This paper presents a general design approach involving automatic, intelligent process simulation procedures. The aim is to derive a general set of design principles and methodologies that can be developed into computer-assisted procedures. This first part deals with numerical, quantitative calculations, i.e., with what commonly goes under the name of “Numerical Process Simulation.” It is argued that the existing design methods can result in computer codes or packages that perform exactly (and deterministically) the numerical operations an engineer would perform. It is also shown that modularity in these codes is dictated by the necessity of automatically implementing numerical procedures that depend on the structure of the process under examination, rather than by user’s convenience and ease of maintenance. An example of a modular, structure-oriented code (CAMEL) is given and discussed in detail, while numerical applications are discussed elsewhere [4]. The second part deals with the more complex qualitative approach to process design, i.e., with the possibility of implementing automatic “expert” procedures that perform the same conceptual tasks as human process engineers. It is shown that by means of Artificial Intelligence techniques it is possible to mimic (to an extent) the “thinking patterns” of a human expert, and to produce process schemes that are both acceptable and realistic. A general process synthesis package (COLOMBO) is described and some of its applications discussed. The main goal of the two parts of the paper is to show that the very complex activity of process design can be executed automatically, not only in principle, but in actual applications, and that both qualitative synthesis and quantitative calculations are possible with the present state of the art of our computational facilities.

Issue Section:
Advanced Energy Systems
Topics:
Artificial intelligence, Computers, Design, Design methodology, Engineers, Maintenance, Process design, Process simulation
1.
A. Bejan, G. Tsatsaronis, and M. Moran, Thermal Design and Optimization, Wiley, 1995.
2.
F. Bosniakovic, Waermediagramme fuer Vergasung Verbrennung und Russbildung, Springer Verlag, 1956.
3.
L. F. Drbal, ed., Black & Veatch Power Plant Engineering, Chapman & Hall, 1996.
4.
M. F. Falcetta and E. Sciubba, “A computational modular approach to the simulation of powerplants,” Heat Recovery Syst. & CHP, Vol. 15, No. 2, 1995.
5.
C. A. Frangopoulos, “Application of the thermoeconomic optimization method to the CGAM problem,” Energy, Spec. Ed., Vol. 19, 1994.
6.
E. Gyftopoulos, ed., Industrial Energy Conservation Manuals, MIT Press, 1982.
7.
J. L. Kuester and H. Mize, Optimization Techniques With FORTRAN, McGraw-Hill, 1983.
8.
R. Melli, B. Paoletti, and E. Sciubba, “SYSLAM: an interactive expert system approach to powerplant design and optimization,” IJEEE, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1992.
9.
P. Y. Papalambros, and D. J. Wilde, Principles of optimal design: Modeling and Computation, Cambridge University Press, 1988.
10.
W. C. Press, Numerical Recipes, McGraw-Hill, 1985.
11.
G. V. Reklaitis, A. Ravindran, and K. M. Ragsdell, Engineering Optimization, Wiley, 1983.
12.
M. Rettaroli and E. Sciubba, MASAI: a code for the symbolic calculation of powerplants, ASME PD/64/3, Proc. ESDA Conf., London 1994.
13.
W. C. Reynolds, Thermodynamic Properties in SI, Stanford University Press, 1979.
14.
W. F. Stoecker, Design of Thermal Systems, McGraw-Hill, 1980.
15.
G. Tsatsaronis and J. Pisa, “Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of energy systems: application to the CGAM problem,” Energy, Spec. Ed., Vol. 19, 1994.
16.
A. Valero and C. Torres, Algebraic Thermodynamic Analysis of Energy Systems, ASME AES-Vol. 7, 1988.
17.
M. R. von Spakovsky, M. R. Corti, and M. Banato, “The performance optimization of a gas turbine cogeneration/heat pump facility with thermal storage,” ASME JERT, Vol. 117, No. 1, 1995.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.