The local distributions of void fraction, interfacial frequency, and velocity have been measured in annular flow of R-134a through a wall-heated, high aspect ratio duct. High aspect ratio ducts provide superior optical access to tubes or irregular geometries. This work expands upon earlier experiments conducted with adiabatic flows in the same test section. Use of thin, transparent heater films on quartz windows provided sufficient electrical power capacity to produce the full range of two-phase conditions of interest. With wall vapor generation, the system pressure was varied from 0.9 to 2.4 MPa, thus allowing the investigation of flows with liquid-to-vapor density ratios covering the range of about 7 to 27, far less than studied in air-water and similar systems. There is evidence that for a given cross-sectional average void fraction, the local phase distributions can be different depending on whether the vapor phase is generated at the wall, or upstream of the test section inlet. In wall-heated flows, local void fraction profiles measured across both the wide and narrow test section dimensions illustrate the profound effect that pressure has on the local flow structure; notably, increasing pressure appears to thin the wall-bounded liquid films and redistribute liquid toward the edges of the test section. This general trend is also manifested in the distributions of mean droplet diameter and interfacial area density, which are inferred from local measurements of void fraction, droplet frequency and velocity. At high pressure, the interfacial area density is increased due to the significant enhancement in droplet concentration.

1.
Hewitt, G. F., and Hall-Taylor, N. S., 1970, Annular Two-Phase Flow, Pergamon Press, New York.
2.
Azzopardi
,
B. J.
,
1997
, “
Drops in Annular Two-Phase Flow
,”
Int. J. Multiphase Flow
,
23, Suppl.
, pp.
1
53
.
3.
Henstock
,
W. H.
, and
Hanratty
,
T. J.
,
1976
, “
The Interfacial Drag and Height of the Wall Layer in Annular Flow
,”
AIChE J.
,
22
, pp.
990
1000
.
4.
Tatterson
,
D. F.
,
Dallman
,
J. C.
, and
Hanratty
,
T. J.
,
1977
, “
Drop Sizes in Annular Gas-Liquid Flows
,”
AIChE J.
,
23
, pp.
68
76
.
5.
Hanratty, T. J., and Dykhno, L. A., 1997, “Physical Issues in Analyzing Gas-Liquid Annular Flow,” Exp. Heat Transfer Fluid Mech. Thermodyn. Ed. ETS, 2, pp. 1127–1136.
6.
Kataoka, I., and Ishii, M., 1982, “Mechanism and Correlation of Droplet Entrainment and Deposition in Annular Two-Phase Flow,” Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-82-44.
7.
Kataoka
,
I.
, and
Serizawa
,
A.
,
1990
, “
Interfacial Area Concentration in Bubbly Flow
,”
Nucl. Eng. Des.
,
120
, pp.
163
180
.
8.
Trabold
,
T. A.
,
Kumar
,
R.
, and
Vassallo
,
P. F.
,
1999
, “
Experimental Study of Dispersed Droplets in High-Pressure Annular Flow
,”
ASME J. Heat Transfer
,
121
, pp.
924
933
.
9.
Trabold
,
T. A.
, and
Kumar
,
R.
,
2000a
, “
Vapor Core Turbulence in Annular Two-Phase Flow
,”
Exp. Fluids
,
28
, pp.
187
194
.
10.
Trabold
,
T. A.
, and
Kumar
,
R.
,
2000b
, “
High Pressure Annular Two-Phase Flow in a Narrow Duct. Part I: Local Measurements in the Droplet Field
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
122
, pp.
364
374
.
11.
Kumar
,
R.
, and
Trabold
,
T. A.
,
2000
, “
High Pressure Annular Two-Phase Flow in a Narrow Duct. Part II: Three-Field Modeling
,”
ASME J. Fluids Eng.
,
122
, pp.
375
384
.
12.
Ishii, M., and Mishima, K., 1981, “Study of Two-Fluid Model and Interfacial Area,” Argonne National Laboratory Report ANL-80-111.
13.
Galaup, J. P., 1976, “Contribution to the Study of Methods for Measuring Two-Phase Flow,” Center D’Etudes Nucleaires de Grenoble, Report No. 136.
14.
Wales
,
C. E.
,
1966
, “
Physical and Chemical Absorption in Two-Phase Annular and Dispersed Horizontal Flow
,”
AIChE J.
,
12
, pp.
1166
1171
.
You do not currently have access to this content.