Experimental and numerical investigations are made on the behavior of droplets in a hollow-cone spray paying attention to the liquid sheet formed at the orifice of pressure-swirl atomizer. Simultaneous measurements of droplet sizes and velocities are made by phase-Doppler technique and numerical simulations are carried out based on the transient Eulerian equations for the gas and the Lagrangian equation for the droplets, taking account of the liquid sheet formed at the atomizer orifice. It is shown that the simulation gives good predictions by incorporating the existence of the liquid sheet. The predicted results indicate that the movement of the liquid sheet induces a strong air stream which acts as a strong side wind against the droplets immediately after breakup. This air stream selectively transports small droplets toward the central region and plays an essential role in the classification of droplets by size. Accordingly, the existence of the liquid sheet is significant for the characteristics of droplet dispersion and it should not be neglected in the prediction of hollow-cone spray flows. In addition, the shape of the liquid sheet is theoretically computed based on the simplified equations of motion. The comparison between the theoretical computation and the experimental result suggests that the surface tension of liquid is predominant in determining the shape of the liquid sheet.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Air flow, Drops, Sprays, Shapes, Computation, Computer simulation, Equations of motion, Flow (Dynamics), Pressure, Simulation, Surface tension, Transients (Dynamics), Wind
1.
Bayvel, L., and Orzechowski, Z., 1993, Liquid Atomization, Combustion: An International Series, Chigier, N., ed., Taylor & Francis.
2.
Chen
S. K.
,
Lefebvre
A. H.
, and
Rollbuhler
J.
,
1992
, “
Factors Influencing the Effective Spray Cone Angle of Pressure-Swirl Atomizers
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
, Vol.
114
, pp.
97
–
103
.
3.
Chigier
N.
,
1983
, “
Drop Size and Velocity Instrumentation
,”
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
, Vol.
9
, pp.
155
–
177
.
4.
Chigier
N.
,
1991
, “
Optical Imaging of Sprays
,”
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
, Vol.
17
, pp.
211
–
262
.
5.
Edwards, C. F., and Rudoff, R. C., 1990, “Structure of Swirl-Stabilized Spray Flame by Imaging, Laser Doppler Velocimetry and Phase Doppler Anemometry,” Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1353–1359.
6.
Eisenklam, P., 1976, “Recent Research and Development Work on Liquid Atomization in Europe and the U.S.A.,” 5th Conference on Liquid Atomization, Tokyo.
7.
El Banhawy
Y.
, and
Whitelaw
J. H.
,
1980
, “
Calculation of the Flow Properties of a Confined Kerosene-Spray Flame
,”
AIAA Journal
, Vol.
18
, pp.
1503
–
1510
.
8.
Faeth
G. M.
,
1987
, “
Mixing Transport and Combustion in Sprays
,”
Progress in Energy and Combustion Science
, Vol.
13
, pp.
293
–
345
.
9.
Giffen, E., and Massey, B. S., 1950, Report 1950/5, Motor Industry Research Association, England.
10.
Lefebvre, A. H., 1989a, Atomization and Sprays, Combustion: An International Series, Chigier, N. ed., Hemisphere, Taylor & Francis Group.
11.
Lefebvre, A. H., 1989b, Atomization and Sprays, Combustion: An International Series, Chigier, N. ed., Hemisphere, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 112–113.
12.
Lefebvre, A. H., 1989c, Atomization and Sprays, Combustion: An International Series, Chigier, N. ed., Hemisphere, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 68–70.
13.
Li, S. C., Libby, P. A., and Williams, F. A., 1992, “Experimental and Theoretical Studies of Counterflow Spray Diffusion Flames,” Twenty-Fourth Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1503–1512.
14.
McDonell, V. G., and Samuelsen, G. S., 1988, “Application of Two-Component Phase Doppler Interferometry to the Measurement of Particle Size, Mass Flux, and Velocities in Two-Phase Flows,” Twenty-Second Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1961–1971.
15.
McDonell
V. G.
,
Adachi
M.
, and
Samuelsen
G. S.
,
1992
, “
Structure of Reacting and Non-Reacting Swirling Air-Assisted Sprays
,”
Combustion Science and Technology
, Vol.
82
, pp.
225
–
248
.
16.
O’Rourke, P. J., 1981, “Collective Drop Effects on Vaporizing Liquid Sprays,” Ph.D. thesis, Princeton University.
17.
Presser, C., Gupta, A. K., Avedisian, C. T., and Semerjian, H. G., 1990, “Fuel Property Effects on the Structure of Spray Flames,” Twenty-Third Symposium (International) on Combustion, The Combustion Institute, pp. 1361–1367.
18.
Presser
C.
,
Gupta
A. K.
, and
Semerjian
H. G.
,
1993
, “
Aerodynamic Characteristics of Swirling Spray Flames: Pressure Jet Atomizer
,”
Combustion and Flame
, Vol.
92
, pp.
25
–
44
.
19.
Rizk, N. K., and Lefebvre, A. H., 1985, “Prediction of Velocity Coefficient and Spray Cone Angle for Simplex Swirl Atomizers,” 3rd International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, London, Vol. 111C/2, pp. 1–16.
20.
Rosa
A. B.
,
Sankar
S. V.
,
Wang
G.
, and
Bachalo
W. D.
,
1993
, “
Particle Diagnostics and Turbulence Measurements in a Confined Isothermal Spray
,”
ASME Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
, Vol.
115
, pp.
499
–
506
.
21.
Sirignano
W. A.
,
1993
, “
Fluid Dynamics of Sprays—1992 Freeman Scholar Lecture
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING
, Vol.
115
, pp.
345
–
378
.
22.
Takagi
T.
,
Fang
C. Y.
,
Kamimoto
T.
, and
Okamoto
T.
,
1991
, “
Numerical Simulation of Evaporation, Ignition and Combustion of Transient Sprays
,”
Combustion Science and Technology
, Vol.
75
, pp.
1
–
12
.
23.
York
J. L.
,
Stubbs
H. F.
, and
Tek
M. R.
,
1953
, “
The Mechanism of Disintegration of Liquid Sheets
,”
Trans. ASME
, Vol.
75
, pp.
1279
–
1286
.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.