This paper describes the LCA environmental impacts resulting from fuel fired co-generation systems using our NETS (Numerical Eco-load Total Standard, [1]) scheme having GUI (Graphic User Interface). Following a brief introduction of the NETS evaluation method, firstly the total eco-load from commercial electricity power plants in Japan is numerically calculated in the NETS unit. We take here almost all factors into account including fuel mining, transportation and processing, plant manufacturing, assembling and its building construction, fuel consumption and maintenance during twenty durable years, plant dismantling and waste processing, thermal efficiency and delivery loss, etc. This evaluation greatly helps in the eco-load estimation of co-generation plants when electricity purchase is needed during the plant operation with a minimum eco-load. Next, co-generation systems are paid attention to their ecological effectiveness. Here, we select different fuel fired co-generation plants of natural gas, heavy oil, and coal. Environmental impacts resulting from the respective plants include fossil fuel depletion and natural resources depletion, global warming due to green house gases, ozone layer depletion due to CFC type gas emission, various water and air pollution, rain acidification due to NOx and SOx, waste processing, recycling etc. Each item can be successfully calculated from the inventory database accumulated by authors. Hourly energy demands of electricity and heat (steam, hot water and cold water) are set to a typical model for eight office buildings and two hotels. The NETS method is applied to the co-generation model, resulting in the best cost-operating scheme of co-generation plants with a minimum environmental impact.

1.
Kato
,
S.
, and
Widiyanto
,
A.
, 1999, “A Life Cycle Assessment Scheme for Environmental Load of Power Generation Systems with NETS Evaluation Method,” Proc. of IJPGC 1999, ASME, I, pp. 139–145.
2.
Heijungs, R. Ed., 1992, “Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products-Guide and Background (English Ed.),” Leiden: Center of Environmental Science.
3.
Steen, B., and Ryding, S. O., 1992, “The EPS Enviro-Accounting Method; An Application of Environmental Accounting Principles for Evaluation and Valuation of Environmental Impact in Product Design,” Swedish Environmental Research Institute (IVL) Report.
4.
Kato
,
S.
,
Nikai
,
Y.
,
Maruyama
,
N.
,
Takai
,
H.
,
Widiyanto
,
A.
, and
Kojima
,
Y.
, 1999, “A Proposal of ESS-NETS and Its Application for Industrial Products (in Japanese),” Proc. of ’99 Symposium on Environmental Engineering, pp. 360–364.
5.
Kato
,
S.
,
Maruyama
,
N.
,
Nikai
,
Y.
,
Takai
,
H.
,
Kojima
,
Y.
, and
Widiyanto
,
A.
, 1999, “LCA Estimation Scheme Aiming at Compromising Compatibility between Environmental Load and Economical Cost for Co-generation Eco-operation,” Proc. of ECOS’99, pp. 276–281.
6.
Anonymous, 2000, “EDMC 2000, Energy and Economic Statistic in Japan,” The Energy Data and Modeling Center.
7.
Anonymous, 1999, “Energy Statistics Yearbook 1999,” United Nations Press.
8.
Kaneko
,
S.
, et al.
, 1997, “Operation Results of the Air Blown Entrained Flow Gasifier,” Proc. of International Conference of Engineering 97, 1, pp. 119–124
9.
Sato
,
S.
,
Ota
,
K.
,
Furuya
,
T.
,
Koyama
,
Y.
, and
Hashimoto
,
A.
,
2000
, “
Current Status of Research and Development in IGCC Demonstration Plant (in Japanese)
,”
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review
,
37
, No.
1
, pp.
25
28
.
10.
Kaneko, S., Ohta, K., Furuya, T. Shinada, O., and Hashimoto, A., 1999, “Design of IGCC Demonstration Plant (in Japanese),” Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Reviews, 36, No. 1, pp. 21–24.
11.
Horiuchi, K., 2000, “Test Operation of Osaki PFBC System (in Japanese),” Proc. The 7th Symposium on Power and Energy Technology 2000, JSME, pp. 85–90.
You do not currently have access to this content.