The wettability of PCB pads and component terminations, and the variation of wetta-bility with time, are important factors in the successful formation of a solder joint. However, reliable techniques for determining these properties, under conditions representative of the soldering process, do not as yet exist. The development of wetting balance tests has provided a technique for the qualitative comparison of surface wettability, but the test has poor repeatability and it is difficult to relate the test results to the actual surface properties. The small size of the terminations in surface mount technology (S.M.T.) prevents successful use of the conventional solder bath based wetting balance test. The globule wetting balance goes some way towards removing this limitation and is now often used as a means of comparing the solderability of S.M.T. devices, but is even worse in terms of repeatability and interpretation. This paper presents results from an evaluation of conventional and globule wetting balance tests using both computational modelling and experimental techniques. The results from the experimental tests show that reasonable consistency in the measured force can be obtained, but that the insensitivity of this force to the wetting angle of the component, particularly in the globule block test, precludes their ability to accurately establish the wetting angle. It is therefore concluded that this test is unsuitable for providing direct quantitative measurements of the wetting angle of the surface of interest. The computational models, through allowing an analysis of the sensitivity of the test to the uncontrolled test variables also provide an explanation for the significant scatter obtained in wetting balance test results. It is also seen, from comparison with test results, that models which incorporate commonly quoted text book values for the solder surface tension do not adequately predict the forces empirically observed. A technique is therefore also described whereby the solder surface tension under the actual test conditions may be deduced using the results from a scanning mode wetting balance test, thereby greatly improving the capability of the models to predict the surface tension forces, although significant errors in the predicted meniscus shape remain.

1.
Allen, B. M., 1983, “Scanning—a new slow-dipping solderability test,” Proceedings of Internepcon UK, Brighton, pp. 196–200.
2.
Bashforth, F., and Adams, J. C., 1883, The Theories of Capillary Action, Cambridge University Press.
3.
Boettinger, W. J., Handwerker, C. A., Kattner, U. R., 1993, “Reactive Wetting and Intermetallic Formation,” The Mechanics of Solder Alloy Wetting and Spreading, F. G. Yost et al., ed., Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, p. 109, ISBN 0442-01752-9.
4.
Brakke
K.
,
1992
, “
The Surface Evolver
,”
Experimental Mathematics
, Vol.
1
, No.
2
, pp.
141
165
.
5.
Conway
P. P.
,
Williams
D. J.
, and
Whalley
D. C.
,
1991
, “
Experiments to allow the interpretation of a computer based thermal model of the solder paste reflow process
Journal of Advanced Materials Processing
, Vol.
1
,
3/4
, pp.
175
180
.
6.
Domke, J., and Reimerdes, E., 1912, Handbuch der Ara¨ometrie, Julius Springer, Berlin, p. 24.
7.
Gunter
I. A.
,
1986
, “
The Solderability Testing of Surface Mount Devices Using the GEC Meniscograph Solderability Tester
,”
Circuit World
, Vol.
13
, No.
1
, pp.
8
12
.
8.
IEC384-10:1989, “Fixed Capacitors for use in Electronic Equipment; Sectional for Fixed Multilayer Ceramic Chip Capacitors.”
9.
Ju, T., Lin, W., Lee, Y. C., and Liu, J. J., 1993, “Effects of Ceramic Ball-Grid-Array Packages’ Manufacturing Variations on Solder Joint Reliability,” ASME Winter Annual Meeting, ASME 93-WA/EEP-2.
10.
Klein Wassink, R. J., 1989, Soldering in Electronics, 2nd Ed., Electrochemical Publications Ltd., Ayr, ISBN 0 901150 24 X.
11.
Lea, C., 1988, A Scientific Guide to Surface Mount Technology, Electrochemical Publications Ltd., Ayr, ISBN 0 901150 22 3, p. 315.
12.
Lea, C., 1990, “Quantitative Solderability Measurement of Electronic Components, Part 1: The Wetting Balance,” Soldering & Surface Mount Technology, No. 4, pp. 8–13.
13.
Moon
K. W.
,
Boettinger
W. J.
,
Williams
M. E.
,
Josell
D.
,
Murray
B.
,
Carter
W. C.
,
1996
Dynamic Aspects of Wetting Balance Tests
,”
ASME JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING
, Vol.
118
, No.
3
, Sept., pp.
174
183
.
14.
Racz
L. M.
,
Szekely
J.
,
Brakke
K. A.
,
1993
, “
A General Statement of the Problem and Description of a Proposed Method of Calculation for Some Meniscus Problems in Materials Processing
,”
ISIJ International
, Vol.
33
, pp.
3
328
.
15.
Whalley
D. C.
,
1965
, “
A Model to Explain SMT Open Circuit Joints Associated with Adjacent Solder Bridges
,”
Journal of Electronic Manufacturing
, Vol.
6
, pp.
39
44
.
16.
Williams
D. C.
,
1965
, “
The Effect of Capillary Elevation in Hydrometry
,”
Journal of Scientific Instruments
, Vol.
43
, pp.
88
92
.
17.
Yost, F. G., and Holm, E. A., 1995, “Capillary Flow on Narrow Strips and in V-Shaped Grooves,” Proceedings of the ASME INTERpack ’95, ASME EEP-Vol. 10-2, Advances in Electronic Packaging, pp. 1265–1271.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.