The ability to understand and manage the performance of hydraulic control valves is important in many automatic and manual industrial processes. The use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) aids in the design of such valves by inexpensively providing insight into flow patterns, potential noise sources, and cavitation. Applications of CFD to study the performance of complex three-dimensional (3D) valves, such as poppet, spool, and butterfly valves, are becoming more common. Still, validation and accuracy remain an issue. The Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equations were solved numerically using the commercial CFD package FLUENT V6.2 to assess the effect of geometry on the performance of a 3D control valve. The influence of the turbulence model and of a cavitation model was also investigated. Comparisons were made to experimental data when available. The 3D model of the valve was constructed by decomposing the valve into several subdomains. Agreement between the numerical predictions and measurements of flow pressure was less than 6% for all cases studied. Passive flow control, designed to minimize vortical structures at the piston exit and reduce potential cavitation, noise, and vibrations, was achieved by geometric smoothing. In addition, these changes helped to increase Cv and reduce the area affected by cavitation as it is related to the jet shape originated at the valve throat. The importance of accounting for full 3D geometry effects in modeling and optimizing control valve performance was demonstrated via CFD. This is particularly important in the vicinity of the piston. It is worth noting that the original geometry resulted in a lower Cv with higher velocity magnitude within the valve, whereas after smoothing Cv increased and served to delay cavitation inception.

1.
Skousen
,
P. L.
, 1998,
Valve Handbook
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
2.
Versteeg
,
H. K.
, and
Malalasekera
,
W.
, 1995,
An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics. The Finite Volume Method
,
Longman
,
England
.
3.
Chung
,
T. J.
, 2002,
Computational Fluid Dynamics
,
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
.
4.
Sierra-Espinosa
,
F. Z.
,
Bates
,
C. J.
, and
O’Doherty
,
T.
, 2000, “
Turbulent Flow in a 90° Pipe Junction Part 1: Decay of Fluctuations Upstream the Flow Bifurcation
,”
Chimia
0009-4293,
29
, pp.
197
213
.
5.
Sierra-Espinosa
,
F. Z.
,
Bates
,
C. J.
, and
O’Doherty
,
T.
, 2000, “
Turbulent Flow in a 90° Pipe Junction Part 2: Reverse Flow at the Branch Exit
,”
Chimia
0009-4293,
29
, pp.
215
233
.
6.
Famiyesin
,
O. O. R.
,
Oliver
,
K. D.
, and
Rodger
,
A. A.
, 2002, “
Semi-Empirical Equations for Pipeline Design by the Finite Element Method
,”
Comput. Struct.
0045-7949,
80
, pp.
1369
1382
.
7.
Lavedrine
,
I.
, and
Woolf
,
D.
, 1995,
Application of CFD Modelling to Hydraulic Structures
,
Water Software Systems, Theory and Application, Research Studies
,
Baldock, Hertfordshire, England
.
8.
Bansal
,
R. K.
,
Walker
,
J. T.
,
Gardisser
,
D. R.
, and
Grift
,
T. E.
, 1998, “
Validating Fluent for the Flow of Granular Materials in Aerial Spreaders
,”
Trans. ASAE
0001-2351,
41
, pp.
29
35
.
9.
Xing
,
T.
, and
Frankel
,
S. H.
, 2002, “
Effect of Cavitation on Vortex Dynamics in a Submerged Laminar Jet
,”
AIAA J.
0001-1452,
40
, pp.
2266
2276
.
10.
Ito
,
K.
,
Takahashi
,
K.
, and
Inoue
,
K.
, 1993, “
Flow in a Poppet Valve (Computation of Pressure Distribution Using a Streamline Coordinate System)
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. A
0387-5008,
36
, pp.
42
50
.
11.
Nadarajah
,
S.
,
Balabani
,
S.
,
Tindal
,
M. J.
, and
Yianneskis
,
M.
, 1998, “
The Turbulence Structure of the Annular Non-Swirling Flow Past an Axisymmetric Poppet Valve
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0954-4062,
212
, pp.
455
472
.
12.
Nadarajah
,
S.
,
Balabani
,
S.
,
Tindal
,
M. J.
, and
Yianneskis
,
M.
, 1998, “
The Effect of Swirl on the Annular Flow Past an Axisymmetric Poppet Valve
,”
Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part C: J. Mech. Eng. Sci.
0954-4062,
212
, pp.
473
484
.
13.
