The performance of membrane humidifier (MH) and enthalpy wheel humidifier (EWH) for a large power proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) system is compared using simulations and experiments. The MH model is based on one dimensional diffusion equation and the EWH model is based on the porous media surface diffusion equation. Simulation results agree well with experimental data. According to the results, the effect of intake air temperature has a lower effect on the MH performance than it does on the EWH performance while the air mass flow has a much higher effect on the MH performance than it does on the EWH performance. MH performs better than EWH at a low flow rate but worse at a high flow rate. Vapor transfer mechanism in the humidifiers is also studied.

Issue Section:
Technical Briefs
Keywords:
fuel cell power plants, proton exchange membrane fuel cells, surface diffusion, membrane humidifier, enthalpy wheel humidifier, PEMFC
Topics:
Enthalpy, Humidifiers, Membranes, Wheels, Flow (Dynamics), Temperature, Diffusion (Physics), Proton exchange membrane fuel cells
1.
Carlson
,
E. J.
,
Kopf
,
P.
,
Sinha.
,
J.
, 2005, “
Cost Analysis of, PEM Fuel Cell Systems for Transportation
,” NREL Report.
2.
Chen
,
D.
, and
Peng
,
H.
, 2005, “
Thermodynamic Model of Membrane Humidifiers for PEM Fuel Cell Humidification Control
,”
ASME J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., Control
0022-0434,
127
(
3
), pp.
424
–
432
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
3.
Stefanopoulou
,
A. G.
,
Suh
, and
K.-W.
, 2007, “
Mechatronics in Fuel Cell Systems
,”
Control Eng. Pract.
0967-0661,
15
(
3
), pp.
277
–
289
.
Crossref
Search ADS
 
Copyright © 2009
 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
You do not currently have access to this content.