A methodology to determine the experimental uncertainties associated with regressions is presented. When a regression model is used to represent experimental information, the uncertainty associated with the model is affected by random, systematic, and correlated systematic uncertainties associated with the experimental data. The key to the proper estimation of the uncertainty associated with a regression is a careful, comprehensive accounting of systematic and correlated systematic uncertainties. The methodology presented in this article is developed by applying uncertainty propagation techniques to the linear regression analysis equations. The effectiveness of this approach was investigated and proven using Monte Carlo simulations. The application of that methodology to the calibration of a venturi flowmeter and its subsequent use to determine flowrate in a test is demonstrated. It is shown that the previously accepted way of accounting for the contribution of discharge coefficient uncertainty to the overall flowrate uncertainty does not correctly account for all uncertainty sources, and the appropriate approach is developed, discussed, and demonstrated.

Issue Section:
Research Papers
Topics:
Uncertainty, Accounting, Calibration, Discharge coefficient, Engineering simulation, Flowmeters, Regression analysis, Regression models, Simulation, Venturi tubes
1.
Bean, Howard S. (ed.), 1971, Fluid Meters: Their Theory and Application, 6th ed., American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
2.
Brown, Kendall K., Coleman, Hugh W., and Steele, W. Glenn, 1995, “Estimating Uncertainty Intervals for Linear Regression,” AIAA Paper 95-0796, 33rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit.
3.
Brown, Kendall K., 1996, “Assessment of the Experimental Uncertainty Associated with Regressions,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL.
4.
Brown, Kendall K., Coleman, Hugh W., Steele, W. G., and Taylor, Robert P., 1996, “Evaluation of Correlated Bias Error Effects in Experimental Uncertainty Analysis,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 34, No. 5.
5.
Coleman, Hugh W., and Steele, W. Glenn, 1995, “Engineering Application of Experimental Uncertainty Analysis,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 33, No. 10.
6.
Coleman, Hugh W., and Steele, W. Glenn, 1989, Experimentation and Uncertainty Analysis for Engineers, Wiley, New York.
7.
Draper, N. R., and Smith, H., 1981, Applied Regression Analysis, 2nd ed., Wiley, New York.
8.
Montgomery, Douglas C., and Peck, Elizabeth A., 1992, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York.
9.
Natrella, M. G., 1963, Experimental Statistics, NBS Handbook 91, National Bureau of Standards, United States Department of Commerce.
10.
Neter, John, Wasserman, William, and Kutner, Michael H., 1989, Applied Linear Regression Models, 2nd ed., Irwin, Homewood, IL.
11.
Press, William H., Flannery, Brian P., Teukolsky, and Vetterling, William T., 1986, Numerical Recipes: The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12.
Price, Mark L., 1993, “Uncertainty of Derived Results on X-Y Plots,” ISA Technical Paper 93-107, Proceedings of the 39th International Instrumentation Symposium, Instrument Society of America.
13.
Seber, G. A. F., 1977, Linear Regression Analysis, Wiley, New York.
This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright © 1998
 by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.