of Turbulence and Combustion Chamber Geometry on Combustion in a Spark Ignition Engine,” UBC Alternative Fuels Laboratory Report AFL-89-02, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (not published).
27.
Milane
R. E.
,
Evans
R. L.
, and
Hill
P. G.
,
1987
, “
Combustion and Turbulent Structure in a Closed Chamber With Swirl
,”
Comb. Sci. and Tech.
, Vol.
51
, pp.
1
20
.
28.
Nagayana, I., Araki, Y., and Lioka, Y., 1977, “Effects of Swirl and Squish on SI Engine Combustion and Emission,” SAE Paper No. 770217.
29.
Nakamura, H., et al., 1976, “Development of a New Combustion System (MCA-Jet) in Gasoline Engine,” SAE Paper No. 790016.
30.
Overington, M. T., and Thring, R. H., 1981, “Gasoline Engine Combustion Turbulence and the Combustion Chamber,” SAE Paper No. 810017.
31.
Semenov, E. S., 1963, “Studies of Turbulent Gas Flow in Piston Engines,” Tech. Trans., F97 NASA.
32.
Shimoda, M., et al., 1985, “Effect of Combustion Chamber Configuration on In-Cylinder Air Motion and Combustion Characteristics of CI Diesel Engine,” SAE Paper No. 850070.
33.
Tippett, E. C., 1989, “The Effects of Combustion Chamber Design on Turbulence, Cyclic Variation and Performance in an SI Engine,” UBC Alternative Fuels Laboratory Report, AFL-89-01, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada (not published).
34.
Winsor, R. E., and Patterson, D. J., 1973, “Mixture Turbulence—A Key to Cyclic Combustion Variation,” SAE Paper No. 730086.
35.
Witze, P. O., 1977, “Measurements of Spatial Distribution and Engine Speed Dependence of Turbulent Air Motion in an IC Engine,” SAE Paper No. 770220.
36.
Young, M. B., 1980, “Cyclic Dispersion—Some Quantitative Cause-and-Effect Relationships,” SAE Paper No. 800459.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.