Exploration and production (E&P) waste generated by the petroleum industry in Croatia from two central oilfield pits (COPs) was investigated in order to (1) examine materials for waste treatment that can preferentially sorb organic contaminants and, in that way, improve the process of stabilization/solidification (S/S), and (2) find field-acceptable methods to reduce the amount of waste to be treated with S/S or some other method. Composite samples from COP Vinkovci were treated in the laboratory with different materials or with combinations of several materials: (a) Cement, (b) organophilic clay, (c) calcined moler clay, (d) lime+organophilicclay+bentonite, (e) cement+organophilicclay+bentonite, (f) lime+calcined moler clay, and (g) cement+calcined moler clay. A sample of E&P waste treated with lime was used for comparison of results. The most successful treatment for the majority of inorganic and organic pollutants was treatment with organophilic clay. Samples treated with organophilic clay release 63 times less total oils, 67 times less mineral oils, 798 times less naphthalene, and 136 times less lead to distilled water than the sample treated with lime. The next most successful material is calcined moler clay. The results clearly show that reduction in hydrocarbon content using some of the field-acceptable methods and detailed chemical analysis of remaining organic and inorganic pollutants must be implemented before selecting the most appropriate method for treatment of technological waste in petroleum industry. A composite sample from COP Žutica was treated in the laboratory using a four-step procedure involving boiling water, condensate, and organophilic clay. Organophilic clay was used because of its ability to sorb hydrophobic pollutants. In the leachate of an E&P waste sample, the lowest values for the majority of inorganic and organic pollutants were observed following the fourth step (treatment with organophilic clay). This is also manifested in the lowest indicator of total discharge (ITD%) values for the fourth treatment step. Considering the concentrations of analyzed parameters in leachates and their ITD% values, the biggest effect for the majority of inorganic and organic pollutants was achieved between the first and the second treatment step. This suggests that treatment with boiling water is the most effective treatment for the majority of inorganic and organic pollutants. Concentrations of benzene, ethylbenzene, toluene, and xylene (BETX) in distilled-water leachate generally increase after each succeeding treatment step. This shows that BETX is added to the E&P waste through condensate addition in the third treatment step.

1.
Waste Law, 1995, Official Bulletin No. 34/95, Zagreb, Croatia.
2.
Regulation on the Waste Types, 1996, Official Bulletin No. 27/96., Zagreb, Croatia.
3.
Regulation on the Waste Management Conditions, 1997, Official Bulletin No. 123/97, Zagreb, Croatia.
4.
Regulation on the Hazardous Waste Management Conditions, 1998, Official Bulletin No. 32/98., Zagreb, Croatia.
5.
Gaurina-Međimurec
,
N.
,
Krištafor
,
Z.
, and
Matanović
,
D.
, 2000, “
Subsurface Injection of Drilling Fluid Waste
,”
Third International Symposium “Power and Process Plants”
,
Dubrovnik, Croatia
, Jun. 24–26.
6.
Gaurina-Međimurec
,
N.
,
Krištafor
,
Z.
,
Matanović
,
D.
,
Kulenović
,
I.
, and
Gospić-Miočev
,
D.
, 1999, “
Subsurface Disposal of Technological Waste—Present and Future in Croatia
,”
Nafta
,
50
(
9
), Zagreb, Croatia.
7.
Gaurina-Međimurec
,
N.
,
Mayer
,
D.
,
Dragičević
,
I.
,
Matanović
,
D.
,
Kristafor
,
Z.
,
Muvrin
,
B.
,
Durn
,
G.
, and
Laznjak
,
J.
, 1998, “
Study on Environment Impacts of Plant for Treatment of Technological Waste From Oil & Gas Production Process on Field Molve and Injection of Liquid Waste in the Mol-8 Well
,” Faculty for Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Zagreb.
8.
Veil
,
J. A.
, and
Dusseault
M. B.
, 2003, “
Evaluation of Slurry Injection Technology for Management of Drilling Wastes
,” Prepared by Argonne National Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, National Petroleum Technology Office, May, p.
110
.
9.
The Main Standard Mining Project, 1990, “
Elimination of Mud Pits in INA-Naftaplin
,” Zagreb.
10.
Durn
,
G.
,
Gaurina-Međimurec
,
N.
,
Fröschl
,
H.
,
Meandžija
,
I.
,
Veronek
,
B.
, and
Mesić
,
S.
, 2004, “
The Geochemical and Mineralogical Assessment of Lime Stabilized Waste From the Petroleum Industry in Croatia
,”
ASME J. Energy Resour. Technol.
0195-0738,
126
, pp.
112
118
.
11.
LaGrega
,
M. D.
,
Buckingham
,
P. L.
, and
Evans
,
J. C.
, 1994,
Hazardous Waste Management
,
McGraw-Hill
,
Singapore
.
12.
Smith
,
A. S.
, 1998, “Stabilization/Solidification Processes,” “
NATO/CCMS Pilot Study, Evaluation of Demonstrated and Emerging Technologies for the Treatment and Clean Up of Contaminated Land and Groundwater
,” Final Report, No. 219, Phase II, pp.
8
–1–8–
11
.
13.
Montgomery
,
D. M.
,
Sollars
,
C. J.
,
Perry
,
R.
,
Tarling
,
E.
,
Barnes
,
O.
, and
Handerson
,
E.
, 1991, “
Treatment of Organic-Contaminated Industrial Wastes Using Cement-Based Stabilization/Solidification—I. Microstructural Analysis of Cement-Organic Interactions
,”
Waste Manage. Res.
0734-242X,
9
, pp.
103
111
.
14.
Jones
,
L. W.
, 1990, “
Interference Mechanisms in Waste Stabilization/Solidification Processes
,” U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/2–89/067, Cincinnati, OH.
15.
Durn
,
G.
,
Gaurina-Međimurec
,
N.
,
Slovenec
,
D.
,
Tadej
,
N.
,
Mileusnić
,
M.
,
Veronek
,
B.
, and
Mesić
,
S.
, 2002, “
Study of the Efficiency of Solidification, Selection and Efficiency of Alternative Methods of Treatment of Technological Waste in Central Oilfield Pit Vinkovci
,” Faculty of Mining, Geology and Petroleum Engineering, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, pp.
1
168
.
16.
Durn
,
G.
,
Gaurina-Međimurec
,
N.
,
Veronek
,
B.
,
Mesić
,
S.
,
Fröschl
,
H.
, and
Čović
,
M.
, 2003, “
Laboratory Investigation of New Materials for the Treatment of Hazardous Waste From Petroleum Engineering, 2
,”
International Oil and Gas Conference “Oil and Gas Technology Development in the World Globalization Processes”
,
Zadar, Croatia
, pp.
1
10
.
17.
Ferrari
,
G.
,
Cecconi
,
F.
, and
Xiao
,
L.
, 2000, Drilling Wastes Treatment and Management Practices for Reducing Impact on HSE: ENI/Agip Experiences, Presented at the
SPE International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition
,
Beijing, China
, Paper No. SPE 64635, pp.
1
11
.
18.
Veil
,
J. A.
, 2002, “
Drilling Waste Management: Past, Present, and Future
,”
SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition
,
San Antonio, TX
, Sept. 29—Oct. 2.
19.
Veil
,
J. A.
, 2004, “
Drilling Waste Management System Offers Web-Based Support to Operators
,”
SPE Oil and Gas Waste Disposal Workshop
,
Houston, TX
, Nov. 9–10.
You do not currently have access to this content.