Min
,
B.
,
Xin
,
F.
, and
Ying
,
C.
, 2001, “
Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach to Pressure Loss Analysis of Hydraulic Spool Valve
,”
Fifth International Conference on Fluid Power Transmission and Control, ICFP 2001
,
Hangzhou, China
.
14.
Kerh
,
T.
,
Lee
,
J. J.
, and
Wellford
,
L. C.
, 1997, “
Transient Fluid-Structure Interaction in a Control Valve
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
119
, pp.
354
359
.
15.
Huang
,
C.
, and
Kim
,
R. H.
, 1996, “
Three-Dimensional Analysis of Partially Open Butterfly Valve Flows
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
118
, pp.
562
568
.
16.
Davis
,
J. A.
, and
Stewart
,
M.
, 2002, “
Predicting Globe Control Valve Performance-Part I: CFD Modeling
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
124
, pp.
772
777
.
17.
Davis
,
J. A.
, and
Stewart
,
M.
, 2002, “
Predicting Globe Control Valve Performance-Part II: Experimental Verification
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
124
, pp.
778
783
.
18.
Roorda
,
O.
, 1998, “
Computer Simulation Helps Reduce Pressure Loss
,”
Water Eng. Manage.
0273-2238,
145
, pp.
22
24
.
19.
Ueno
,
H.
,
Okajima
,
A.
,
Tanaka
,
H.
, and
Hasegawa
,
T.
, 1994, “
Noise Measurement and Numerical Simulation of Oil Flow in Pressure Control Valves
,”
Trans. Jpn. Soc. Mech. Eng., Ser. A
0387-5008,
37
, pp.
336
341
.
20.
Knapp
,
R. T.
,
Daily
,
J. W.
, and
Hammit
,
F. G.
, 1970,
Cavitation
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
21.
Abuaf
,
N.
,
Wu
,
B. J. C.
,
Zimmer
,
G. A.
, and
Saha
,
P.
, 1981, “
A Study of Nonequilibrium Flashing of Water in a Converging-Diverging Nozzle
,”
Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
, Report No. NUREG/CR 1864.
22.
Stutz
,
B.
, and
Reboud
,
J. L.
, 2000, “
Measurements Within Unsteady Cavitation
,”
Exp. Tech.
0732-8818,
29
, pp.
545
552
.
23.
Ferziger
,
J. H.
, and
Peric
,
M.
, 1997,
Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics
,
Springer
,
Berlin
.
24.
Launder
,
B. E.
, and
Spalding
,
D. B.
, 1972,
Lectures in Mathematical Models of Turbulence
,
Academic
,
London
.
25.
Palau-Salvador
,
G.
,
Arviza
,
J.
, and
Frankel
,
S. H.
, 2004, “
Three-Dimensional Control Valve With Complex Geometry: CFD Modeling and Experimental Validation
,”
34th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit
,
Portland, OR
.
26.
Patankar
,
S. V.
, 1980,
Numerical Heat Transport and Fluid Flow
,
Taylor & Francis
,
New York
.
27.
Singhal
,
A. K.
,
Athavale
,
M. M.
,
Huiying
,
L.
, and
Jiang
,
L.
, 2002, “
Mathematical Bases and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
0098-2202,
124
, pp.
617
624
.
28.
Palau-Salvador
,
G.
, and
Frankel
,
S. H.
, 2004, “
Numerical Modeling of Cavitation Using Fluent: Validation and Parametric Studies
,”
34th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference and Exhibit
,
Portland, OR
.
29.
Gopalan
,
S.
,
Katz
,
J.
, and
Knio
,
O.
, 1999, “
The Flow Structure in the Near Field of Jets and Its Effect on Cavitation Inception
,”
J. Fluid Mech.
0022-1120,
398
, pp.
1
43
.
30.
Cerutti
,
S.
,
Omar
,
M. K.
, and
Katz
,
J.
, 2000, “
Numerical Study of Cavitation Inception in the Near Field of an Axisymmetric Jet at High Reynolds Number
,”
Phys. Fluids
1070-6631,
12
, pp.
2444
2460
.
31.
Palau
,
C. V.
,
Arregui
,
F. J.
,
Palau-Salvador
,
G.
, and
Espert
,
V.
, 2004, “
Velocity Profile Effect on Woltman Water Meters Performance
,”
12th International Conference on Flow Measurement
,
Beijing, China
.
You do not currently have access to this content.