Wind energy technology is facing new challenges due to the increment in rotor diameter. Nowadays, several studies focus on the development of new flow control methods for load alleviation, in order to increase the lifetime of the blades. This paper describes a shape morphing-based method for smart blades. The study includes an aerodynamic model with a computational search algorithm to find the optimal Cp. A section with shape morphing technology was developed to prove the performance of the method. The smart blade prototype section incorporates a novel structure with a flexible skin and a compliant mechanism. This deformable structure achieves the required displacements for different NACA profiles through camber morphing. In this way, the efficiency and the load variations are improved. The compliant mechanism has to be as light as possible and it has to be competitive in cost. In order to achieve these limitations, different actuating mechanisms were evaluated. Among different possibilities, servo actuators presented higher load/weight capabilities and the required displacement ratios to cover the entire deformable range. The airfoil is modified according to the wind condition and the wind speed is the input variable for controlling the actuators displacement. The control algorithm has a very high frequency response; in this way, the blade profile can be modified in a shorter time and it can respond to high wind velocity variations. Therefore, a deformable section improves the overall performance of wind turbines since it increases power and extends the lifetime of the blades.

References

1.
Hansen
,
M. O. L.
,
2008
,
Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines
, 2nd ed.,
Earthscan
,
London
.
2.
Zhang
,
D.
,
Cross
,
P.
,
Ma
,
X.
, and
Li
,
W.
,
2013
, “
Improved Control of Individual Blade Pitch for Wind Turbines
,”
Sens. Actuators A
,
198
, pp.
8
14
.
3.
Larsen
,
T.
,
Madson
,
H.
, and
Thomson
,
K.
,
2005
, “
Active Load Reduction Using Individual Pitch, Based on Local Blade Flow Measurements
,”
Wind Energy
,
8
(
1
), pp.
67
80
.
4.
Hassan
,
H. M.
,
ElShafei
,
A. L.
,
Farag
,
W. A.
, and
Saad
,
M. S.
,
2012
, “
A Robust LMI-Based Pitch Controller for Large Wind Turbines
,”
Renewable Energy
,
44
, p.
63e71
.
5.
Muljadi
,
E.
,
2001
, “
Pitch-Controlled Variable-Speed Wind Turbine Generation
,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl.
,
37
(
1
), pp.
240
246
.
6.
Bjørn
,
P.
,
2010
, “
Advanced Load Alleviation for Wind Turbines Using Adaptive Trailing Edge Flaps: Sensoring and Control
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Risø National Laboratory for Sustainable Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
7.
Zhang
,
M.
,
Tan
,
B.
, and
Xu
,
J.
,
2016
, “
Smart Fatigue Load Control on the Large-Scale Wind Turbine Blades Using Different Sensing Signals
,”
Renewable Energy
,
87
(
Part 1
), pp.
111
119
.
8.
Zhang
,
M.
,
Tan
,
B.
, and
Xu
,
J.
, “
Parameter Study of Sizing and Placement of Deformable Trailing Edge Flap on Blade Fatigue Load Reduction
,”
Renewable Energy
,
77
, pp.
217
226
.
9.
Fischer
,
J.
,
Weinzierl
,
G.
,
Wagner
,
J.
, and
Pechlivanoglou
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Development of a Flexible Trailing Edge Flap and System Integration Concept for Wind Turbine Blades
,”
First German Wind Energy Conference DEWEK
, Bremen, Germany, Nov. 7–11
10.
Lackner
,
M. A.
, and
van KuikGijs
,
A. M.
,
2010
, “
The Performance of Wind Turbine Smart Rotor Control Approaches During Extreme Loads
,”
ASME J. Sol. Energy Eng.
,
132
(
1
), p.
011008
.
11.
Wilson
,
D. G.
,
Berg
,
D. E.
,
Barone
,
M. F.
,
Berg
,
J. C.
,
Resor
,
B. R.
, and
Lobitz
,
D. W.
,
2009
, “
Active Aerodynamic Blade Control Design for Load Reduction on Large Wind Turbines
,”
European Wind Energy Conference and Exhibition
(
EWEC
), Marseille, France, Mar. 16–19, pp. 1–7.
12.
Gandhi
,
F.
, and
Anusonti-Inthra
,
P.
,
2008
, “
Skin Design Studies for Variable Camber Morphing Airfoils
,”
Smart Mater. Struct.
,
17
(
1
), p.
015025
.
13.
Woods
,
B. K. S.
,
Bilgen
,
O.
, and
Friswell
,
M. I.
,
2012
, “
Wind Tunnel Testing of the Fish Bone Active Camber Morphing Concept
,”
23rd International Conference on Adaptive Structures and Technologies
, Nanjing, China, Oct. 11–13, pp. 1–14.
14.
Puterbaugh
,
M.
, and
Beyene
,
A.
,
2011
, “
Parametric Dependence of a Morphing Wind Turbine Blade on Material Elasticity
,”
Energy
,
36
(
1
), pp.
466
474
.
15.
Cavens
,
W. D. K.
,
2015
, “
Design of a Blade Section Featuring Passive Load Alleviation Capabilities Resulting From Variable Stiffness Morphing Structures With a Focus on Large, Modern Wind Turbines
,”
Masters thesis
, DUWIND—Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
16.
Franco
,
J. A.
,
Jauregui
,
J. C.
, and
Toledano-Ayala
,
M.
,
2015
, “
Optimizing Wind Turbine Efficiency by Deformable Structures in Smart Blades
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
,
137
(
5
), p.
051206
.
17.
Silva
,
C. T.
, and
Donadon
,
M. V.
,
2013
, “
Unsteady Blade Element-Momentum Method Including Returning Wake Effects
,”
J. Aerosp. Technol. Manage.
,
5
(
1
), pp.
27
42
.
18.
Hansen
,
M. O. L.
,
Sørensen
,
J.
,
Voutsinas
,
S.
,
Sørensen
,
N.
, and
Madsen
,
H.
,
2006
, “
State of the Art in Wind Turbine Aerodynamics and Aeroelasticity
,”
Prog. Aerosp. Sci.
,
42
(
4
), pp.
285
330
.
19.
Sanderce
,
B.
,
van der Pijl
,
S. P.
, and
Koren
,
B.
,
2011
, “
Review of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Wind Turbine Wake Aerodynamics
,”
Wind Energ.
,
14
(
7
), pp.
799
819
.
20.
Leishman
,
J.
,
2002
, “
Challenges in Modeling the Unsteady Aerodynamics of Wind Turbines
,”
ASME
Paper No. WIND2002-37.
21.
Lanzafame
,
R.
, and
Messina
,
M.
,
2007
, “
Fluid Dynamics Wind Turbine Design: Critical Analysis, Optimization and Application of BEM Theory
,”
Renewable Energy
,
32
(
14
), pp.
2291
2305
.
22.
Hartenberg
,
R. S.
, and
Denavit
,
J.
,
1965
,
Kinematic Synthesis of Linkages
,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
.
23.
Pechlivanoglou
,
G.
,
2012
, “
Passive and Active Flow Control Solutions for Wind Turbine Blades
,”
Ph.D. thesis
, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin.
You do not currently have access to this content.