This study uses a nonlinear optimization method coupled with a vortex lattice cavitating propeller analysis method to design efficient propeller blades. Different constraints are imposed to improve propeller design. Several advancements in the method are shown, including the option for quadratic skew, user specified skew distribution, and a constraint limiting the minimum pressure in wetted regions of the blade. Results for a series of fully wetted runs demonstrate the effectiveness of the constraint on minimum pressure in preventing the onset of bubble or mid-chord cavitation. A comparison of a design in uniform inflow with a design in non-axisymmetric inflow indicates that a propeller designed by the present method in non-axisymmetric inflow has more favorable cavitating flow characteristics than a propeller design assuming uniform inflow. Results are also shown for a series of runs utilizing the cavity constraints. These results indicate that the present method can be used to improve on propeller designs by imposing constraints on the cavity area and cavity volume velocity harmonics, as well as by using a quadratic skew distribution.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Blades, Design methodology, Propellers, Design, Inflow, Cavities, Pressure, Bubbles, Cavitation, Chords (Trusses), Flow (Dynamics), Optimization, Vortices
1.
Briancon-Marjollet
L.
,
Franc
J.
, and
Michel
J.
,
1990
, “
Transient Bubbles Interacting with an Attached Cavity and the Boundary Layer
,”
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
, Vol.
218
, pp.
355
–
376
.
2.
Brockett, T., 1966, “Minimum Pressure Envelopes for Modified NACA-66 Sections with NACA a = 0.8 Camber and Buships Type I and Type II Sections,” DTNSRDC, Teddington, England.
3.
Choi, J.-K., and Kinnas, S., 1997, “Cavitating Propeller Analysis inside of a Tunnel,” Proc. Cavitation and Multiphase Flow Forum, Vancouver, Canada. Fluids Engineering Division, ASME.
4.
Coney, W. B., 1989, “A Method for the Design of a Class of Optimum Marine Propulsors,” Ph.D. thesis, MIT, Department of Ocean Engineering.
5.
Greeley, D., and Kerwin, J., 1982, “Numerical Methods for Propeller Design and Analysis in Steady Flow,” Trans. SNAME, Vol. 90.
6.
Kerwin, J., 1973, “Computer Techniques for Propeller Blade Design,” International Shipbuilding Progress, Vol. 20, No. 227.
7.
Kerwin, J., Keenan, D., Black, S., and Diggs, J., 1994, “A Coupled Viscous/Potential Flow Design Method for Wake Adapted Multi-Stage, Ducted Propulsors Using Generalized Geometry,” Trans. SNAME, Vol. 102.
8.
Kerwin, J., Kinnas, S., Wilson, M., and McHugh, J., 1986, “Experimental and Analytical Techniques for the Study of Unsteady Propeller Sheet Cavitation,” Proc. Sixteenth Symposium on Naval Hydrodynamics, Berkeley, CA.
9.
Kinnas, S., and Pyo, S., 1997, “Propeller Wake Alignment Models in Uniform and Inclined Inflow,” Proc. Propellers/Shafting ’97 Symposium, Virginia Beach, VA., Soc. Naval Arch. & Marine Engnrs.
10.
Lee, C., 1979, “Prediction of Steady and Unsteady Performance of Marine Propellers with or without Cavitation by Numerical Lifting Surface Theory,” Ph.D. thesis, M.I.T., Department of Ocean Engineering.
11.
Mishima, S., 1996, “Design of Cavitating Propeller Blades in Non-Uniform Flow by Numerical Optimization,” Ph.D. thesis, Department of Ocean Engineering, MIT.
12.
Mishima
S.
, and
Kinnas
S.
,
1997
, “
Application of a Numerical Optimization Technique to the Design of Cavitating Propellers in Non-Uniform Flow
,”
Journal of Ship Research
, Vol.
41
, pp.
93
–
107
.
13.
Parsons, M. G., and Greenblatt, J. E., 1978, “Optimization of Propeller Skew Distribution to Minimize the Vibratory Forces and Moments Acting on the Propeller Hub,” The University of Michigan, Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering.
14.
Sparenberg, J., 1995, Hydrodynamic Propulsion and Its Optimization-Analytic Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.