Current research in offshore wind turbines is proposing a novel concept of using seawater-based hydraulics for large-scale power transmission and centralized electrical generation. The objective of this paper is to investigate the control of such an open-loop circuit, where a fixed line pressure is desirable for the sake of efficiency and stability. Pressure control of the open-loop hydraulic circuit presents an interesting control challenge due to the highly fluctuating flow rate along with the nonlinear behavior of the variable-area orifice used by the pressure controller. The present analysis is limited to a single turbine and an open-loop hydraulic line with a variable-area orifice at the end. A controller is proposed which uses a combination of feed-forward compensation for the nonlinear part along with a feedback loop for correcting any errors resulting from inaccuracies in the compensator model. A numerical model of the system under investigation is developed in order to observe the behavior of the controller and the advantages of including the feedback loop. An in-depth analysis is undertaken, including a sensitivity study of the compensator accuracy and a parametric analysis of the actuator response time. Finally, a Monte Carlo analysis was carried out in order to rank the proposed controller in comparison to a simple feed-forward controller and a theoretical optimally tuned controller. Results indicate an advantageous performance of the proposed method of feedback with feed-forward compensation, particularly its ability to maintain a stable line pressure in the face of high parameter uncertainty over a wide range of operating conditions, even with a relatively slow actuation system.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
August 2016
Research-Article
A Comparison of Two Pressure Control Concepts for Hydraulic Offshore Wind Turbines
Daniel Buhagiar,
Daniel Buhagiar
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: daniel.buhagiar@um.edu.mt
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: daniel.buhagiar@um.edu.mt
Search for other works by this author on:
Tonio Sant,
Tonio Sant
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: tonio.sant@um.edu.mt
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: tonio.sant@um.edu.mt
Search for other works by this author on:
Marvin Bugeja
Marvin Bugeja
Department of Systems and Control Engineering,
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: marvin.bugeja@um.edu.mt
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: marvin.bugeja@um.edu.mt
Search for other works by this author on:
Daniel Buhagiar
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: daniel.buhagiar@um.edu.mt
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: daniel.buhagiar@um.edu.mt
Tonio Sant
Mem. ASME
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: tonio.sant@um.edu.mt
Department of Mechanical Engineering,
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: tonio.sant@um.edu.mt
Marvin Bugeja
Department of Systems and Control Engineering,
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: marvin.bugeja@um.edu.mt
University of Malta,
Msida, MSD 2080, Malta
e-mail: marvin.bugeja@um.edu.mt
1Corresponding author.
Contributed by the Dynamic Systems Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF DYNAMIC SYSTEMS, MEASUREMENT, AND CONTROL. Manuscript received October 2, 2015; final manuscript received March 7, 2016; published online May 25, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Ryozo Nagamune.
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. Aug 2016, 138(8): 081007 (11 pages)
Published Online: May 25, 2016
Article history
Received:
October 2, 2015
Revised:
March 7, 2016
Citation
Buhagiar, D., Sant, T., and Bugeja, M. (May 25, 2016). "A Comparison of Two Pressure Control Concepts for Hydraulic Offshore Wind Turbines." ASME. J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control. August 2016; 138(8): 081007. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4033104
Download citation file:
Get Email Alerts
Modeling and Control of a 3-DOF planar Cable-Driven Parallel Robot with Flexible Cables
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Adaptive Mesh Refinement and Error Estimation Method for Optimal Control Using Direct Collocation
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Motion Control Along Spatial Curves for Robot Manipulators: A Non-Inertial Frame Approach
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
A Case Study Comparing Both Stochastic and Worst-Case Robust Control Co-Design Under Different Control Structures
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control
Related Articles
Optimal Power Dispatch and Control of an Integrated Wind Turbine and Battery System
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,2017)
A New Model-Based Control Structure for Position Tracking in an Electro-Hydraulic Servo System With Acceleration Constraint
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (December,2017)
Optimal Design and Analysis of NIOFPID-Based Direct Power Control to Strengthen DFIG Power Control
J. Dyn. Sys., Meas., Control (September,2018)
Performance Improvement of Gas Liquid Cylindrical Cyclone Separators Using Integrated Level and Pressure Control Systems
J. Energy Resour. Technol (December,2000)
Related Proceedings Papers
Related Chapters
New H∞ Controllers Design for Networked Control System with Disturbance Based on Asynchronous Dynamical System
International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering (ICACTE 2009)
Station Automation
Pipeline System Automation and Control
Dynamic Behavior of Pumping Systems
Pipeline Pumping and Compression Systems: A Practical Approach